Codebook timepoint 1

Here, we’re just setting a few options.

Now, we’re preparing our data for the codebook.

Create codebook

codebook(codebook_data,
                    detailed_variables = TRUE,
                    detailed_scales = TRUE,
         metadata_json = FALSE)

## Loading required namespace: GPArotation

Metadata

Description

Dataset name: codebook_data

The dataset has N=90 rows and 223 columns. 1 rows have no missing values on any column.

Metadata for search engines

• Date published: 2023-03-30

x ID prolific_pid loginID loginPassword idcodefinal dummy_informedconsent check_caminst dummy_honestycontract sociodemo_age sociodemo_gender sociodemo_education sociodemo_impexp sociodemo_impexpwho sociodemo_country sociodemo_faith panas.01p panas.02p panas.03p panas.04p panas.05p panas.06p panas.07p panas.08p panas.09p panas.10p panas.01n panas.02n panas.03n panas.04n panas.05n panas.06n panas.07n panas.08n panas.09n panas.10n tam_bi.01 tam_bi.02 tam_bi.03 tam_bi.04 tam_bi.05 tam_canx.01n tam_canx.02 tam_canx.03 tam_canx.04 tam_enj.01 tam_enj.02 tam_enj.03 tam_img.01 tam_img.02 tam_img.03 tam_pec.01 tam_pec.02 tam_pec.03 tam_pec.04 tam_pu.01 tam_pu.02 tam_pu.03 tam_pu.04 tam_rel.01 tam_rel.02 tam_rel.03 tam_res.01 tam_res.02 tam_res.03 tam_res.04 tam_sn.01 tam_sn.02 tam_sn.03 tam_sn.04 tam_vol.01 tam_vol.02 tam_vol.03 relativist01 relativist02 relativist03 relativist04 relativist05 contractualist01 contractualist02 contractualist03 contractualist04 contractualist05 contractualist06 contractualist07 hedonism01 hedonism02 hedonism03 hedonism04 hedonism05 hedonism06 hedonism07 hedonism08 hedonism09 hedonism10 utilitarian01 utilitarian02 utilitarian03 utilitarian04 utilitarian05 utilitarian06 utilitarian07 utilitarian08 utilitarian09 deontology01 deontology02 deontology03 deontology04 deontology05 deontology06 deontology07 deontology08 virtue01 virtue02 virtue03 virtue04 virtue05 virtue06 virtue07 virtue08 virtue09 conflictman.01 conflictman.02 conflictman.03 conflictman.04 conflictman.05 conflictman.06 conflictman.07 conflictman.08 conflictman.09 conflictman.10 conflictman.11 conflictman.12 conflictman.13 conflictman.14 conflictman.15 conflictman.16 conflictman.17 conflictman.18 conflictman.19 featurestechnologyfeelings.01 featurestechnologyfeelings.02 featurestechnologyfeelings.03 featurestechnologyfeelings.04 featurestechnologyfeelings.05 featurestechnologyfeelings.06 outcomerating_useful.01 outcomerating_good.01 outcomedummy_moral outcomedummy_insurance outcomedummy_funds outcomedummy_prohibited ques_mostimpnode feedCAM_repres feedCAM_technicalprobs feedCAM_technicalprobsText feedCAM_stopdrawing feedCAM_stopdrawingText feedCAM_already feedCAM_alreadyText feedback_critic paradefocus durationtotal sociodemo_studentdummy sociodemo_employment duration_06scenariotext duration_10caminstruct1 duration_07quesTechnologicalImplant countclicks_07quesTechnologicalImplant duration_ethicscale_01 countclicks_ethicscale_01 duration_ethicscale_02 countclicks_ethicscale_02 duration_ethicscale_03 countclicks_ethicscale_03 duration_ethicscale_04 countclicks_ethicscale_04 duration_ethicscale_05 countclicks_ethicscale_05 duration_XXquesTAM_rel02 countclicks_XXquesTAM_rel02 duration_XXquesTAM_vol10 countclicks_XXquesTAM_vol10 duration_XXquesTAM_img03 countclicks_XXquesTAM_img03 duration_XXquesTAM_enj09 countclicks_XXquesTAM_enj09 duration_XXquesTAM_canx08 countclicks_XXquesTAM_canx08 duration_XXquesTAM_pec07 countclicks_XXquesTAM_pec07 duration_XXquesTAM_bi04 countclicks_XXquesTAM_bi04 duration_XXquesTAM_pu05 countclicks_XXquesTAM_pu05 duration_XXquesTAM_res01 countclicks_XXquesTAM_res01 duration_XXquesTAM_sn06 countclicks_XXquesTAM_sn06 duration_quesPANAS01 duration_quesPANAS02 duration_XXquesConflictMan01 countclicks_XXquesConflictMan01 duration_XXquesConflictMan02 countclicks_XXquesConflictMan02 relativist contractualist hedonism utilitarian deontology virtue panas_negative panas_positive conflictman TAM_bi TAM_canx TAM_enj TAM_img TAM_pec TAM_pu TAM_rel TAM_res TAM_sn TAM_vol

#Variables

ID

Distribution

Distribution of values for ID

0 missing values.

