Here, we’re just setting a few options.

Now, we’re preparing our data for the codebook.

Create codebook

codebook(codebook_data,
                    detailed_variables = TRUE,
                    detailed_scales = TRUE,
         metadata_json = FALSE)
## Loading required namespace: GPArotation

Metadata

Description

Dataset name: codebook_data

The dataset has N=90 rows and 223 columns. 1 rows have no missing values on any column.

Metadata for search engines
  • Date published: 2023-03-30
x
ID
prolific_pid
loginID
loginPassword
idcodefinal
dummy_informedconsent
check_caminst
dummy_honestycontract
sociodemo_age
sociodemo_gender
sociodemo_education
sociodemo_impexp
sociodemo_impexpwho
sociodemo_country
sociodemo_faith
panas.01p
panas.02p
panas.03p
panas.04p
panas.05p
panas.06p
panas.07p
panas.08p
panas.09p
panas.10p
panas.01n
panas.02n
panas.03n
panas.04n
panas.05n
panas.06n
panas.07n
panas.08n
panas.09n
panas.10n
tam_bi.01
tam_bi.02
tam_bi.03
tam_bi.04
tam_bi.05
tam_canx.01n
tam_canx.02
tam_canx.03
tam_canx.04
tam_enj.01
tam_enj.02
tam_enj.03
tam_img.01
tam_img.02
tam_img.03
tam_pec.01
tam_pec.02
tam_pec.03
tam_pec.04
tam_pu.01
tam_pu.02
tam_pu.03
tam_pu.04
tam_rel.01
tam_rel.02
tam_rel.03
tam_res.01
tam_res.02
tam_res.03
tam_res.04
tam_sn.01
tam_sn.02
tam_sn.03
tam_sn.04
tam_vol.01
tam_vol.02
tam_vol.03
relativist01
relativist02
relativist03
relativist04
relativist05
contractualist01
contractualist02
contractualist03
contractualist04
contractualist05
contractualist06
contractualist07
hedonism01
hedonism02
hedonism03
hedonism04
hedonism05
hedonism06
hedonism07
hedonism08
hedonism09
hedonism10
utilitarian01
utilitarian02
utilitarian03
utilitarian04
utilitarian05
utilitarian06
utilitarian07
utilitarian08
utilitarian09
deontology01
deontology02
deontology03
deontology04
deontology05
deontology06
deontology07
deontology08
virtue01
virtue02
virtue03
virtue04
virtue05
virtue06
virtue07
virtue08
virtue09
conflictman.01
conflictman.02
conflictman.03
conflictman.04
conflictman.05
conflictman.06
conflictman.07
conflictman.08
conflictman.09
conflictman.10
conflictman.11
conflictman.12
conflictman.13
conflictman.14
conflictman.15
conflictman.16
conflictman.17
conflictman.18
conflictman.19
featurestechnologyfeelings.01
featurestechnologyfeelings.02
featurestechnologyfeelings.03
featurestechnologyfeelings.04
featurestechnologyfeelings.05
featurestechnologyfeelings.06
outcomerating_useful.01
outcomerating_good.01
outcomedummy_moral
outcomedummy_insurance
outcomedummy_funds
outcomedummy_prohibited
ques_mostimpnode
feedCAM_repres
feedCAM_technicalprobs
feedCAM_technicalprobsText
feedCAM_stopdrawing
feedCAM_stopdrawingText
feedCAM_already
feedCAM_alreadyText
feedback_critic
paradefocus
durationtotal
sociodemo_studentdummy
sociodemo_employment
duration_06scenariotext
duration_10caminstruct1
duration_07quesTechnologicalImplant
countclicks_07quesTechnologicalImplant
duration_ethicscale_01
countclicks_ethicscale_01
duration_ethicscale_02
countclicks_ethicscale_02
duration_ethicscale_03
countclicks_ethicscale_03
duration_ethicscale_04
countclicks_ethicscale_04
duration_ethicscale_05
countclicks_ethicscale_05
duration_XXquesTAM_rel02
countclicks_XXquesTAM_rel02
duration_XXquesTAM_vol10
countclicks_XXquesTAM_vol10
duration_XXquesTAM_img03
countclicks_XXquesTAM_img03
duration_XXquesTAM_enj09
countclicks_XXquesTAM_enj09
duration_XXquesTAM_canx08
countclicks_XXquesTAM_canx08
duration_XXquesTAM_pec07
countclicks_XXquesTAM_pec07
duration_XXquesTAM_bi04
countclicks_XXquesTAM_bi04
duration_XXquesTAM_pu05
countclicks_XXquesTAM_pu05
duration_XXquesTAM_res01
countclicks_XXquesTAM_res01
duration_XXquesTAM_sn06
countclicks_XXquesTAM_sn06
duration_quesPANAS01
duration_quesPANAS02
duration_XXquesConflictMan01
countclicks_XXquesConflictMan01
duration_XXquesConflictMan02
countclicks_XXquesConflictMan02
relativist
contractualist
hedonism
utilitarian
deontology
virtue
panas_negative
panas_positive
conflictman
TAM_bi
TAM_canx
TAM_enj
TAM_img
TAM_pec
TAM_pu
TAM_rel
TAM_res
TAM_sn
TAM_vol

#Variables

ID

Distribution

Distribution of values for ID

Distribution of values for ID

0 missing values.

Summary statistics

name data_type n_missing complete_rate n_unique empty min max whitespace label
ID character 0 1 80 0 1 2 0 NA

prolific_pid

Distribution

Distribution of values for prolific_pid

Distribution of values for prolific_pid

0 missing values.

Summary statistics

name data_type n_missing complete_rate n_unique empty min max whitespace label
prolific_pid character 0 1 90 0 24 24 0 NA

loginID

Distribution

Distribution of values for loginID

Distribution of values for loginID

0 missing values.

Summary statistics

name data_type n_missing complete_rate n_unique empty min max whitespace label
loginID character 0 1 90 0 6 6 0 NA

loginPassword

Distribution

Distribution of values for loginPassword

Distribution of values for loginPassword

0 missing values.

Summary statistics

name data_type n_missing complete_rate n_unique empty min max whitespace label
loginPassword character 0 1 87 0 3 3 0 NA

idcodefinal

Distribution

Distribution of values for idcodefinal

Distribution of values for idcodefinal

0 missing values.

Summary statistics

name data_type n_missing complete_rate n_unique empty min max whitespace label
idcodefinal character 0 1 90 0 10 22 0 NA

dummy_informedconsent

Distribution

Distribution of values for dummy_informedconsent

Distribution of values for dummy_informedconsent

0 missing values.

Summary statistics

name data_type n_missing complete_rate n_unique empty min max whitespace label
dummy_informedconsent character 0 1 1 0 1 1 0 NA

check_caminst

Distribution

Distribution of values for check_caminst

Distribution of values for check_caminst

78 missing values.

Summary statistics

name data_type n_missing complete_rate min median max mean sd hist label
check_caminst numeric 78 0.1333333 1 1 2 1.166667 0.3892495 <U+2587><U+2581><U+2581><U+2581><U+2582> NA

dummy_honestycontract

Distribution

Distribution of values for dummy_honestycontract

Distribution of values for dummy_honestycontract

0 missing values.

Summary statistics

name data_type n_missing complete_rate min median max mean sd hist label
dummy_honestycontract numeric 0 1 1 1 1 1 0 <U+2581><U+2581><U+2587><U+2581><U+2581> NA

sociodemo_age

Distribution

Distribution of values for sociodemo_age

Distribution of values for sociodemo_age

0 missing values.

Summary statistics

name data_type n_missing complete_rate min median max mean sd hist label
sociodemo_age numeric 0 1 19 32 72 33.31111 12.23978 <U+2587><U+2586><U+2582><U+2581><U+2581> NA

sociodemo_gender

Distribution

Distribution of values for sociodemo_gender

Distribution of values for sociodemo_gender

0 missing values.

Summary statistics

name data_type n_missing complete_rate n_unique empty min max whitespace label
sociodemo_gender character 0 1 3 0 4 8 0 NA

sociodemo_education

Distribution

Distribution of values for sociodemo_education

Distribution of values for sociodemo_education

0 missing values.

Summary statistics

name data_type n_missing complete_rate n_unique empty min max whitespace label
sociodemo_education character 0 1 6 1 0 10 0 NA

sociodemo_impexp

Distribution

Distribution of values for sociodemo_impexp

Distribution of values for sociodemo_impexp

0 missing values.

Summary statistics

name data_type n_missing complete_rate n_unique empty min max whitespace label
sociodemo_impexp character 0 1 2 0 2 3 0 NA

sociodemo_impexpwho

Distribution

Distribution of values for sociodemo_impexpwho

Distribution of values for sociodemo_impexpwho

86 missing values.

Summary statistics

name data_type n_missing complete_rate n_unique empty min max whitespace label
sociodemo_impexpwho character 86 0.0444444 3 0 5 6 0 NA

sociodemo_country

Distribution

Distribution of values for sociodemo_country

Distribution of values for sociodemo_country

0 missing values.

Summary statistics

name data_type n_missing complete_rate n_unique empty min max whitespace label
sociodemo_country character 0 1 11 0 5 24 0 NA

sociodemo_faith

Distribution

Distribution of values for sociodemo_faith

Distribution of values for sociodemo_faith

0 missing values.

Summary statistics

name data_type n_missing complete_rate n_unique empty min max whitespace label
sociodemo_faith character 0 1 4 0 1 1 0 NA

featurestechnologyfeelings.01

Distribution

Distribution of values for featurestechnologyfeelings.01

Distribution of values for featurestechnologyfeelings.01

0 missing values.

Summary statistics

name data_type n_missing complete_rate min median max mean sd hist label
featurestechnologyfeelings.01 numeric 0 1 2 7 7 6.311111 0.9318876 <U+2581><U+2581><U+2581><U+2585><U+2587> NA

featurestechnologyfeelings.02

Distribution

Distribution of values for featurestechnologyfeelings.02

Distribution of values for featurestechnologyfeelings.02

0 missing values.

Summary statistics

name data_type n_missing complete_rate min median max mean sd hist label
featurestechnologyfeelings.02 numeric 0 1 3 6 7 5.933333 0.9921037 <U+2581><U+2582><U+2583><U+2587><U+2587> NA

featurestechnologyfeelings.03

Distribution

Distribution of values for featurestechnologyfeelings.03

Distribution of values for featurestechnologyfeelings.03

0 missing values.

Summary statistics

name data_type n_missing complete_rate min median max mean sd hist label
featurestechnologyfeelings.03 numeric 0 1 2 7 7 6.277778 0.9364981 <U+2581><U+2581><U+2582><U+2585><U+2587> NA

featurestechnologyfeelings.04

Distribution

Distribution of values for featurestechnologyfeelings.04

Distribution of values for featurestechnologyfeelings.04

0 missing values.

Summary statistics

name data_type n_missing complete_rate min median max mean sd hist label
featurestechnologyfeelings.04 numeric 0 1 1 7 7 5.933333 1.444089 <U+2581><U+2581><U+2581><U+2581><U+2587> NA

featurestechnologyfeelings.05

Distribution

Distribution of values for featurestechnologyfeelings.05

Distribution of values for featurestechnologyfeelings.05

0 missing values.

Summary statistics

name data_type n_missing complete_rate min median max mean sd hist label
featurestechnologyfeelings.05 numeric 0 1 1 6 7 5.966667 1.136227 <U+2581><U+2581><U+2581><U+2582><U+2587> NA

featurestechnologyfeelings.06

Distribution

Distribution of values for featurestechnologyfeelings.06

Distribution of values for featurestechnologyfeelings.06

0 missing values.

Summary statistics

name data_type n_missing complete_rate min median max mean sd hist label
featurestechnologyfeelings.06 numeric 0 1 4 6 7 6.111111 1.010556 <U+2582><U+2582><U+2581><U+2586><U+2587> NA

outcomerating_useful.01

Distribution

Distribution of values for outcomerating_useful.01

Distribution of values for outcomerating_useful.01

0 missing values.

Summary statistics

name data_type n_missing complete_rate min median max mean sd hist label
outcomerating_useful.01 numeric 0 1 1 3 5 3.3 1.054152 <U+2581><U+2585><U+2587><U+2587><U+2583> NA

outcomerating_good.01

Distribution

Distribution of values for outcomerating_good.01

Distribution of values for outcomerating_good.01

0 missing values.

Summary statistics

name data_type n_missing complete_rate min median max mean sd hist label
outcomerating_good.01 numeric 0 1 1 3 5 3.177778 1.117559 <U+2582><U+2583><U+2587><U+2587><U+2582> NA

outcomedummy_moral

Distribution

Distribution of values for outcomedummy_moral

Distribution of values for outcomedummy_moral

0 missing values.

Summary statistics

name data_type n_missing complete_rate min median max mean sd hist label
outcomedummy_moral numeric 0 1 0 0 1 0.4666667 0.5016826 <U+2587><U+2581><U+2581><U+2581><U+2587> NA

outcomedummy_insurance

Distribution

Distribution of values for outcomedummy_insurance

Distribution of values for outcomedummy_insurance

0 missing values.

Summary statistics

name data_type n_missing complete_rate min median max mean sd hist label
outcomedummy_insurance numeric 0 1 0 1 1 0.5111111 0.502677 <U+2587><U+2581><U+2581><U+2581><U+2587> NA

outcomedummy_funds

Distribution

Distribution of values for outcomedummy_funds

Distribution of values for outcomedummy_funds

0 missing values.

Summary statistics

name data_type n_missing complete_rate min median max mean sd hist label
outcomedummy_funds numeric 0 1 0 0 1 0.4777778 0.5023043 <U+2587><U+2581><U+2581><U+2581><U+2587> NA

outcomedummy_prohibited

Distribution

Distribution of values for outcomedummy_prohibited

Distribution of values for outcomedummy_prohibited

0 missing values.

Summary statistics

name data_type n_missing complete_rate min median max mean sd hist label
outcomedummy_prohibited numeric 0 1 0 0 1 0.2 0.4022409 <U+2587><U+2581><U+2581><U+2581><U+2582> NA

ques_mostimpnode

Distribution

Distribution of values for ques_mostimpnode

Distribution of values for ques_mostimpnode

0 missing values.