Summary statistics

name	data_type	n_missing	complete_rate	n_unique	empty	min	max	whitespace	label
ID	character	0	1	80	0	1	2	0	NA

prolific_pid

Distribution

Distribution of values for prolific_pid

0 missing values.

Summary statistics

name	data_type	n_missing	complete_rate	n_unique	empty	min	max	whitespace	label
prolific_pid	character	0	1	90	0	24	24	0	NA

loginID

Distribution

Distribution of values for loginID

0 missing values.

Summary statistics

name	data_type	n_missing	complete_rate	n_unique	empty	min	max	whitespace	label
loginID	character	0	1	90	0	6	6	0	NA

loginPassword

Distribution

Distribution of values for loginPassword

0 missing values.

Summary statistics

name	data_type	n_missing	complete_rate	n_unique	empty	min	max	whitespace	label
loginPassword	character	0	1	87	0	3	3	0	NA

idcodefinal

Distribution

Distribution of values for idcodefinal

0 missing values.

Summary statistics

name	data_type	n_missing	complete_rate	n_unique	empty	min	max	whitespace	label
idcodefinal	character	0	1	90	0	10	22	0	NA

dummy_informedconsent

Distribution

Distribution of values for dummy_informedconsent

0 missing values.

Summary statistics

name	data_type	n_missing	complete_rate	n_unique	empty	min	max	whitespace	label
dummy_informedconsent	character	0	1	1	0	1	1	0	NA

check_caminst

Distribution

Distribution of values for check_caminst

78 missing values.

Summary statistics

name	data_type	n_missing	complete_rate	min	median	max	mean	sd	hist	label
check_caminst	numeric	78	0.1333333	1	1	2	1.166667	0.3892495	<U+2587><U+2581><U+2581><U+2581><U+2582>	NA

dummy_honestycontract

Distribution

Distribution of values for dummy_honestycontract

0 missing values.

Summary statistics

name	data_type	n_missing	complete_rate	min	median	max	mean	sd	hist	label
dummy_honestycontract	numeric	0	1	1	1	1	1	0	<U+2581><U+2581><U+2587><U+2581><U+2581>	NA

sociodemo_age

Distribution

Distribution of values for sociodemo_age

0 missing values.

Summary statistics

name	data_type	n_missing	complete_rate	min	median	max	mean	sd	hist	label
sociodemo_age	numeric	0	1	19	32	72	33.31111	12.23978	<U+2587><U+2586><U+2582><U+2581><U+2581>	NA

sociodemo_gender

Distribution

Distribution of values for sociodemo_gender

0 missing values.

Summary statistics

name	data_type	n_missing	complete_rate	n_unique	empty	min	max	whitespace	label
sociodemo_gender	character	0	1	3	0	4	8	0	NA

sociodemo_education

Distribution

Distribution of values for sociodemo_education

0 missing values.

Summary statistics

name	data_type	n_missing	complete_rate	n_unique	empty	min	max	whitespace	label
sociodemo_education	character	0	1	6	1	0	10	0	NA

sociodemo_impexp

Distribution

Distribution of values for sociodemo_impexp

0 missing values.

Summary statistics

name	data_type	n_missing	complete_rate	n_unique	empty	min	max	whitespace	label
sociodemo_impexp	character	0	1	2	0	2	3	0	NA

sociodemo_impexpwho

Distribution

Distribution of values for sociodemo_impexpwho

86 missing values.

Summary statistics

name	data_type	n_missing	complete_rate	n_unique	empty	min	max	whitespace	label
sociodemo_impexpwho	character	86	0.0444444	3	0	5	6	0	NA

sociodemo_country

Distribution

Distribution of values for sociodemo_country

0 missing values.

Summary statistics

name	data_type	n_missing	complete_rate	n_unique	empty	min	max	whitespace	label
sociodemo_country	character	0	1	11	0	5	24	0	NA

sociodemo_faith

Distribution

Distribution of values for sociodemo_faith

0 missing values.

Summary statistics

name	data_type	n_missing	complete_rate	n_unique	empty	min	max	whitespace	label
sociodemo_faith	character	0	1	4	0	1	1	0	NA

featurestechnologyfeelings.01

Distribution

Distribution of values for featurestechnologyfeelings.01

0 missing values.