Summary statistics

name data_type n_missing complete_rate n_unique empty min max whitespace label
ques_mostimpnode character 0 1 81 0 4 41 0 NA

feedCAM_repres

Distribution

Distribution of values for feedCAM_repres

Distribution of values for feedCAM_repres

0 missing values.

Summary statistics

name data_type n_missing complete_rate min median max mean sd hist label
feedCAM_repres numeric 0 1 2 6 7 6.033333 0.8798621 <U+2581><U+2581><U+2583><U+2587><U+2585> NA

feedCAM_technicalprobs

Distribution

Distribution of values for feedCAM_technicalprobs

Distribution of values for feedCAM_technicalprobs

0 missing values.

Summary statistics

name data_type n_missing complete_rate min median max mean sd hist label
feedCAM_technicalprobs numeric 0 1 0 0 1 0.2111111 0.4103833 <U+2587><U+2581><U+2581><U+2581><U+2582> NA

feedCAM_technicalprobsText

Distribution

Distribution of values for feedCAM_technicalprobsText

Distribution of values for feedCAM_technicalprobsText

0 missing values.

Summary statistics

name data_type n_missing complete_rate n_unique empty min max whitespace label
feedCAM_technicalprobsText character 0 1 20 71 0 201 0 NA

feedCAM_stopdrawing

Distribution

Distribution of values for feedCAM_stopdrawing

Distribution of values for feedCAM_stopdrawing

0 missing values.

Summary statistics

name data_type n_missing complete_rate min median max mean sd hist label
feedCAM_stopdrawing numeric 0 1 0 0 1 0.0555556 0.2303447 <U+2587><U+2581><U+2581><U+2581><U+2581> NA

feedCAM_stopdrawingText

Distribution

Distribution of values for feedCAM_stopdrawingText

Distribution of values for feedCAM_stopdrawingText

0 missing values.

Summary statistics

name data_type n_missing complete_rate n_unique empty min max whitespace label
feedCAM_stopdrawingText character 0 1 6 85 0 92 0 NA

feedCAM_already

Distribution

Distribution of values for feedCAM_already

Distribution of values for feedCAM_already

0 missing values.

Summary statistics

name data_type n_missing complete_rate min median max mean sd hist label
feedCAM_already numeric 0 1 0 0 2 0.1666667 0.5246722 <U+2587><U+2581><U+2581><U+2581><U+2581> NA

feedCAM_alreadyText

Distribution

Distribution of values for feedCAM_alreadyText

Distribution of values for feedCAM_alreadyText

0 missing values.

Summary statistics

name data_type n_missing complete_rate n_unique empty min max whitespace label
feedCAM_alreadyText character 0 1 7 84 0 67 0 NA

feedback_critic

Distribution

Distribution of values for feedback_critic

Distribution of values for feedback_critic

2 missing values.

Summary statistics

name data_type n_missing complete_rate n_unique empty min max whitespace label
feedback_critic character 2 0.9777778 60 28 0 581 0 NA

paradefocus

Distribution

Distribution of values for paradefocus

Distribution of values for paradefocus

44 missing values.

Summary statistics

name data_type n_missing complete_rate min median max mean sd hist label
paradefocus numeric 44 0.5111111 1 2 89 8.956522 17.11784 <U+2587><U+2581><U+2581><U+2581><U+2581> NA

durationtotal

Distribution

Distribution of values for durationtotal

Distribution of values for durationtotal

8 missing values.

Summary statistics

name data_type n_missing complete_rate min median max mean sd hist label
durationtotal numeric 8 0.9111111 23 57 198 61.62476 27.40293 <U+2587><U+2586><U+2582><U+2581><U+2581> NA

sociodemo_studentdummy

Distribution

Distribution of values for sociodemo_studentdummy

Distribution of values for sociodemo_studentdummy

0 missing values.

Summary statistics

name data_type n_missing complete_rate n_unique empty min max whitespace label
sociodemo_studentdummy character 0 1 3 1 0 3 0 NA

sociodemo_employment

Distribution

Distribution of values for sociodemo_employment

Distribution of values for sociodemo_employment

0 missing values.

Summary statistics

name data_type n_missing complete_rate n_unique empty min max whitespace label
sociodemo_employment character 0 1 6 0 5 56 0 NA

duration_06scenariotext

Distribution

Distribution of values for duration_06scenariotext

Distribution of values for duration_06scenariotext

0 missing values.

Summary statistics

name data_type n_missing complete_rate min median max mean sd hist label
duration_06scenariotext numeric 0 1 62 123 498 150.1851 87.55816 <U+2587><U+2582><U+2581><U+2581><U+2581> NA

duration_10caminstruct1

Distribution

Distribution of values for duration_10caminstruct1

Distribution of values for duration_10caminstruct1

0 missing values.

Summary statistics

name data_type n_missing complete_rate min median max mean sd hist label
duration_10caminstruct1 numeric 0 1 47 302 2444 354.8176 287.801 <U+2587><U+2581><U+2581><U+2581><U+2581> NA

duration_07quesTechnologicalImplant

Distribution

Distribution of values for duration_07quesTechnologicalImplant

Distribution of values for duration_07quesTechnologicalImplant

0 missing values.

Summary statistics

name data_type n_missing complete_rate min median max mean sd hist label
duration_07quesTechnologicalImplant numeric 0 1 14 32 153 39.93311 27.92708 <U+2587><U+2582><U+2581><U+2581><U+2581> NA

countclicks_07quesTechnologicalImplant

Distribution

Distribution of values for countclicks_07quesTechnologicalImplant

Distribution of values for countclicks_07quesTechnologicalImplant

0 missing values.

Summary statistics

name data_type n_missing complete_rate min median max mean sd hist label
countclicks_07quesTechnologicalImplant numeric 0 1 0 0 9 0.7444444 1.353822 <U+2587><U+2582><U+2581><U+2581><U+2581> NA

duration_ethicscale_01

Distribution

Distribution of values for duration_ethicscale_01

Distribution of values for duration_ethicscale_01

0 missing values.

Summary statistics

name data_type n_missing complete_rate min median max mean sd hist label
duration_ethicscale_01 numeric 0 1 8.8 50 234 62.35967 38.36097 <U+2587><U+2586><U+2581><U+2581><U+2581> NA

countclicks_ethicscale_01

Distribution

Distribution of values for countclicks_ethicscale_01

Distribution of values for countclicks_ethicscale_01

0 missing values.

Summary statistics

name data_type n_missing complete_rate min median max mean sd hist label
countclicks_ethicscale_01 numeric 0 1 0 0.5 7 1.155556 1.578729 <U+2587><U+2582><U+2582><U+2581><U+2581> NA

duration_ethicscale_02

Distribution

Distribution of values for duration_ethicscale_02

Distribution of values for duration_ethicscale_02

0 missing values.

Summary statistics

name data_type n_missing complete_rate min median max mean sd hist label
duration_ethicscale_02 numeric 0 1 9.3 45 648 63.20378 82.72533 <U+2587><U+2581><U+2581><U+2581><U+2581> NA

countclicks_ethicscale_02

Distribution

Distribution of values for countclicks_ethicscale_02

Distribution of values for countclicks_ethicscale_02

0 missing values.

Summary statistics

name data_type n_missing complete_rate min median max mean sd hist label
countclicks_ethicscale_02 numeric 0 1 0 1 10 1.411111 1.907374 <U+2587><U+2581><U+2581><U+2581><U+2581> NA

duration_ethicscale_03

Distribution

Distribution of values for duration_ethicscale_03

Distribution of values for duration_ethicscale_03

0 missing values.

Summary statistics

name data_type n_missing complete_rate min median max mean sd hist label
duration_ethicscale_03 numeric 0 1 8.6 42 164 50.91811 28.73207 <U+2587><U+2586><U+2582><U+2581><U+2581> NA

countclicks_ethicscale_03

Distribution

Distribution of values for countclicks_ethicscale_03

Distribution of values for countclicks_ethicscale_03

0 missing values.

Summary statistics

name data_type n_missing complete_rate min median max mean sd hist label
countclicks_ethicscale_03 numeric 0 1 0 1 7 1.455556 1.67037 <U+2587><U+2582><U+2582><U+2581><U+2581> NA

duration_ethicscale_04

Distribution

Distribution of values for duration_ethicscale_04

Distribution of values for duration_ethicscale_04

0 missing values.

Summary statistics

name data_type n_missing complete_rate min median max mean sd hist label
duration_ethicscale_04 numeric 0 1 7.9 42 155 48.98378 28.92376 <U+2587><U+2587><U+2582><U+2581><U+2581> NA

countclicks_ethicscale_04

Distribution

Distribution of values for countclicks_ethicscale_04

Distribution of values for countclicks_ethicscale_04

0 missing values.

Summary statistics

name data_type n_missing complete_rate min median max mean sd hist label
countclicks_ethicscale_04 numeric 0 1 0 1 9 1.4 1.674662 <U+2587><U+2582><U+2581><U+2581><U+2581> NA

duration_ethicscale_05

Distribution

Distribution of values for duration_ethicscale_05

Distribution of values for duration_ethicscale_05

0 missing values.

Summary statistics

name data_type n_missing complete_rate min median max mean sd hist label
duration_ethicscale_05 numeric 0 1 7.3 33 147 39.12539 23.27125 <U+2587><U+2585><U+2581><U+2581><U+2581> NA

countclicks_ethicscale_05

Distribution

Distribution of values for countclicks_ethicscale_05

Distribution of values for countclicks_ethicscale_05

0 missing values.

Summary statistics

name data_type n_missing complete_rate min median max mean sd hist label
countclicks_ethicscale_05 numeric 0 1 0 1 8 1.144444 1.597478 <U+2587><U+2582><U+2581><U+2581><U+2581> NA

duration_XXquesTAM_rel02

Distribution

Distribution of values for duration_XXquesTAM_rel02

Distribution of values for duration_XXquesTAM_rel02

0 missing values.

Summary statistics

name data_type n_missing complete_rate min median max mean sd hist label
duration_XXquesTAM_rel02 numeric 0 1 2.5 16 149 24.23094 25.1229 <U+2587><U+2581><U+2581><U+2581><U+2581> NA

countclicks_XXquesTAM_rel02

Distribution

Distribution of values for countclicks_XXquesTAM_rel02

Distribution of values for countclicks_XXquesTAM_rel02

0 missing values.

Summary statistics

name data_type n_missing complete_rate min median max mean sd hist label
countclicks_XXquesTAM_rel02 numeric 0 1 0 0 5 0.4111111 0.8855195 <U+2587><U+2581><U+2581><U+2581><U+2581> NA

duration_XXquesTAM_vol10

Distribution

Distribution of values for duration_XXquesTAM_vol10

Distribution of values for duration_XXquesTAM_vol10

0 missing values.

Summary statistics

name data_type n_missing complete_rate min median max mean sd hist label
duration_XXquesTAM_vol10 numeric 0 1 2.7 21 154 27.29189 20.91655 <U+2587><U+2582><U+2581><U+2581><U+2581> NA

countclicks_XXquesTAM_vol10

Distribution

Distribution of values for countclicks_XXquesTAM_vol10

Distribution of values for countclicks_XXquesTAM_vol10

0 missing values.

Summary statistics

name data_type n_missing complete_rate min median max mean sd hist label
countclicks_XXquesTAM_vol10 numeric 0 1 0 0 4 0.3888889 0.8030062 <U+2587><U+2582><U+2581><U+2581><U+2581> NA

duration_XXquesTAM_img03

Distribution

Distribution of values for duration_XXquesTAM_img03

Distribution of values for duration_XXquesTAM_img03

0 missing values.

Summary statistics

name data_type n_missing complete_rate min median max mean sd hist label
duration_XXquesTAM_img03 numeric 0 1 3.2 17 140 23.37356 21.67672 <U+2587><U+2581><U+2581><U+2581><U+2581> NA

countclicks_XXquesTAM_img03

Distribution

Distribution of values for countclicks_XXquesTAM_img03

Distribution of values for countclicks_XXquesTAM_img03

0 missing values.

Summary statistics

name data_type n_missing complete_rate min median max mean sd hist label
countclicks_XXquesTAM_img03 numeric 0 1 0 0 7 0.5 1.220149 <U+2587><U+2581><U+2581><U+2581><U+2581> NA

duration_XXquesTAM_enj09

Distribution

Distribution of values for duration_XXquesTAM_enj09

Distribution of values for duration_XXquesTAM_enj09

0 missing values.

Summary statistics

name data_type n_missing complete_rate min median max mean sd hist label
duration_XXquesTAM_enj09 numeric 0 1 2.4 13 117 17.54856 17.16578 <U+2587><U+2581><U+2581><U+2581><U+2581> NA

countclicks_XXquesTAM_enj09

Distribution

Distribution of values for countclicks_XXquesTAM_enj09

Distribution of values for countclicks_XXquesTAM_enj09

0 missing values.

Summary statistics

name data_type n_missing complete_rate min median max mean sd hist label
countclicks_XXquesTAM_enj09 numeric 0 1 0 0 5 0.3666667 0.9050421 <U+2587><U+2581><U+2581><U+2581><U+2581> NA

duration_XXquesTAM_canx08

Distribution

Distribution of values for duration_XXquesTAM_canx08

Distribution of values for duration_XXquesTAM_canx08

0 missing values.

Summary statistics

name data_type n_missing complete_rate min median max mean sd hist label
duration_XXquesTAM_canx08 numeric 0 1 4 16 221 22.7185 26.01469 <U+2587><U+2581><U+2581><U+2581><U+2581> NA

countclicks_XXquesTAM_canx08

Distribution

Distribution of values for countclicks_XXquesTAM_canx08

Distribution of values for countclicks_XXquesTAM_canx08

0 missing values.

Summary statistics

name data_type n_missing complete_rate min median max mean sd hist label
countclicks_XXquesTAM_canx08 numeric 0 1 0 0 7 0.7111111 1.274155 <U+2587><U+2581><U+2581><U+2581><U+2581> NA

duration_XXquesTAM_pec07

Distribution

Distribution of values for duration_XXquesTAM_pec07

Distribution of values for duration_XXquesTAM_pec07

0 missing values.

Summary statistics

name data_type n_missing complete_rate min median max mean sd hist label
duration_XXquesTAM_pec07 numeric 0 1 2.6 24 366 31.96933 39.48167 <U+2587><U+2581><U+2581><U+2581><U+2581> NA

countclicks_XXquesTAM_pec07

Distribution

Distribution of values for countclicks_XXquesTAM_pec07

Distribution of values for countclicks_XXquesTAM_pec07

0 missing values.

Summary statistics

name data_type n_missing complete_rate min median max mean sd hist label
countclicks_XXquesTAM_pec07 numeric 0 1 0 0 7 0.6 1.149499 <U+2587><U+2581><U+2581><U+2581><U+2581> NA

duration_XXquesTAM_bi04

Distribution

Distribution of values for duration_XXquesTAM_bi04

Distribution of values for duration_XXquesTAM_bi04

0 missing values.

Summary statistics

name data_type n_missing complete_rate min median max mean sd hist label
duration_XXquesTAM_bi04 numeric 0 1 5.1 26 577 35.34539 59.81958 <U+2587><U+2581><U+2581><U+2581><U+2581> NA

countclicks_XXquesTAM_bi04

Distribution

Distribution of values for countclicks_XXquesTAM_bi04

Distribution of values for countclicks_XXquesTAM_bi04

0 missing values.

Summary statistics

name data_type n_missing complete_rate min median max mean sd hist label
countclicks_XXquesTAM_bi04 numeric 0 1 0 0.5 6 0.8777778 1.139956 <U+2587><U+2582><U+2581><U+2581><U+2581> NA

duration_XXquesTAM_pu05

Distribution

Distribution of values for duration_XXquesTAM_pu05

Distribution of values for duration_XXquesTAM_pu05

0 missing values.

Summary statistics

name data_type n_missing complete_rate min median max mean sd hist label
duration_XXquesTAM_pu05 numeric 0 1 3.6 18 67 19.95939 11.81635 <U+2587><U+2587><U+2581><U+2581><U+2581> NA

countclicks_XXquesTAM_pu05

Distribution

Distribution of values for countclicks_XXquesTAM_pu05

Distribution of values for countclicks_XXquesTAM_pu05

0 missing values.

Summary statistics

name data_type n_missing complete_rate min median max mean sd hist label
countclicks_XXquesTAM_pu05 numeric 0 1 0 0 4 0.4666667 0.8637519 <U+2587><U+2582><U+2581><U+2581><U+2581> NA

duration_XXquesTAM_res01

Distribution

Distribution of values for duration_XXquesTAM_res01

Distribution of values for duration_XXquesTAM_res01

0 missing values.

Summary statistics

name data_type n_missing complete_rate min median max mean sd hist label
duration_XXquesTAM_res01 numeric 0 1 3.4 23 265 30.81072 30.32102 <U+2587><U+2581><U+2581><U+2581><U+2581> NA

countclicks_XXquesTAM_res01

Distribution

Distribution of values for countclicks_XXquesTAM_res01

Distribution of values for countclicks_XXquesTAM_res01

0 missing values.

Summary statistics

name data_type n_missing complete_rate min median max mean sd hist label
countclicks_XXquesTAM_res01 numeric 0 1 0 0 8 0.7 1.352899 <U+2587><U+2581><U+2581><U+2581><U+2581> NA

duration_XXquesTAM_sn06

Distribution

Distribution of values for duration_XXquesTAM_sn06

Distribution of values for duration_XXquesTAM_sn06

0 missing values.

Summary statistics

name data_type n_missing complete_rate min median max mean sd hist label
duration_XXquesTAM_sn06 numeric 0 1 4.5 23 158 31.724 22.60284 <U+2587><U+2583><U+2581><U+2581><U+2581> NA

countclicks_XXquesTAM_sn06

Distribution

Distribution of values for countclicks_XXquesTAM_sn06

Distribution of values for countclicks_XXquesTAM_sn06

0 missing values.

Summary statistics

name data_type n_missing complete_rate min median max mean sd hist label
countclicks_XXquesTAM_sn06 numeric 0 1 0 0 6 0.7222222 1.161438 <U+2587><U+2581><U+2581><U+2581><U+2581> NA

duration_quesPANAS01

Distribution

Distribution of values for duration_quesPANAS01

Distribution of values for duration_quesPANAS01

0 missing values.

Summary statistics

name data_type n_missing complete_rate min median max mean sd hist label
duration_quesPANAS01 numeric 0 1 13 31 195 39.0155 29.65596 <U+2587><U+2581><U+2581><U+2581><U+2581> NA

duration_quesPANAS02

Distribution

Distribution of values for duration_quesPANAS02

Distribution of values for duration_quesPANAS02

0 missing values.

Summary statistics

name data_type n_missing complete_rate min median max mean sd hist label
duration_quesPANAS02 numeric 0 1 9.4 24 99 27.77422 14.11098 <U+2587><U+2583><U+2581><U+2581><U+2581> NA

duration_XXquesConflictMan01

Distribution

Distribution of values for duration_XXquesConflictMan01

Distribution of values for duration_XXquesConflictMan01

0 missing values.

Summary statistics

name data_type n_missing complete_rate min median max mean sd hist label
duration_XXquesConflictMan01 numeric 0 1 12 68 1071 87.47111 111.4682 <U+2587><U+2581><U+2581><U+2581><U+2581> NA

countclicks_XXquesConflictMan01

Distribution

Distribution of values for countclicks_XXquesConflictMan01

Distribution of values for countclicks_XXquesConflictMan01

0 missing values.

Summary statistics

name data_type n_missing complete_rate min median max mean sd hist label
countclicks_XXquesConflictMan01 numeric 0 1 0 1 8 1.555556 1.932054 <U+2587><U+2583><U+2581><U+2581><U+2581> NA

duration_XXquesConflictMan02

Distribution

Distribution of values for duration_XXquesConflictMan02

Distribution of values for duration_XXquesConflictMan02

0 missing values.

Summary statistics

name data_type n_missing complete_rate min median max mean sd hist label
duration_XXquesConflictMan02 numeric 0 1 11 46 317 57.79606 42.87752 <U+2587><U+2582><U+2581><U+2581><U+2581> NA

countclicks_XXquesConflictMan02

Distribution

Distribution of values for countclicks_XXquesConflictMan02

Distribution of values for countclicks_XXquesConflictMan02

0 missing values.

Summary statistics

name data_type n_missing complete_rate min median max mean sd hist label
countclicks_XXquesConflictMan02 numeric 0 1 0 1 9 1.1 1.558233 <U+2587><U+2582><U+2581><U+2581><U+2581> NA

Scale: relativist

Overview

Reliability: .

Missing: 0.

Likert plot of scale relativist items

Likert plot of scale relativist items

Distribution of scale relativist

Distribution of scale relativist

Reliability details

## No viewer found, probably documenting or testing

Scale diagnosis
Reliability (internal consistency) estimates
Scale structure
Information about this scale
Dataframe: res$dat
Items: relativist01, relativist02, relativist03, relativist04 & relativist05
Observations: 90
Positive correlations: 10
Number of correlations: 10
Percentage positive correlations: 100
Estimates assuming interval level
Omega (total): 0.90
Omega (hierarchical): 0.78
Revelle’s Omega (total): 0.90
Greatest Lower Bound (GLB): 0.89
Coefficient H: 0.85
Coefficient Alpha: 0.84

(Estimates assuming ordinal level not computed, as the polychoric correlation matrix has missing values.)

Note: the normal point estimate and confidence interval for omega are based on the procedure suggested by Dunn, Baguley & Brunsden (2013) using the MBESS function ci.reliability, whereas the psych package point estimate was suggested in Revelle & Zinbarg (2008). See the help (‘?ufs::scaleStructure’) for more information.

Eigen values

3.086, 0.808, 0.454, 0.383 & 0.269

Factor analysis (reproducing only shared variance)
ML1
relativist01 0.750
relativist02 0.769
relativist03 0.683
relativist04 0.699
relativist05 0.711
Component analysis (reproducing full covariance matrix)
PC1
relativist01 0.812
relativist02 0.817
relativist03 0.755
relativist04 0.765
relativist05 0.778
Item descriptives
mean median var sd IQR se min q1 q3 max skew kurt dip n NA valid
relativist01 3.5778 4 2.6287 1.6213 3 0.1709 1 2 5 7 0.2295 -0.6884 0.1 90 0 90
relativist02 3.6667 4 2.9663 1.7223 3 0.1815 1 2 5 7 -0.0195 -0.8726 0.0833 90 0 90
relativist03 2.7444 3 1.9452 1.3947 2 0.147 1 2 4 7 0.6236 0.0133 0.1167 90 0 90
relativist04 4.5556 5 2.6542 1.6292 3 0.1717 1 3 6 7 -0.3644 -0.6218 0.1056 90 0 90
relativist05 3.8556 4 2.0351 1.4266 2 0.1504 1 2 5 7 -0.0722 -0.4403 0.0889 90 0 90
Scattermatrix
Scatterplot

Scatterplot


## No viewer found, probably documenting or testing

Summary statistics

name data_type n_missing complete_rate min median max mean sd hist label
relativist01 numeric 0 1 1 4 7 3.577778 1.621331 <U+2587><U+2585><U+2586><U+2583><U+2583> NA
relativist02 numeric 0 1 1 4 7 3.666667 1.722293 <U+2587><U+2585><U+2587><U+2585><U+2585> NA
relativist03 numeric 0 1 1 3 7 2.744444 1.394702 <U+2587><U+2585><U+2582><U+2582><U+2581> NA
relativist04 numeric 0 1 1 5 7 4.555556 1.629166 <U+2583><U+2583><U+2585><U+2585><U+2587> NA
relativist05 numeric 0 1 1 4 7 3.855556 1.426563 <U+2585><U+2585><U+2587><U+2585><U+2583> NA

Scale: contractualist

Overview

Reliability: .

Missing: 0.

Likert plot of scale contractualist items

Likert plot of scale contractualist items

Distribution of scale contractualist

Distribution of scale contractualist

Reliability details

## No viewer found, probably documenting or testing

Scale diagnosis
Reliability (internal consistency) estimates
Scale structure
Information about this scale
Dataframe: res$dat
Items: contractualist01, contractualist02, contractualist03, contractualist04, contractualist05, contractualist06 & contractualist07
Observations: 90
Positive correlations: 21
Number of correlations: 21
Percentage positive correlations: 100
Estimates assuming interval level
Omega (total): 0.93
Omega (hierarchical): 0.83
Revelle’s Omega (total): 0.93
Greatest Lower Bound (GLB): 0.93
Coefficient H: 0.91
Coefficient Alpha: 0.88

(Estimates assuming ordinal level not computed, as the polychoric correlation matrix has missing values.)

Note: the normal point estimate and confidence interval for omega are based on the procedure suggested by Dunn, Baguley & Brunsden (2013) using the MBESS function ci.reliability, whereas the psych package point estimate was suggested in Revelle & Zinbarg (2008). See the help (‘?ufs::scaleStructure’) for more information.

Eigen values

4.144, 0.958, 0.671, 0.466, 0.306, 0.243 & 0.212

Factor analysis (reproducing only shared variance)
ML1
contractualist01 0.860
contractualist02 0.833
contractualist03 0.698
contractualist04 0.615
contractualist05 0.609
contractualist06 0.855
contractualist07 0.561
Component analysis (reproducing full covariance matrix)
PC1
contractualist01 0.859
contractualist02 0.846
contractualist03 0.783
contractualist04 0.701
contractualist05 0.653
contractualist06 0.864
contractualist07 0.641
Item descriptives
mean median var sd IQR se min q1 q3 max skew kurt dip n NA valid
contractualist01 4.0333 4 1.7629 1.3278 2 0.14 1 3 5 7 -0.2096 -0.019 0.1056 90 0 90
contractualist02 3.9667 4 1.9652 1.4018 2 0.1478 1 2 6 7 -0.0397 -0.4752 0.0722 90 0 90
contractualist03 3.7333 4 2.8944 1.7013 2 0.1793 1 2.5 6 7 0.2189 -0.691 0.1167 90 0 90
contractualist04 4.0556 4 2.8171 1.6784 2 0.1769 1 3 6 7 0.1147 -0.7474 0.1056 90 0 90
contractualist05 3.8556 4 2.507 1.5833 2 0.1669 1 2 6 7 0.0694 -0.4056 0.0778 90 0 90
contractualist06 3.9556 4 2.6946 1.6415 2 0.173 1 3 6 7 0.0727 -0.796 0.1 90 0 90
contractualist07 3.6667 4 1.4382 1.1993 1 0.1264 1 2 5 7 -0.0044 0.7469 0.0833 90 0 90
Scattermatrix
Scatterplot

Scatterplot


## No viewer found, probably documenting or testing

Summary statistics

name data_type n_missing complete_rate min median max mean sd hist label
contractualist01 numeric 0 1 1 4 7 4.033333 1.327751 <U+2583><U+2583><U+2587><U+2585><U+2583> NA
contractualist02 numeric 0 1 1 4 7 3.966667 1.401845 <U+2583><U+2583><U+2587><U+2583><U+2583> NA
contractualist03 numeric 0 1 1 4 7 3.733333 1.701288 <U+2587><U+2587><U+2587><U+2582><U+2586> NA
contractualist04 numeric 0 1 1 4 7 4.055556 1.678423 <U+2586><U+2587><U+2587><U+2585><U+2587> NA
contractualist05 numeric 0 1 1 4 7 3.855556 1.583348 <U+2585><U+2583><U+2587><U+2582><U+2583> NA
contractualist06 numeric 0 1 1 4 7 3.955556 1.641533 <U+2587><U+2587><U+2587><U+2586><U+2587> NA
contractualist07 numeric 0 1 1 4 7 3.666667 1.199251 <U+2583><U+2582><U+2587><U+2582><U+2581> NA

Scale: hedonism

Overview

Reliability: .

Missing: 0.

Likert plot of scale hedonism items

Likert plot of scale hedonism items

Distribution of scale hedonism

Distribution of scale hedonism

Reliability details

## No viewer found, probably documenting or testing

Scale diagnosis
Reliability (internal consistency) estimates
Scale structure
Information about this scale
Dataframe: res$dat
Items: hedonism01, hedonism02, hedonism03, hedonism04, hedonism05, hedonism06, hedonism07, hedonism08, hedonism09 & hedonism10
Observations: 90
Positive correlations: 45
Number of correlations: 45
Percentage positive correlations: 100
Estimates assuming interval level
Omega (total): 0.91
Omega (hierarchical): 0.75
Revelle’s Omega (total): 0.91
Greatest Lower Bound (GLB): 0.93
Coefficient H: 0.94
Coefficient Alpha: 0.88

(Estimates assuming ordinal level not computed, as the polychoric correlation matrix has missing values.)

Note: the normal point estimate and confidence interval for omega are based on the procedure suggested by Dunn, Baguley & Brunsden (2013) using the MBESS function ci.reliability, whereas the psych package point estimate was suggested in Revelle & Zinbarg (2008). See the help (‘?ufs::scaleStructure’) for more information.

Eigen values

5.124, 1.184, 0.936, 0.725, 0.603, 0.467, 0.379, 0.258, 0.183 & 0.141

Factor analysis (reproducing only shared variance)
ML1 ML2
hedonism01 0.150 0.718
hedonism02 -0.191 0.633
hedonism03 0.323 0.124
hedonism04 0.672 0.002
hedonism05 0.591 0.401
hedonism06 0.277 0.324
hedonism07 0.673 0.255
hedonism08 0.987 -0.112
hedonism09 0.450 0.337
hedonism10 0.909 -0.015
Component analysis (reproducing full covariance matrix)
TC1 TC2
hedonism01 0.449 0.579
hedonism02 -0.081 0.889
hedonism03 0.542 -0.132
hedonism04 0.789 -0.168
hedonism05 0.786 0.239
hedonism06 0.432 0.302
hedonism07 0.801 0.158
hedonism08 0.934 -0.148
hedonism09 0.638 0.236
hedonism10 0.910 -0.072
Item descriptives
mean median var sd IQR se min q1 q3 max skew kurt dip n NA valid
hedonism01 4.4444 5 2.789 1.67 3 0.176 1 3 6 7 -0.5597 -0.4528 0.1111 90 0 90
hedonism02 4.6778 5 2.5355 1.5923 2 0.1678 1 4 6 7 -0.7852 0.1755 0.1278 90 0 90
hedonism03 2.1556 2 2.0429 1.4293 2 0.1507 1 1 4 7 1.4671 1.9348 0.1389 90 0 90
hedonism04 3.6778 4 2.6703 1.6341 2 0.1722 1 3 5 7 0.0467 -0.7762 0.1 90 0 90
hedonism05 3.7778 4 2.6242 1.6199 2 0.1708 1 2 5 7 -0.1495 -0.801 0.0944 90 0 90
hedonism06 4.7222 5 1.5961 1.2634 2 0.1332 1 4 6 7 -0.1749 0.1261 0.1389 90 0 90
hedonism07 4.7889 5 2.2134 1.4877 2 0.1568 1 4 6 7 -0.633 0.2402 0.1222 90 0 90
hedonism08 4.4333 5 2.7202 1.6493 3 0.1739 1 3 6 7 -0.3715 -0.6763 0.1056 90 0 90
hedonism09 3.6333 4 2.9315 1.7122 3 0.1805 1 2 5 7 0.1933 -0.7474 0.0889 90 0 90
hedonism10 4.0444 4 2.9418 1.7152 2 0.1808 1 2 6 7 -0.0021 -0.9607 0.0833 90 0 90
Scattermatrix
Scatterplot

Scatterplot


## No viewer found, probably documenting or testing

Summary statistics

name data_type n_missing complete_rate min median max mean sd hist label
hedonism01 numeric 0 1 1 5 7 4.444444 1.670034 <U+2583><U+2583><U+2585><U+2585><U+2587> NA
hedonism02 numeric 0 1 1 5 7 4.677778 1.592311 <U+2582><U+2582><U+2585><U+2586><U+2587> NA
hedonism03 numeric 0 1 1 2 7 2.155556 1.429317 <U+2587><U+2582><U+2581><U+2581><U+2581> NA
hedonism04 numeric 0 1 1 4 7 3.677778 1.634101 <U+2587><U+2587><U+2586><U+2586><U+2585> NA
hedonism05 numeric 0 1 1 4 7 3.777778 1.619944 <U+2587><U+2586><U+2587><U+2586><U+2586> NA
hedonism06 numeric 0 1 1 5 7 4.722222 1.263380 <U+2581><U+2582><U+2587><U+2587><U+2586> NA
hedonism07 numeric 0 1 1 5 7 4.788889 1.487736 <U+2582><U+2582><U+2586><U+2585><U+2587> NA
hedonism08 numeric 0 1 1 5 7 4.433333 1.649310 <U+2583><U+2583><U+2585><U+2586><U+2587> NA
hedonism09 numeric 0 1 1 4 7 3.633333 1.712151 <U+2587><U+2585><U+2586><U+2585><U+2583> NA
hedonism10 numeric 0 1 1 4 7 4.044444 1.715174 <U+2587><U+2586><U+2587><U+2585><U+2587> NA

Scale: utilitarian

Overview

Reliability: .

Missing: 0.

Likert plot of scale utilitarian items

Likert plot of scale utilitarian items

Distribution of scale utilitarian

Distribution of scale utilitarian

Reliability details

## No viewer found, probably documenting or testing

Scale diagnosis
Reliability (internal consistency) estimates
Scale structure
Information about this scale
Dataframe: res$dat
Items: utilitarian01, utilitarian02, utilitarian03, utilitarian04, utilitarian05, utilitarian06, utilitarian07, utilitarian08 & utilitarian09
Observations: 90
Positive correlations: 36
Number of correlations: 36
Percentage positive correlations: 100
Estimates assuming interval level
Omega (total): 0.95
Omega (hierarchical): 0.80
Revelle’s Omega (total): 0.95
Greatest Lower Bound (GLB): 0.95
Coefficient H: 0.94
Coefficient Alpha: 0.93

(Estimates assuming ordinal level not computed, as the polychoric correlation matrix has missing values.)

Note: the normal point estimate and confidence interval for omega are based on the procedure suggested by Dunn, Baguley & Brunsden (2013) using the MBESS function ci.reliability, whereas the psych package point estimate was suggested in Revelle & Zinbarg (2008). See the help (‘?ufs::scaleStructure’) for more information.

Eigen values

5.708, 0.835, 0.594, 0.435, 0.413, 0.331, 0.268, 0.234 & 0.182

Factor analysis (reproducing only shared variance)
ML1
utilitarian01 0.533
utilitarian02 0.848
utilitarian03 0.879
utilitarian04 0.665
utilitarian05 0.838
utilitarian06 0.840
utilitarian07 0.748
utilitarian08 0.723
utilitarian09 0.786
Component analysis (reproducing full covariance matrix)
PC1
utilitarian01 0.601
utilitarian02 0.866
utilitarian03 0.881
utilitarian04 0.708
utilitarian05 0.850
utilitarian06 0.845
utilitarian07 0.789
utilitarian08 0.773
utilitarian09 0.815
Item descriptives
mean median var sd IQR se min q1 q3 max skew kurt dip n NA valid
utilitarian01 5.0222 5 1.4152 1.1896 2 0.1254 1 4 6 7 -0.6989 0.8733 0.1444 90 0 90
utilitarian02 4.6333 5 1.8528 1.3612 2 0.1435 1 4 6 7 -0.5612 0.1093 0.1278 90 0 90
utilitarian03 4.2778 4 2.54 1.5937 2 0.168 1 2 5 7 -0.2649 -0.571 0.1056 90 0 90
utilitarian04 4.4222 5 2.1793 1.4762 2 0.1556 1 4 6 7 -0.616 -0.2112 0.1278 90 0 90
utilitarian05 4.1889 4 1.8853 1.3731 1 0.1447 1 2.5 5 7 -0.3493 0.232 0.0944 90 0 90
utilitarian06 4.3444 4 1.5991 1.2646 1 0.1333 1 2.5 5 7 -0.4759 0.6085 0.15 90 0 90
utilitarian07 4.2333 4 1.9112 1.3825 1 0.1457 1 2 5 7 -0.2488 -0.3643 0.1167 90 0 90
utilitarian08 5.1 5 2.1584 1.4692 2 0.1549 1 4 6 7 -0.8506 0.8573 0.1222 90 0 90
utilitarian09 4.2667 4 2.6022 1.6131 3 0.17 1 2 6 7 -0.3476 -0.615 0.1056 90 0 90
Scattermatrix
Scatterplot

Scatterplot


## No viewer found, probably documenting or testing

Summary statistics

name data_type n_missing complete_rate min median max mean sd hist label
utilitarian01 numeric 0 1 1 5 7 5.022222 1.189635 <U+2581><U+2581><U+2585><U+2587><U+2587> NA
utilitarian02 numeric 0 1 1 5 7 4.633333 1.361179 <U+2582><U+2582><U+2587><U+2587><U+2587> NA
utilitarian03 numeric 0 1 1 4 7 4.277778 1.593722 <U+2585><U+2585><U+2586><U+2587><U+2587> NA
utilitarian04 numeric 0 1 1 5 7 4.422222 1.476237 <U+2585><U+2582><U+2587><U+2587><U+2587> NA
utilitarian05 numeric 0 1 1 4 7 4.188889 1.373051 <U+2582><U+2582><U+2587><U+2583><U+2583> NA
utilitarian06 numeric 0 1 1 4 7 4.344444 1.264566 <U+2582><U+2582><U+2587><U+2586><U+2583> NA
utilitarian07 numeric 0 1 1 4 7 4.233333 1.382475 <U+2583><U+2582><U+2587><U+2586><U+2585> NA
utilitarian08 numeric 0 1 1 5 7 5.100000 1.469159 <U+2581><U+2581><U+2585><U+2585><U+2587> NA
utilitarian09 numeric 0 1 1 4 7 4.266667 1.613148 <U+2585><U+2583><U+2587><U+2586><U+2587> NA

Scale: deontology

Overview

Reliability: .

Missing: 0.

Likert plot of scale deontology items

Likert plot of scale deontology items

Distribution of scale deontology

Distribution of scale deontology

Reliability details

## No viewer found, probably documenting or testing

Scale diagnosis
Reliability (internal consistency) estimates
Scale structure
Information about this scale
Dataframe: res$dat
Items: deontology01, deontology02, deontology03, deontology04, deontology05, deontology06, deontology07 & deontology08
Observations: 90
Positive correlations: 28
Number of correlations: 28
Percentage positive correlations: 100
Estimates assuming interval level
Omega (total): 0.92
Omega (hierarchical): 0.62
Revelle’s Omega (total): 0.92
Greatest Lower Bound (GLB): 0.93
Coefficient H: 0.90
Coefficient Alpha: 0.86

(Estimates assuming ordinal level not computed, as the polychoric correlation matrix has missing values.)

Note: the normal point estimate and confidence interval for omega are based on the procedure suggested by Dunn, Baguley & Brunsden (2013) using the MBESS function ci.reliability, whereas the psych package point estimate was suggested in Revelle & Zinbarg (2008). See the help (‘?ufs::scaleStructure’) for more information.

Eigen values

4.222, 1.219, 0.608, 0.507, 0.47, 0.406, 0.354 & 0.213

Factor analysis (reproducing only shared variance)
ML1 ML2
deontology01 -0.044 0.867
deontology02 0.345 0.545
deontology03 0.838 0.031
deontology04 0.742 -0.192
deontology05 0.693 -0.027
deontology06 0.587 0.241
deontology07 0.812 0.004
deontology08 0.709 0.072
Component analysis (reproducing full covariance matrix)
TC1 TC2
deontology01 -0.088 0.937
deontology02 0.299 0.706
deontology03 0.824 0.090
deontology04 0.837 -0.248
deontology05 0.779 -0.033
deontology06 0.587 0.359
deontology07 0.822 0.038
deontology08 0.745 0.114
Item descriptives
mean median var sd IQR se min q1 q3 max skew kurt dip n NA valid
deontology01 3.9222 4 1.7804 1.3343 1 0.1406 1 2 5.5 7 -0.087 0.3682 0.0667 90 0 90
deontology02 3.8111 4 1.3235 1.1504 1 0.1213 1 3 5 7 -0.2539 1.4955 0.0833 90 0 90
deontology03 3.4889 4 2.2527 1.5009 2 0.1582 1 2 5 7 0.1952 -0.3823 0.0944 90 0 90
deontology04 3.7889 4 2.9999 1.732 3 0.1826 1 2 6 7 0.2144 -0.917 0.1 90 0 90
deontology05 4.0111 4 1.5392 1.2406 2 0.1308 1 3 6 7 -0.0576 0.4543 0.0722 90 0 90
deontology06 4.0444 4 1.5486 1.2444 2 0.1312 1 3 5 7 0.0573 0.2176 0.1056 90 0 90
deontology07 2.9333 3 2.3101 1.5199 2 0.1602 1 1 4 7 0.4292 -0.5734 0.1111 90 0 90
deontology08 3.8 4 1.6449 1.2826 1 0.1352 1 2 5 7 -0.0732 0.2365 0.0667 90 0 90
Scattermatrix
Scatterplot

Scatterplot


## No viewer found, probably documenting or testing

Summary statistics

name data_type n_missing complete_rate min median max mean sd hist label
deontology01 numeric 0 1 1 4 7 3.922222 1.334316 <U+2582><U+2582><U+2587><U+2582><U+2582> NA
deontology02 numeric 0 1 1 4 7 3.811111 1.150422 <U+2582><U+2582><U+2587><U+2582><U+2581> NA
deontology03 numeric 0 1 1 4 7 3.488889 1.500894 <U+2587><U+2585><U+2587><U+2583><U+2582> NA
deontology04 numeric 0 1 1 4 7 3.788889 1.732015 <U+2587><U+2585><U+2586><U+2585><U+2585> NA
deontology05 numeric 0 1 1 4 7 4.011111 1.240645 <U+2582><U+2582><U+2587><U+2582><U+2582> NA
deontology06 numeric 0 1 1 4 7 4.044444 1.244413 <U+2582><U+2585><U+2587><U+2585><U+2582> NA
deontology07 numeric 0 1 1 3 7 2.933333 1.519905 <U+2587><U+2585><U+2583><U+2582><U+2581> NA
deontology08 numeric 0 1 1 4 7 3.800000 1.282554 <U+2583><U+2582><U+2587><U+2582><U+2582> NA

Scale: virtue

Overview

Reliability: .

Missing: 0.

Likert plot of scale virtue items

Likert plot of scale virtue items

Distribution of scale virtue

Distribution of scale virtue

Reliability details

## No viewer found, probably documenting or testing

Scale diagnosis
Reliability (internal consistency) estimates
Scale structure
Information about this scale
Dataframe: res$dat
Items: virtue01, virtue02, virtue03, virtue04, virtue05, virtue06, virtue07, virtue08 & virtue09
Observations: 90
Positive correlations: 36
Number of correlations: 36
Percentage positive correlations: 100
Estimates assuming interval level
Omega (total): 0.94
Omega (hierarchical): 0.78
Revelle’s Omega (total): 0.94
Greatest Lower Bound (GLB): 0.94
Coefficient H: 0.93
Coefficient Alpha: 0.91

(Estimates assuming ordinal level not computed, as the polychoric correlation matrix has missing values.)

Note: the normal point estimate and confidence interval for omega are based on the procedure suggested by Dunn, Baguley & Brunsden (2013) using the MBESS function ci.reliability, whereas the psych package point estimate was suggested in Revelle & Zinbarg (2008). See the help (‘?ufs::scaleStructure’) for more information.

Eigen values

5.247, 1.057, 0.758, 0.551, 0.453, 0.286, 0.253, 0.23 & 0.164

Factor analysis (reproducing only shared variance)
ML1 ML2
virtue01 0.844 -0.001
virtue02 0.811 0.080
virtue03 -0.023 0.862
virtue04 0.154 0.505
virtue05 0.074 0.878
virtue06 -0.157 0.664
virtue07 0.745 -0.030
virtue08 0.793 -0.037
virtue09 0.436 0.444
Component analysis (reproducing full covariance matrix)
TC1 TC2
virtue01 0.821 0.048
virtue02 0.846 0.059
virtue03 0.384 0.631
virtue04 0.601 0.120
virtue05 0.537 0.538
virtue06 -0.126 0.924
virtue07 0.826 -0.107
virtue08 0.907 -0.171
virtue09 0.626 0.359
Item descriptives
mean median var sd IQR se min q1 q3 max skew kurt dip n NA valid
virtue01 4 4 2.2921 1.514 2 0.1596 1 2 5 7 -0.1788 -0.4683 0.1278 90 0 90
virtue02 4.0222 4 2.4489 1.5649 2 0.165 1 2 6 7 -0.0376 -0.6939 0.0889 90 0 90
virtue03 4.4444 4 1.5755 1.2552 1 0.1323 1 2 6 7 -0.0631 0.6518 0.0944 90 0 90
virtue04 4.2444 4 1.4227 1.1928 1 0.1257 2 3 5 7 0.2426 0.0508 0.1056 90 0 90
virtue05 4.4333 4 1.8663 1.3661 1 0.144 1 2 6 7 -0.4789 0.3638 0.1111 90 0 90
virtue06 5.3222 6 1.8164 1.3477 2 0.1421 1 4 7 7 -0.8087 0.5371 0.1167 90 0 90
virtue07 2.8333 2 3.0618 1.7498 3 0.1844 1 1 4 7 0.7886 -0.3567 0.1111 90 0 90
virtue08 3.7667 4 1.8663 1.3661 2 0.144 1 2 5 7 -0.1874 -0.4754 0.1056 90 0 90
virtue09 4.6222 5 2.1253 1.4579 2 0.1537 1 4 6 7 -0.5147 -0.0478 0.1278 90 0 90
Scattermatrix
Scatterplot

Scatterplot


## No viewer found, probably documenting or testing

Summary statistics

name data_type n_missing complete_rate min median max mean sd hist label
virtue01 numeric 0 1 1 4 7 4.000000 1.513980 <U+2586><U+2585><U+2587><U+2587><U+2585> NA
virtue02 numeric 0 1 1 4 7 4.022222 1.564909 <U+2586><U+2582><U+2587><U+2585><U+2585> NA
virtue03 numeric 0 1 1 4 7 4.444444 1.255201 <U+2581><U+2581><U+2587><U+2583><U+2583> NA
virtue04 numeric 0 1 2 4 7 4.244444 1.192779 <U+2585><U+2587><U+2583><U+2582><U+2581> NA
virtue05 numeric 0 1 1 4 7 4.433333 1.366123 <U+2582><U+2582><U+2587><U+2585><U+2585> NA
virtue06 numeric 0 1 1 6 7 5.322222 1.347722 <U+2581><U+2581><U+2583><U+2583><U+2587> NA
virtue07 numeric 0 1 1 2 7 2.833333 1.749799 <U+2587><U+2583><U+2582><U+2581><U+2582> NA
virtue08 numeric 0 1 1 4 7 3.766667 1.366123 <U+2585><U+2583><U+2587><U+2585><U+2582> NA
virtue09 numeric 0 1 1 5 7 4.622222 1.457856 <U+2582><U+2582><U+2587><U+2587><U+2587> NA

Scale: panas_negative

Overview

Reliability: .

Missing: 0.

Likert plot of scale panas_negative items

Likert plot of scale panas_negative items

Distribution of scale panas_negative

Distribution of scale panas_negative

Reliability details

## No viewer found, probably documenting or testing

Scale diagnosis
Reliability (internal consistency) estimates
Scale structure
Information about this scale
Dataframe: res$dat
Items: panas.01n, panas.02n, panas.03n, panas.04n, panas.05n, panas.06n, panas.07n, panas.08n, panas.09n & panas.10n
Observations: 90
Positive correlations: 45
Number of correlations: 45
Percentage positive correlations: 100
Estimates assuming interval level
Omega (total): 0.95
Omega (hierarchical): 0.77
Revelle’s Omega (total): 0.95
Greatest Lower Bound (GLB): 0.95
Coefficient H: 0.95
Coefficient Alpha: 0.92

(Estimates assuming ordinal level not computed, as the polychoric correlation matrix has missing values.)

Note: the normal point estimate and confidence interval for omega are based on the procedure suggested by Dunn, Baguley & Brunsden (2013) using the MBESS function ci.reliability, whereas the psych package point estimate was suggested in Revelle & Zinbarg (2008). See the help (‘?ufs::scaleStructure’) for more information.

Eigen values

5.86, 0.972, 0.881, 0.692, 0.439, 0.351, 0.31, 0.236, 0.161 & 0.098

Factor analysis (reproducing only shared variance)
ML1
panas.01n 0.856
panas.02n 0.780
panas.03n 0.450
panas.04n 0.921
panas.05n 0.595
panas.06n 0.714
panas.07n 0.601
panas.08n 0.813
panas.09n 0.565
panas.10n 0.879
Component analysis (reproducing full covariance matrix)
PC1
panas.01n 0.861
panas.02n 0.844
panas.03n 0.520
panas.04n 0.879
panas.05n 0.696
panas.06n 0.813
panas.07n 0.684
panas.08n 0.786
panas.09n 0.640
panas.10n 0.851
Item descriptives
mean median var sd IQR se min q1 q3 max skew kurt dip n NA valid
panas.01n 2.2111 2 1.4718 1.2132 2 0.1279 1 1 3 5 0.7027 -0.4649 0.1222 90 0 90
panas.02n 1.9778 2 1.3928 1.1802 2 0.1244 1 1 3 5 1.0505 0.2731 0.1056 90 0 90
panas.03n 1.3778 1 0.5523 0.7432 0 0.0783 1 NA 3 4 1.776 1.8693 0.0611 90 0 90
panas.04n 2.7 2 1.4483 1.2035 2 0.1269 1 1 4 5 0.4842 -0.7729 0.0889 90 0 90
panas.05n 1.9 2 1.1921 1.0918 1 0.1151 1 1 4 5 1.1028 0.3011 0.1444 90 0 90
panas.06n 1.8111 2 0.9414 0.9703 1 0.1023 1 1 3 4 0.9949 -0.0566 0.15 90 0 90
panas.07n 1.3889 1 0.6448 0.803 1 0.0846 1 NA 2 5 2.5023 6.5362 0.0889 90 0 90
panas.08n 3.0667 3 1.4562 1.2067 2 0.1272 1 2 4 5 0.1835 -1.2046 0.1333 90 0 90
panas.09n 2.1556 2 1.1441 1.0696 2 0.1127 1 1 3 5 0.7526 0.0119 0.1611 90 0 90
panas.10n 2.7667 2 1.327 1.1519 2 0.1214 1 1 4 5 0.4271 -0.7749 0.1 90 0 90
Scattermatrix
Scatterplot

Scatterplot


## No viewer found, probably documenting or testing

Summary statistics

name data_type n_missing complete_rate min median max mean sd hist label
panas.01n numeric 0 1 1 2 5 2.211111 1.2131716 <U+2587><U+2585><U+2585><U+2582><U+2581> NA
panas.02n numeric 0 1 1 2 5 1.977778 1.1801521 <U+2587><U+2583><U+2583><U+2581><U+2581> NA
panas.03n numeric 0 1 1 1 4 1.377778 0.7431754 <U+2587><U+2581><U+2581><U+2581><U+2581> NA
panas.04n numeric 0 1 1 2 5 2.700000 1.2034594 <U+2582><U+2587><U+2583><U+2583><U+2582> NA
panas.05n numeric 0 1 1 2 5 1.900000 1.0918493 <U+2587><U+2585><U+2582><U+2582><U+2581> NA
panas.06n numeric 0 1 1 2 4 1.811111 0.9702825 <U+2587><U+2585><U+2581><U+2582><U+2582> NA
panas.07n numeric 0 1 1 1 5 1.388889 0.8030062 <U+2587><U+2582><U+2581><U+2581><U+2581> NA
panas.08n numeric 0 1 1 3 5 3.066667 1.2067227 <U+2581><U+2587><U+2583><U+2586><U+2583> NA
panas.09n numeric 0 1 1 2 5 2.155556 1.0696120 <U+2587><U+2587><U+2585><U+2582><U+2581> NA
panas.10n numeric 0 1 1 2 5 2.766667 1.1519402 <U+2582><U+2587><U+2583><U+2583><U+2582> NA

Scale: panas_positive

Overview

Reliability: .

Missing: 0.

Likert plot of scale panas_positive items

Likert plot of scale panas_positive items

Distribution of scale panas_positive

Distribution of scale panas_positive

Reliability details

## No viewer found, probably documenting or testing

Scale diagnosis
Reliability (internal consistency) estimates
Scale structure
Information about this scale
Dataframe: res$dat
Items: panas.01p, panas.02p, panas.03p, panas.04p, panas.05p, panas.06p, panas.07p, panas.08p, panas.09p & panas.10p
Observations: 90
Positive correlations: 45
Number of correlations: 45
Percentage positive correlations: 100
Estimates assuming interval level
Omega (total): 0.95
Omega (hierarchical): 0.78
Revelle’s Omega (total): 0.95
Greatest Lower Bound (GLB): 0.96
Coefficient H: 0.93
Coefficient Alpha: 0.92

(Estimates assuming ordinal level not computed, as the polychoric correlation matrix has missing values.)

Note: the normal point estimate and confidence interval for omega are based on the procedure suggested by Dunn, Baguley & Brunsden (2013) using the MBESS function ci.reliability, whereas the psych package point estimate was suggested in Revelle & Zinbarg (2008). See the help (‘?ufs::scaleStructure’) for more information.

Eigen values

5.887, 1.203, 0.694, 0.456, 0.422, 0.357, 0.3, 0.26, 0.241 & 0.18

Factor analysis (reproducing only shared variance)
ML1 ML2
panas.01p 0.639 0.183
panas.02p 0.849 -0.018
panas.03p 0.404 0.414
panas.04p 0.826 0.083
panas.05p 0.805 -0.053
panas.06p -0.130 0.819
panas.07p 0.923 -0.106
panas.08p 0.580 0.282
panas.09p 0.157 0.682
panas.10p 0.368 0.545
Component analysis (reproducing full covariance matrix)
TC1 TC2
panas.01p 0.686 0.182
panas.02p 0.868 -0.021
panas.03p 0.472 0.432
panas.04p 0.854 0.069
panas.05p 0.888 -0.119
panas.06p -0.128 0.942
panas.07p 0.929 -0.105
panas.08p 0.673 0.241
panas.09p 0.196 0.740
panas.10p 0.446 0.534
Item descriptives
mean median var sd IQR se min q1 q3 max skew kurt dip n NA valid
panas.01p 3.4667 4 1.6 1.2649 3 0.1333 1 2 5 5 -0.3322 -1.0339 0.1333 90 0 90
panas.02p 2.7333 3 1.6584 1.2878 2 0.1357 1 2 4 5 0.2248 -0.9924 0.1222 90 0 90
panas.03p 2.4222 2 1.7748 1.3322 2 0.1404 1 1 4 5 0.4916 -0.9541 0.1056 90 0 90
panas.04p 2.6 3 1.4787 1.216 2 0.1282 1 2 4 5 0.2025 -1.0146 0.1222 90 0 90
panas.05p 1.9333 1 1.6584 1.2878 2 0.1357 1 NA 3 5 0.9983 -0.5274 0.0833 90 0 90
panas.06p 3.1111 3 1.6055 1.2671 2 0.1336 1 2 4 5 -0.2133 -1.0606 0.1056 90 0 90
panas.07p 2.5889 2 1.8403 1.3566 3 0.143 1 1 4 5 0.4845 -0.9623 0.1278 90 0 90
panas.08p 2.4333 2 1.5966 1.2636 2 0.1332 1 1 4 5 0.3927 -1.0282 0.1222 90 0 90
panas.09p 3.2778 3 1.2591 1.1221 1 0.1183 1 2 4 5 -0.2791 -0.4901 0.1444 90 0 90
panas.10p 2.7667 3 1.5517 1.2457 2 0.1313 1 1 4 5 -0.0427 -0.9726 0.1167 90 0 90
Scattermatrix
Scatterplot

Scatterplot


## No viewer found, probably documenting or testing

Summary statistics

name data_type n_missing complete_rate min median max mean sd hist label
panas.01p numeric 0 1 1 4 5 3.466667 1.264911 <U+2582><U+2586><U+2586><U+2587><U+2587> NA
panas.02p numeric 0 1 1 3 5 2.733333 1.287799 <U+2586><U+2587><U+2587><U+2586><U+2583> NA
panas.03p numeric 0 1 1 2 5 2.422222 1.332209 <U+2587><U+2585><U+2585><U+2583><U+2582> NA
panas.04p numeric 0 1 1 3 5 2.600000 1.215998 <U+2587><U+2587><U+2587><U+2586><U+2582> NA
panas.05p numeric 0 1 1 1 5 1.933333 1.287799 <U+2587><U+2582><U+2581><U+2582><U+2581> NA
panas.06p numeric 0 1 1 3 5 3.111111 1.267081 <U+2583><U+2585><U+2585><U+2587><U+2583> NA
panas.07p numeric 0 1 1 2 5 2.588889 1.356586 <U+2587><U+2587><U+2585><U+2583><U+2583> NA
panas.08p numeric 0 1 1 2 5 2.433333 1.263578 <U+2587><U+2586><U+2585><U+2585><U+2582> NA
panas.09p numeric 0 1 1 3 5 3.277778 1.122075 <U+2582><U+2583><U+2587><U+2587><U+2583> NA
panas.10p numeric 0 1 1 3 5 2.766667 1.245667 <U+2586><U+2583><U+2587><U+2585><U+2582> NA

Scale: conflictman

Overview

Reliability: .

Missing: 0.

Likert plot of scale conflictman items

Likert plot of scale conflictman items

Distribution of scale conflictman

Distribution of scale conflictman

Reliability details

## No viewer found, probably documenting or testing

Scale diagnosis
Reliability (internal consistency) estimates
Scale structure
Information about this scale
Dataframe: res$dat
Items: conflictman.01, conflictman.02, conflictman.03, conflictman.04, conflictman.05, conflictman.06, conflictman.07, conflictman.08, conflictman.09, conflictman.10, conflictman.11, conflictman.12, conflictman.13, conflictman.14, conflictman.15, conflictman.16, conflictman.17, conflictman.18 & conflictman.19
Observations: 90
Positive correlations: 143
Number of correlations: 171
Percentage positive correlations: 84
Estimates assuming interval level
Omega (total): 0.78
Omega (hierarchical): 0.28
Revelle’s Omega (total): 0.78
Greatest Lower Bound (GLB): 0.88
Coefficient H: 0.78
Coefficient Alpha: 0.73

(Estimates assuming ordinal level not computed, as the polychoric correlation matrix has missing values.)

Note: the normal point estimate and confidence interval for omega are based on the procedure suggested by Dunn, Baguley & Brunsden (2013) using the MBESS function ci.reliability, whereas the psych package point estimate was suggested in Revelle & Zinbarg (2008). See the help (‘?ufs::scaleStructure’) for more information.

Eigen values

3.481, 1.942, 1.898, 1.402, 1.256, 1.135, 1.026, 1.006, 0.863, 0.761, 0.722, 0.676, 0.587, 0.471, 0.461, 0.398, 0.349, 0.295 & 0.27

Factor analysis (reproducing only shared variance)
ML7 ML1 ML4 ML6 ML3 ML2 ML5 ML8
conflictman.01 0.377 0.068 0.490 -0.079 0.196 -0.061 0.086 0.017
conflictman.02 -0.007 -0.050 0.205 0.306 -0.017 0.001 0.395 0.079
conflictman.03 -0.008 0.980 0.005 -0.001 -0.010 0.032 0.018 0.056
conflictman.04 0.528 0.102 -0.107 0.047 0.135 -0.099 0.134 -0.190
conflictman.05 0.288 0.277 0.027 0.199 0.036 -0.122 -0.379 -0.116
conflictman.06 0.555 0.053 -0.040 -0.122 -0.123 0.039 -0.131 -0.015
conflictman.07 -0.054 0.205 0.054 0.040 0.109 0.020 -0.047 0.614
conflictman.08 0.059 -0.045 0.191 0.171 0.193 -0.041 0.059 0.253
conflictman.09 -0.134 -0.003 0.094 0.615 0.211 0.029 0.002 0.036
conflictman.10 0.584 -0.083 0.235 0.070 -0.003 0.216 0.041 -0.030
conflictman.11 -0.014 0.003 -0.033 -0.015 0.907 0.061 0.028 0.034
conflictman.12 0.169 -0.157 -0.038 0.308 0.187 -0.133 -0.250 0.041
conflictman.13 0.053 0.064 -0.072 0.046 0.066 -0.028 0.746 -0.036
conflictman.14 0.058 0.059 -0.076 0.677 -0.195 0.070 0.071 0.000
conflictman.15 -0.014 0.420 0.337 0.073 0.123 0.027 0.025 -0.177
conflictman.16 0.016 0.021 -0.004 0.013 0.035 0.985 -0.010 -0.004
conflictman.17 0.457 -0.025 0.027 -0.004 -0.088 -0.048 0.131 0.266
conflictman.18 -0.026 0.075 0.748 0.033 -0.096 0.065 -0.088 0.040
conflictman.19 0.369 0.019 -0.284 -0.006 0.098 0.061 0.102 0.303
Component analysis (reproducing full covariance matrix)
TC3 TC1 TC2 TC6 TC8 TC7 TC4 TC5
conflictman.01 0.533 0.299 0.232 -0.277 0.131 0.063 -0.213 0.060
conflictman.02 0.093 -0.156 0.524 -0.262 0.158 0.118 0.409 -0.056
conflictman.03 -0.021 0.803 -0.042 0.087 -0.001 0.234 0.103 -0.161
conflictman.04 0.549 0.210 0.342 0.228 -0.123 -0.323 0.042 0.071
conflictman.05 0.123 0.562 -0.429 0.062 0.156 -0.342 0.192 0.109
conflictman.06 0.710 -0.039 -0.240 0.154 -0.075 0.056 -0.039 -0.028
conflictman.07 -0.202 0.177 -0.100 0.211 0.385 0.524 -0.032 0.069
conflictman.08 -0.128 0.001 0.093 -0.147 0.800 -0.047 -0.009 0.134
conflictman.09 -0.178 0.150 0.216 -0.090 0.054 0.138 0.481 0.440
conflictman.10 0.752 -0.063 0.040 -0.135 0.110 0.179 0.071 0.160
conflictman.11 -0.076 0.261 0.475 0.178 0.126 0.214 -0.329 0.374
conflictman.12 0.129 -0.134 -0.142 0.052 -0.009 -0.075 0.059 0.886
conflictman.13 0.022 0.005 0.774 0.197 0.083 -0.085 0.113 -0.160
conflictman.14 -0.007 0.079 0.023 0.049 -0.009 0.041 0.880 0.044
conflictman.15 0.007 0.770 0.127 -0.275 -0.033 -0.025 -0.023 0.001
conflictman.16 0.185 0.082 0.008 -0.010 -0.137 0.811 0.111 -0.054
conflictman.17 0.307 -0.058 -0.014 0.236 0.660 -0.122 0.057 -0.266
conflictman.18 0.199 0.223 -0.186 -0.672 0.213 0.188 0.009 -0.034
conflictman.19 0.188 0.008 0.067 0.688 0.205 0.240 -0.005 0.062
Item descriptives
mean median var sd IQR se min q1 q3 max skew kurt dip n NA valid
conflictman.01 3.1667 3 0.5674 0.7533 1 0.0794 1 2 4 4 -0.6094 0.0181 0.1778 90 0 90
conflictman.02 2.5889 3 0.7167 0.8466 1 0.0892 1 2 4 4 -0.115 -0.5358 0.1722 90 0 90
conflictman.03 3.2222 3 0.5119 0.7154 1 0.0754 1 2 4 4 -0.9212 1.4094 0.1778 90 0 90
conflictman.04 3.0889 3 0.5763 0.7591 1 0.08 1 2 4 4 -0.6236 0.2984 0.15 90 0 90
conflictman.05 3.3 3 0.5045 0.7103 1 0.0749 1 2 4 4 -0.7004 0.0241 0.2167 90 0 90
conflictman.06 3.2333 3 0.4281 0.6543 1 0.069 1 2 4 4 -0.5257 0.454 0.1722 90 0 90
conflictman.07 2.9778 3 0.4489 0.67 0 0.0706 1 2 4 4 -0.2038 -0.038 0.1 90 0 90
conflictman.08 3.0444 3 0.4699 0.6855 0 0.0723 1 2 4 4 -0.6986 1.3044 0.1111 90 0 90
conflictman.09 2.3444 2 0.7452 0.8632 1 0.091 1 1 3 4 -0.0931 -0.7727 0.1722 90 0 90
conflictman.10 3.4 3 0.4449 0.667 1 0.0703 1 2 4 4 -0.9014 0.7167 0.2167 90 0 90
conflictman.11 2.2222 2 1.0062 1.0031 2 0.1057 1 1 3 4 0.0832 -1.2431 0.1611 90 0 90
conflictman.12 2.6778 3 0.513 0.7162 1 0.0755 1 2 4 4 0.0045 -0.2822 0.1833 90 0 90
conflictman.13 1.9778 2 0.7635 0.8738 2 0.0921 1 1 3 4 0.457 -0.6678 0.1722 90 0 90
conflictman.14 2.9222 3 0.8141 0.9023 2 0.0951 1 2 4 4 -0.5953 -0.3014 0.1389 90 0 90
conflictman.15 3.0333 3 0.6169 0.7854 1 0.0828 1 2 4 4 -0.7707 0.6541 0.1333 90 0 90
conflictman.16 3.4333 4 0.6079 0.7797 1 0.0822 1 3 NA 4 -1.2282 0.7565 0.1389 90 0 90
conflictman.17 3.2111 3 0.5055 0.711 1 0.0749 1 2 4 4 -0.5224 -0.1597 0.1833 90 0 90
conflictman.18 3.5 4 0.4551 0.6746 1 0.0711 1 3 NA 4 -1.2353 1.2277 0.1667 90 0 90
conflictman.19 2.1444 2 0.934 0.9664 2 0.1019 1 1 3 4 0.391 -0.8328 0.15 90 0 90
Scattermatrix
Scatterplot

Scatterplot


## No viewer found, probably documenting or testing

Summary statistics

name data_type n_missing complete_rate min median max mean sd hist label
conflictman.01 numeric 0 1 1 3 4 3.166667 0.7532700 <U+2581><U+2582><U+2581><U+2587><U+2586> NA
conflictman.02 numeric 0 1 1 3 4 2.588889 0.8465985 <U+2582><U+2586><U+2581><U+2587><U+2582> NA
conflictman.03 numeric 0 1 1 3 4 3.222222 0.7154440 <U+2581><U+2581><U+2581><U+2587><U+2585> NA
conflictman.04 numeric 0 1 1 3 4 3.088889 0.7591309 <U+2581><U+2582><U+2581><U+2587><U+2585> NA
conflictman.05 numeric 0 1 1 3 4 3.300000 0.7102777 <U+2581><U+2582><U+2581><U+2587><U+2587> NA
conflictman.06 numeric 0 1 1 3 4 3.233333 0.6542858 <U+2581><U+2581><U+2581><U+2587><U+2585> NA
conflictman.07 numeric 0 1 1 3 4 2.977778 0.6700290 <U+2581><U+2583><U+2581><U+2587><U+2583> NA
conflictman.08 numeric 0 1 1 3 4 3.044444 0.6855017 <U+2581><U+2582><U+2581><U+2587><U+2583> NA
conflictman.09 numeric 0 1 1 2 4 2.344444 0.8632459 <U+2583><U+2587><U+2581><U+2587><U+2581> NA
conflictman.10 numeric 0 1 1 3 4 3.400000 0.6670411 <U+2581><U+2581><U+2581><U+2587><U+2587> NA
conflictman.11 numeric 0 1 1 2 4 2.222222 1.0031162 <U+2587><U+2585><U+2581><U+2587><U+2582> NA
conflictman.12 numeric 0 1 1 3 4 2.677778 0.7162289 <U+2581><U+2586><U+2581><U+2587><U+2582> NA
conflictman.13 numeric 0 1 1 2 4 1.977778 0.8738109 <U+2587><U+2587><U+2581><U+2585><U+2581> NA
conflictman.14 numeric 0 1 1 3 4 2.922222 0.9022790 <U+2582><U+2583><U+2581><U+2587><U+2585> NA
conflictman.15 numeric 0 1 1 3 4 3.033333 0.7854005 <U+2581><U+2582><U+2581><U+2587><U+2583> NA
conflictman.16 numeric 0 1 1 4 4 3.433333 0.7796571 <U+2581><U+2582><U+2581><U+2583><U+2587> NA
conflictman.17 numeric 0 1 1 3 4 3.211111 0.7109804 <U+2581><U+2582><U+2581><U+2587><U+2586> NA
conflictman.18 numeric 0 1 1 4 4 3.500000 0.6745785 <U+2581><U+2581><U+2581><U+2585><U+2587> NA
conflictman.19 numeric 0 1 1 2 4 2.144444 0.9664148 <U+2587><U+2587><U+2581><U+2586><U+2582> NA

Scale: TAM_bi

Overview

Reliability: .

Missing: 0.

Likert plot of scale TAM_bi items

Likert plot of scale TAM_bi items

Distribution of scale TAM_bi

Distribution of scale TAM_bi

Reliability details

## No viewer found, probably documenting or testing

Scale diagnosis
Reliability (internal consistency) estimates
Scale structure
Information about this scale
Dataframe: res$dat
Items: tam_bi.01, tam_bi.02, tam_bi.03, tam_bi.04 & tam_bi.05
Observations: 90
Positive correlations: 10
Number of correlations: 10
Percentage positive correlations: 100
Estimates assuming interval level
Omega (total): 0.94
Omega (hierarchical): 0.93
Revelle’s Omega (total): 0.94
Greatest Lower Bound (GLB): 0.95
Coefficient H: 0.97
Coefficient Alpha: 0.92

(Estimates assuming ordinal level not computed, as the polychoric correlation matrix has missing values.)

Note: the normal point estimate and confidence interval for omega are based on the procedure suggested by Dunn, Baguley & Brunsden (2013) using the MBESS function ci.reliability, whereas the psych package point estimate was suggested in Revelle & Zinbarg (2008). See the help (‘?ufs::scaleStructure’) for more information.

Eigen values

3.781, 0.645, 0.306, 0.201 & 0.067

Factor analysis (reproducing only shared variance)
ML1
tam_bi.01 0.956
tam_bi.02 0.972
tam_bi.03 0.613
tam_bi.04 0.753
tam_bi.05 0.866
Component analysis (reproducing full covariance matrix)
PC1
tam_bi.01 0.948
tam_bi.02 0.953
tam_bi.03 0.696
tam_bi.04 0.815
tam_bi.05 0.907
Item descriptives
mean median var sd IQR se min q1 q3 max skew kurt dip n NA valid
tam_bi.01 3.7778 4 3.7703 1.9417 3 0.2047 1 1 5 7 -0.0366 -1.0917 0.1 90 0 90
tam_bi.02 3.8444 4 3.3913 1.8415 3 0.1941 1 2 5 7 -0.1634 -0.9583 0.1 90 0 90
tam_bi.03 4.2667 5 3.1865 1.7851 2 0.1882 1 3 6 7 -0.4982 -0.7605 0.0833 90 0 90
tam_bi.04 3.3889 3 3.8808 1.97 4 0.2077 1 1 5 7 0.1514 -1.3458 0.0889 90 0 90
tam_bi.05 3.7778 4 3.7928 1.9475 3 0.2053 1 2 5 7 -0.0435 -1.1278 0.1 90 0 90
Scattermatrix
Scatterplot

Scatterplot


## No viewer found, probably documenting or testing

Summary statistics

name data_type n_missing complete_rate min median max mean sd hist label
tam_bi.01 numeric 0 1 1 4 7 3.777778 1.941723 <U+2587><U+2582><U+2586><U+2585><U+2585> NA
tam_bi.02 numeric 0 1 1 4 7 3.844444 1.841538 <U+2587><U+2583><U+2586><U+2587><U+2585> NA
tam_bi.03 numeric 0 1 1 5 7 4.266667 1.785082 <U+2585><U+2583><U+2582><U+2587><U+2586> NA
tam_bi.04 numeric 0 1 1 3 7 3.388889 1.969968 <U+2587><U+2582><U+2582><U+2583><U+2583> NA
tam_bi.05 numeric 0 1 1 4 7 3.777778 1.947501 <U+2587><U+2582><U+2585><U+2586><U+2585> NA

Scale: TAM_canx

Overview

Reliability: .

Missing: 0.

Likert plot of scale TAM_canx items

Likert plot of scale TAM_canx items

Distribution of scale TAM_canx

Distribution of scale TAM_canx

Reliability details

## No viewer found, probably documenting or testing

Scale diagnosis
Reliability (internal consistency) estimates
Scale structure
Information about this scale
Dataframe: res$dat
Items: tam_canx.01n, tam_canx.02, tam_canx.03 & tam_canx.04
Observations: 90
Positive correlations: 3
Number of correlations: 6
Percentage positive correlations: 50
Estimates assuming interval level
Omega (total): 0.95
Omega (hierarchical): 0.90
Revelle’s Omega (total): 0.95
Greatest Lower Bound (GLB): 0.88
Coefficient H: 0.97
Coefficient Alpha: 0.46

(Estimates assuming ordinal level not computed, as the polychoric correlation matrix has missing values.)

Note: the normal point estimate and confidence interval for omega are based on the procedure suggested by Dunn, Baguley & Brunsden (2013) using the MBESS function ci.reliability, whereas the psych package point estimate was suggested in Revelle & Zinbarg (2008). See the help (‘?ufs::scaleStructure’) for more information.

Eigen values

3.355, 0.435, 0.139 & 0.071

Factor analysis (reproducing only shared variance)
ML1
tam_canx.01n -0.725
tam_canx.02 0.899
tam_canx.03 0.967
tam_canx.04 0.957
Component analysis (reproducing full covariance matrix)
PC1
tam_canx.01n -0.816
tam_canx.02 0.918
tam_canx.03 0.958
tam_canx.04 0.963
Item descriptives
mean median var sd IQR se min q1 q3 max skew kurt dip n NA valid
tam_canx.01n 2.4556 2 1.7115 1.3082 2 0.1379 1 1 3 7 1.0691 1.2534 0.1278 90 0 90
tam_canx.02 5.4556 6 2.3856 1.5446 2 0.1628 1 5 7 7 -1.0469 0.7197 0.1556 90 0 90
tam_canx.03 5.2444 5.5 2.5463 1.5957 3 0.1682 1 4 7 7 -0.8018 -0.0643 0.1167 90 0 90
tam_canx.04 5.3222 6 2.5355 1.5923 2 0.1678 1 5 7 7 -0.8372 -0.1785 0.1278 90 0 90
Scattermatrix
Scatterplot

Scatterplot


## No viewer found, probably documenting or testing

Summary statistics

name data_type n_missing complete_rate min median max mean sd hist label
tam_canx.01n numeric 0 1 1 2.0 7 2.455556 1.308238 <U+2587><U+2583><U+2581><U+2581><U+2581> NA
tam_canx.02 numeric 0 1 1 6.0 7 5.455556 1.544553 <U+2581><U+2581><U+2581><U+2585><U+2587> NA
tam_canx.03 numeric 0 1 1 5.5 7 5.244444 1.595718 <U+2581><U+2581><U+2582><U+2583><U+2587> NA
tam_canx.04 numeric 0 1 1 6.0 7 5.322222 1.592311 <U+2581><U+2582><U+2581><U+2583><U+2587> NA

Scale: TAM_enj

Overview

Reliability: .

Missing: 0.

Likert plot of scale TAM_enj items

Likert plot of scale TAM_enj items

Distribution of scale TAM_enj

Distribution of scale TAM_enj

Reliability details

## No viewer found, probably documenting or testing

Scale diagnosis
Reliability (internal consistency) estimates
Scale structure
Information about this scale
Dataframe: res$dat
Items: tam_enj.01, tam_enj.02 & tam_enj.03
Observations: 90
Positive correlations: 3
Number of correlations: 3
Percentage positive correlations: 100
Estimates assuming interval level
Omega (total): 0.91
Omega (hierarchical): 0.00
Revelle’s Omega (total): 0.91
Greatest Lower Bound (GLB): 0.92
Coefficient H: 0.92
Coefficient Alpha: 0.91

(Estimates assuming ordinal level not computed, as the polychoric correlation matrix has missing values.)

Note: the normal point estimate and confidence interval for omega are based on the procedure suggested by Dunn, Baguley & Brunsden (2013) using the MBESS function ci.reliability, whereas the psych package point estimate was suggested in Revelle & Zinbarg (2008). See the help (‘?ufs::scaleStructure’) for more information.

Eigen values

2.541, 0.277 & 0.182

Factor analysis (reproducing only shared variance)
ML1
tam_enj.01 0.933
tam_enj.02 0.857
tam_enj.03 0.845
Component analysis (reproducing full covariance matrix)
PC1
tam_enj.01 0.939
tam_enj.02 0.913
tam_enj.03 0.909
Item descriptives
mean median var sd IQR se min q1 q3 max skew kurt dip n NA valid
tam_enj.01 4.0111 4 3.3819 1.839 2 0.1938 1 2 6 7 -0.2273 -0.9282 0.0889 90 0 90
tam_enj.02 4.1 4 2.8775 1.6963 2 0.1788 1 2 5 7 -0.3153 -0.4631 0.1333 90 0 90
tam_enj.03 3.9 4 2.9899 1.7291 2 0.1823 1 2 5 7 -0.1891 -0.7791 0.1167 90 0 90
Scattermatrix
Scatterplot

Scatterplot


## No viewer found, probably documenting or testing

Summary statistics

name data_type n_missing complete_rate min median max mean sd hist label
tam_enj.01 numeric 0 1 1 4 7 4.011111 1.838994 <U+2587><U+2585><U+2587><U+2586><U+2587> NA
tam_enj.02 numeric 0 1 1 4 7 4.100000 1.696328 <U+2586><U+2583><U+2587><U+2587><U+2585> NA
tam_enj.03 numeric 0 1 1 4 7 3.900000 1.729129 <U+2587><U+2583><U+2587><U+2587><U+2585> NA

Scale: TAM_img

Overview

Reliability: .

Missing: 0.

Likert plot of scale TAM_img items

Likert plot of scale TAM_img items

Distribution of scale TAM_img

Distribution of scale TAM_img

Reliability details

## No viewer found, probably documenting or testing

Scale diagnosis
Reliability (internal consistency) estimates
Scale structure
Information about this scale
Dataframe: res$dat
Items: tam_img.01, tam_img.02 & tam_img.03
Observations: 90
Positive correlations: 3
Number of correlations: 3
Percentage positive correlations: 100
Estimates assuming interval level
Omega (total): 0.90
Omega (hierarchical): 0.03
Revelle’s Omega (total): 0.90
Greatest Lower Bound (GLB): 0.91
Coefficient H: 0.91
Coefficient Alpha: 0.90

(Estimates assuming ordinal level not computed, as the polychoric correlation matrix has missing values.)

Note: the normal point estimate and confidence interval for omega are based on the procedure suggested by Dunn, Baguley & Brunsden (2013) using the MBESS function ci.reliability, whereas the psych package point estimate was suggested in Revelle & Zinbarg (2008). See the help (‘?ufs::scaleStructure’) for more information.

Eigen values

2.498, 0.309 & 0.193

Factor analysis (reproducing only shared variance)
ML1
tam_img.01 0.920
tam_img.02 0.805
tam_img.03 0.873
Component analysis (reproducing full covariance matrix)
PC1
tam_img.01 0.931
tam_img.02 0.890
tam_img.03 0.916
Item descriptives
mean median var sd IQR se min q1 q3 max skew kurt dip n NA valid
tam_img.01 3.7778 4 3.1635 1.7786 3 0.1875 1 2 5 7 -0.1211 -1.1082 0.075 90 0 90
tam_img.02 3.9889 4 2.9325 1.7124 2 0.1805 1 2 5 7 -0.257 -0.8677 0.0833 90 0 90
tam_img.03 4.0778 4 3.1512 1.7752 2 0.1871 1 2 6 7 -0.268 -0.9258 0.1 90 0 90
Scattermatrix
Scatterplot

Scatterplot


## No viewer found, probably documenting or testing

Summary statistics

name data_type n_missing complete_rate min median max mean sd hist label
tam_img.01 numeric 0 1 1 4 7 3.777778 1.778636 <U+2587><U+2583><U+2583><U+2587><U+2585> NA
tam_img.02 numeric 0 1 1 4 7 3.988889 1.712443 <U+2586><U+2583><U+2585><U+2587><U+2585> NA
tam_img.03 numeric 0 1 1 4 7 4.077778 1.775158 <U+2587><U+2582><U+2587><U+2586><U+2587> NA

Scale: TAM_pec

Overview

Reliability: .

Missing: 0.

Likert plot of scale TAM_pec items

Likert plot of scale TAM_pec items

Distribution of scale TAM_pec

Distribution of scale TAM_pec

Reliability details

## No viewer found, probably documenting or testing

Scale diagnosis
Reliability (internal consistency) estimates
Scale structure
Information about this scale
Dataframe: res$dat
Items: tam_pec.01, tam_pec.02, tam_pec.03 & tam_pec.04
Observations: 90
Positive correlations: 3
Number of correlations: 6
Percentage positive correlations: 50
Estimates assuming interval level
Omega (total): 0.58
Omega (hierarchical): 0.20
Revelle’s Omega (total): 0.58
Greatest Lower Bound (GLB): 0.69
Coefficient H: 0.87
Coefficient Alpha: 0.44

(Estimates assuming ordinal level not computed, as the polychoric correlation matrix has missing values.)

Note: the normal point estimate and confidence interval for omega are based on the procedure suggested by Dunn, Baguley & Brunsden (2013) using the MBESS function ci.reliability, whereas the psych package point estimate was suggested in Revelle & Zinbarg (2008). See the help (‘?ufs::scaleStructure’) for more information.

Eigen values

2.27, 0.932, 0.499 & 0.298

Factor analysis (reproducing only shared variance)
ML1
tam_pec.01 0.608
tam_pec.02 0.758
tam_pec.03 0.911
tam_pec.04 -0.323
Component analysis (reproducing full covariance matrix)
PC1
tam_pec.01 0.739
tam_pec.02 0.854
tam_pec.03 0.893
tam_pec.04 -0.447
Item descriptives
mean median var sd IQR se min q1 q3 max skew kurt dip n NA valid
tam_pec.01 4.5111 5 2.5448 1.5952 3 0.1682 1 3 6 7 -0.4622 -0.3519 0.0833 90 0 90
tam_pec.02 4.9667 5 1.8978 1.3776 2 0.1452 1 4 6 7 -0.4928 -0.0704 0.1222 90 0 90
tam_pec.03 4.9778 5 1.9321 1.39 2 0.1465 1 4 6 7 -0.9351 0.786 0.1389 90 0 90
tam_pec.04 3.4556 4 2.3632 1.5373 2 0.162 1 2 6 7 0.3323 0.0209 0.0889 90 0 90
Scattermatrix
Scatterplot

Scatterplot


## No viewer found, probably documenting or testing

Summary statistics

name data_type n_missing complete_rate min median max mean sd hist label
tam_pec.01 numeric 0 1 1 5 7 4.511111 1.595249 <U+2583><U+2583><U+2585><U+2587><U+2587> NA
tam_pec.02 numeric 0 1 1 5 7 4.966667 1.377590 <U+2581><U+2582><U+2585><U+2586><U+2587> NA
tam_pec.03 numeric 0 1 1 5 7 4.977778 1.389995 <U+2582><U+2581><U+2583><U+2587><U+2587> NA
tam_pec.04 numeric 0 1 1 4 7 3.455556 1.537261 <U+2586><U+2583><U+2587><U+2581><U+2582> NA

Scale: TAM_pu

Overview

Reliability: .

Missing: 0.

Likert plot of scale TAM_pu items

Likert plot of scale TAM_pu items

Distribution of scale TAM_pu

Distribution of scale TAM_pu

Reliability details

## No viewer found, probably documenting or testing

Scale diagnosis
Reliability (internal consistency) estimates
Scale structure
Information about this scale
Dataframe: res$dat
Items: tam_pu.01, tam_pu.02, tam_pu.03 & tam_pu.04
Observations: 90
Positive correlations: 6
Number of correlations: 6
Percentage positive correlations: 100
Estimates assuming interval level
Omega (total): 0.06
Omega (hierarchical): 0.05
Revelle’s Omega (total): 0.06
Greatest Lower Bound (GLB): 0.97
Coefficient H: 0.98
Coefficient Alpha: 0.97

(Estimates assuming ordinal level not computed, as the polychoric correlation matrix has missing values.)

Note: the normal point estimate and confidence interval for omega are based on the procedure suggested by Dunn, Baguley & Brunsden (2013) using the MBESS function ci.reliability, whereas the psych package point estimate was suggested in Revelle & Zinbarg (2008). See the help (‘?ufs::scaleStructure’) for more information.

Eigen values

3.685, 0.146, 0.102 & 0.068

Factor analysis (reproducing only shared variance)
ML1
tam_pu.01 0.972
tam_pu.02 0.956
tam_pu.03 0.936
tam_pu.04 0.921
Component analysis (reproducing full covariance matrix)
PC1
tam_pu.01 0.973
tam_pu.02 0.965
tam_pu.03 0.955
tam_pu.04 0.946
Item descriptives
mean median var sd IQR se min q1 q3 max skew kurt dip n NA valid
tam_pu.01 5.0333 5 2.6843 1.6384 2 0.1727 1 3 6 7 -1.0423 0.7239 0.1278 90 0 90
tam_pu.02 5.1111 5 2.7291 1.652 1 0.1741 1 3 6 7 -1.0835 0.8386 0.1167 90 0 90
tam_pu.03 4.9667 5 2.9764 1.7252 2 0.1819 1 3 7 7 -0.8739 0.2273 0.1111 90 0 90
tam_pu.04 4.8778 5 2.6478 1.6272 2 0.1715 1 4 6 7 -0.9026 0.3771 0.1167 90 0 90
Scattermatrix
Scatterplot

Scatterplot


## No viewer found, probably documenting or testing

Summary statistics

name data_type n_missing complete_rate min median max mean sd hist label
tam_pu.01 numeric 0 1 1 5 7 5.033333 1.638374 <U+2582><U+2581><U+2582><U+2586><U+2587> NA
tam_pu.02 numeric 0 1 1 5 7 5.111111 1.651995 <U+2582><U+2581><U+2582><U+2586><U+2587> NA
tam_pu.03 numeric 0 1 1 5 7 4.966667 1.725226 <U+2582><U+2581><U+2582><U+2587><U+2587> NA
tam_pu.04 numeric 0 1 1 5 7 4.877778 1.627211 <U+2582><U+2581><U+2583><U+2586><U+2587> NA

Scale: TAM_rel

Overview

Reliability: .

Missing: 0.

Likert plot of scale TAM_rel items

Likert plot of scale TAM_rel items

Distribution of scale TAM_rel

Distribution of scale TAM_rel

Reliability details

## No viewer found, probably documenting or testing

Scale diagnosis
Reliability (internal consistency) estimates
Scale structure
Information about this scale
Dataframe: res$dat
Items: tam_rel.01, tam_rel.02 & tam_rel.03
Observations: 90
Positive correlations: 3
Number of correlations: 3
Percentage positive correlations: 100
Estimates assuming interval level
Omega (total): 0.95
Omega (hierarchical): 0.02
Revelle’s Omega (total): 0.95
Greatest Lower Bound (GLB): 0.96
Coefficient H: 0.96
Coefficient Alpha: 0.95

(Estimates assuming ordinal level not computed, as the polychoric correlation matrix has missing values.)

Note: the normal point estimate and confidence interval for omega are based on the procedure suggested by Dunn, Baguley & Brunsden (2013) using the MBESS function ci.reliability, whereas the psych package point estimate was suggested in Revelle & Zinbarg (2008). See the help (‘?ufs::scaleStructure’) for more information.

Eigen values

2.73, 0.174 & 0.096

Factor analysis (reproducing only shared variance)
ML1
tam_rel.01 0.931
tam_rel.02 0.966
tam_rel.03 0.893
Component analysis (reproducing full covariance matrix)
PC1
tam_rel.01 0.955
tam_rel.02 0.966
tam_rel.03 0.941
Item descriptives
mean median var sd IQR se min q1 q3 max skew kurt dip n NA valid
tam_rel.01 4.4556 5 3.307 1.8185 3 0.1917 1 2 6 7 -0.5804 -0.7253 0.1167 90 0 90
tam_rel.02 4.6 5 3.0067 1.734 2 0.1828 1 3 6 7 -0.7871 -0.2594 0.1333 90 0 90
tam_rel.03 4.5 5 2.6573 1.6301 1 0.1718 1 3 6 7 -0.8197 -0.0592 0.0889 90 0 90
Scattermatrix
Scatterplot

Scatterplot


## No viewer found, probably documenting or testing

Summary statistics

name data_type n_missing complete_rate min median max mean sd hist label
tam_rel.01 numeric 0 1 1 5 7 4.455556 1.818513 <U+2585><U+2581><U+2583><U+2586><U+2587> NA
tam_rel.02 numeric 0 1 1 5 7 4.600000 1.733996 <U+2583><U+2582><U+2583><U+2586><U+2587> NA
tam_rel.03 numeric 0 1 1 5 7 4.500000 1.630124 <U+2583><U+2582><U+2582><U+2587><U+2585> NA

Scale: TAM_res

Overview

Reliability: .

Missing: 0.

Likert plot of scale TAM_res items

Likert plot of scale TAM_res items

Distribution of scale TAM_res

Distribution of scale TAM_res

Reliability details

## No viewer found, probably documenting or testing

Scale diagnosis
Reliability (internal consistency) estimates
Scale structure
Information about this scale
Dataframe: res$dat
Items: tam_res.01, tam_res.02, tam_res.03 & tam_res.04
Observations: 90
Positive correlations: 3
Number of correlations: 6
Percentage positive correlations: 50
Estimates assuming interval level
Omega (total): 0.80
Omega (hierarchical): 0.57
Revelle’s Omega (total): 0.80
Greatest Lower Bound (GLB): 0.60
Coefficient H: 0.73
Coefficient Alpha: -0.02

(Estimates assuming ordinal level not computed, as the polychoric correlation matrix has missing values.)

Note: the normal point estimate and confidence interval for omega are based on the procedure suggested by Dunn, Baguley & Brunsden (2013) using the MBESS function ci.reliability, whereas the psych package point estimate was suggested in Revelle & Zinbarg (2008). See the help (‘?ufs::scaleStructure’) for more information.

Eigen values

2.105, 1.043, 0.444 & 0.409

Factor analysis (reproducing only shared variance)
ML1 ML2
tam_res.01 -0.096 0.768
tam_res.02 0.831 -0.009
tam_res.03 0.143 0.706
tam_res.04 -0.675 -0.034
Component analysis (reproducing full covariance matrix)
TC1 TC2
tam_res.01 -0.108 0.937
tam_res.02 0.875 0.023
tam_res.03 0.201 0.791
tam_res.04 -0.887 0.014
Item descriptives
mean median var sd IQR se min q1 q3 max skew kurt dip n NA valid
tam_res.01 5.1111 5 2.3471 1.532 2 0.1615 1 3 6 7 -1.0347 0.7241 0.1333 90 0 90
tam_res.02 5.4667 5 1.0157 1.0078 1 0.1062 2 3 6 7 -0.7151 1.3527 0.1667 90 0 90
tam_res.03 5.5333 6 1.4427 1.2011 1 0.1266 1 5 7 7 -0.7367 0.8957 0.1278 90 0 90
tam_res.04 2.9 3 2.0236 1.4225 2 0.1499 1 2 5 7 0.7789 0.1256 0.15 90 0 90
Scattermatrix
Scatterplot

Scatterplot


## No viewer found, probably documenting or testing

Summary statistics

name data_type n_missing complete_rate min median max mean sd hist label
tam_res.01 numeric 0 1 1 5 7 5.111111 1.532014 <U+2581><U+2581><U+2582><U+2585><U+2587> NA
tam_res.02 numeric 0 1 2 5 7 5.466667 1.007834 <U+2581><U+2581><U+2587><U+2586><U+2582> NA
tam_res.03 numeric 0 1 1 6 7 5.533333 1.201123 <U+2581><U+2581><U+2582><U+2583><U+2587> NA
tam_res.04 numeric 0 1 1 3 7 2.900000 1.422531 <U+2587><U+2586><U+2582><U+2582><U+2581> NA

Scale: TAM_sn

Overview

Reliability: .

Missing: 0.

Likert plot of scale TAM_sn items

Likert plot of scale TAM_sn items

Distribution of scale TAM_sn

Distribution of scale TAM_sn

Reliability details

## No viewer found, probably documenting or testing

Scale diagnosis
Reliability (internal consistency) estimates
Scale structure
Information about this scale
Dataframe: res$dat
Items: tam_sn.01, tam_sn.02, tam_sn.03 & tam_sn.04
Observations: 90
Positive correlations: 6
Number of correlations: 6
Percentage positive correlations: 100
Estimates assuming interval level
Omega (total): 0.83
Omega (hierarchical): 0.69
Revelle’s Omega (total): 0.83
Greatest Lower Bound (GLB): 0.83
Coefficient H: 0.86
Coefficient Alpha: 0.76

(Estimates assuming ordinal level not computed, as the polychoric correlation matrix has missing values.)

Note: the normal point estimate and confidence interval for omega are based on the procedure suggested by Dunn, Baguley & Brunsden (2013) using the MBESS function ci.reliability, whereas the psych package point estimate was suggested in Revelle & Zinbarg (2008). See the help (‘?ufs::scaleStructure’) for more information.

Eigen values

2.376, 0.824, 0.52 & 0.28

Factor analysis (reproducing only shared variance)
ML1
tam_sn.01 0.771
tam_sn.02 0.897
tam_sn.03 0.618
tam_sn.04 0.380
Component analysis (reproducing full covariance matrix)
PC1
tam_sn.01 0.813
tam_sn.02 0.863
tam_sn.03 0.786
tam_sn.04 0.595
Item descriptives
mean median var sd IQR se min q1 q3 max skew kurt dip n NA valid
tam_sn.01 3.3778 4 2.2602 1.5034 2 0.1585 1 2 5 6 -0.1448 -0.9941 0.0889 90 0 90
tam_sn.02 3.1 3 2.1809 1.4768 2 0.1557 1 2 5 7 0.2308 -0.7954 0.1056 90 0 90
tam_sn.03 4.2444 5 2.1643 1.4712 2 0.1551 1 3 6 7 -0.5651 -0.0408 0.1111 90 0 90
tam_sn.04 3.8556 4 2.462 1.5691 2 0.1654 1 3 5 7 -0.1481 -1.0163 0.1222 90 0 90
Scattermatrix
Scatterplot

Scatterplot


## No viewer found, probably documenting or testing

Summary statistics

name data_type n_missing complete_rate min median max mean sd hist label
tam_sn.01 numeric 0 1 1 4 6 3.377778 1.503388 <U+2587><U+2583><U+2587><U+2585><U+2582> NA
tam_sn.02 numeric 0 1 1 3 7 3.100000 1.476787 <U+2587><U+2585><U+2583><U+2583><U+2581> NA
tam_sn.03 numeric 0 1 1 5 7 4.244444 1.471154 <U+2583><U+2582><U+2585><U+2587><U+2583> NA
tam_sn.04 numeric 0 1 1 4 7 3.855556 1.569091 <U+2586><U+2587><U+2583><U+2587><U+2585> NA

Scale: TAM_vol

Overview

Reliability: .

Missing: 0.

## Error in likert::likert(as.data.frame(items)): All items (columns) must have the same number of levels
Distribution of scale TAM_vol

Distribution of scale TAM_vol

Reliability details

## No viewer found, probably documenting or testing

Scale diagnosis
Reliability (internal consistency) estimates
Scale structure
Information about this scale
Dataframe: res$dat
Items: tam_vol.01, tam_vol.02 & tam_vol.03
Observations: 90
Positive correlations: 3
Number of correlations: 3
Percentage positive correlations: 100
Estimates assuming interval level
Omega (total): 0.81
Omega (hierarchical): 0.04
Revelle’s Omega (total): 0.81
Greatest Lower Bound (GLB): 0.82
Coefficient H: 0.82
Coefficient Alpha: 0.79

(Estimates assuming ordinal level not computed, as the polychoric correlation matrix has missing values.)

Note: the normal point estimate and confidence interval for omega are based on the procedure suggested by Dunn, Baguley & Brunsden (2013) using the MBESS function ci.reliability, whereas the psych package point estimate was suggested in Revelle & Zinbarg (2008). See the help (‘?ufs::scaleStructure’) for more information.

Eigen values

2.149, 0.491 & 0.36

Factor analysis (reproducing only shared variance)
ML1
tam_vol.01 0.684
tam_vol.02 0.833
tam_vol.03 0.760
Component analysis (reproducing full covariance matrix)
PC1
tam_vol.01 0.816
tam_vol.02 0.872
tam_vol.03 0.850
Item descriptives
mean median var sd IQR se min q1 q3 max skew kurt dip n NA valid
tam_vol.01 6.6111 7 0.7797 0.883 0 0.0931 2 6 NA 7 -3.0506 10.8505 0.0722 90 0 90
tam_vol.02 6.5889 7 0.7841 0.8855 1 0.0933 2 6 NA 7 -2.9569 10.381 0.0833 90 0 90
tam_vol.03 6.1444 7 1.5632 1.2503 1 0.1318 2 6 NA 7 -1.8672 3.4238 0.1333 90 0 90
Scattermatrix
Scatterplot

Scatterplot


## No viewer found, probably documenting or testing

Summary statistics

name data_type n_missing complete_rate min median max mean sd hist label
tam_vol.01 numeric 0 1 2 7 7 6.611111 0.8829782 <U+2581><U+2581><U+2581><U+2582><U+2587> NA
tam_vol.02 numeric 0 1 2 7 7 6.588889 0.8855195 <U+2581><U+2581><U+2581><U+2582><U+2587> NA
tam_vol.03 numeric 0 1 2 7 7 6.144444 1.2502684 <U+2581><U+2581><U+2582><U+2583><U+2587> NA

Missingness report

Codebook table