Summary statistics

name	data_type	n_missing	complete_rate	min	median	max	mean	sd	hist	label
featurestechnologyfeelings.01	numeric	0	1	2	7	7	6.311111	0.9318876	<U+2581><U+2581><U+2581><U+2585><U+2587>	NA

featurestechnologyfeelings.02

Distribution

Distribution of values for featurestechnologyfeelings.02

0 missing values.

Summary statistics

name	data_type	n_missing	complete_rate	min	median	max	mean	sd	hist	label
featurestechnologyfeelings.02	numeric	0	1	3	6	7	5.933333	0.9921037	<U+2581><U+2582><U+2583><U+2587><U+2587>	NA

featurestechnologyfeelings.03

Distribution

Distribution of values for featurestechnologyfeelings.03

0 missing values.

Summary statistics

name	data_type	n_missing	complete_rate	min	median	max	mean	sd	hist	label
featurestechnologyfeelings.03	numeric	0	1	2	7	7	6.277778	0.9364981	<U+2581><U+2581><U+2582><U+2585><U+2587>	NA

featurestechnologyfeelings.04

Distribution

Distribution of values for featurestechnologyfeelings.04

0 missing values.

Summary statistics

name	data_type	n_missing	complete_rate	min	median	max	mean	sd	hist	label
featurestechnologyfeelings.04	numeric	0	1	1	7	7	5.933333	1.444089	<U+2581><U+2581><U+2581><U+2581><U+2587>	NA

featurestechnologyfeelings.05

Distribution

Distribution of values for featurestechnologyfeelings.05

0 missing values.

Summary statistics

name	data_type	n_missing	complete_rate	min	median	max	mean	sd	hist	label
featurestechnologyfeelings.05	numeric	0	1	1	6	7	5.966667	1.136227	<U+2581><U+2581><U+2581><U+2582><U+2587>	NA

featurestechnologyfeelings.06

Distribution

Distribution of values for featurestechnologyfeelings.06

0 missing values.

Summary statistics

name	data_type	n_missing	complete_rate	min	median	max	mean	sd	hist	label
featurestechnologyfeelings.06	numeric	0	1	4	6	7	6.111111	1.010556	<U+2582><U+2582><U+2581><U+2586><U+2587>	NA

outcomerating_useful.01

Distribution

Distribution of values for outcomerating_useful.01

0 missing values.

Summary statistics

name	data_type	n_missing	complete_rate	min	median	max	mean	sd	hist	label
outcomerating_useful.01	numeric	0	1	1	3	5	3.3	1.054152	<U+2581><U+2585><U+2587><U+2587><U+2583>	NA

outcomerating_good.01

Distribution

Distribution of values for outcomerating_good.01

0 missing values.

Summary statistics

name	data_type	n_missing	complete_rate	min	median	max	mean	sd	hist	label
outcomerating_good.01	numeric	0	1	1	3	5	3.177778	1.117559	<U+2582><U+2583><U+2587><U+2587><U+2582>	NA

outcomedummy_moral

Distribution

Distribution of values for outcomedummy_moral

0 missing values.

Summary statistics

name	data_type	n_missing	complete_rate	min	median	max	mean	sd	hist	label
outcomedummy_moral	numeric	0	1	0	0	1	0.4666667	0.5016826	<U+2587><U+2581><U+2581><U+2581><U+2587>	NA

outcomedummy_insurance

Distribution

Distribution of values for outcomedummy_insurance

0 missing values.

Summary statistics

name	data_type	n_missing	complete_rate	min	median	max	mean	sd	hist	label
outcomedummy_insurance	numeric	0	1	0	1	1	0.5111111	0.502677	<U+2587><U+2581><U+2581><U+2581><U+2587>	NA

outcomedummy_funds

Distribution

Distribution of values for outcomedummy_funds

0 missing values.

Summary statistics

name	data_type	n_missing	complete_rate	min	median	max	mean	sd	hist	label
outcomedummy_funds	numeric	0	1	0	0	1	0.4777778	0.5023043	<U+2587><U+2581><U+2581><U+2581><U+2587>	NA

outcomedummy_prohibited

Distribution

Distribution of values for outcomedummy_prohibited

0 missing values.

Summary statistics

name	data_type	n_missing	complete_rate	min	median	max	mean	sd	hist	label
outcomedummy_prohibited	numeric	0	1	0	0	1	0.2	0.4022409	<U+2587><U+2581><U+2581><U+2581><U+2582>	NA

ques_mostimpnode

Distribution

Distribution of values for ques_mostimpnode

0 missing values.

Summary statistics

name	data_type	n_missing	complete_rate	n_unique	empty	min	max	whitespace	label
ques_mostimpnode	character	0	1	81	0	4	41	0	NA

feedCAM_repres

Distribution

Distribution of values for feedCAM_repres

0 missing values.

Summary statistics

name	data_type	n_missing	complete_rate	min	median	max	mean	sd	hist	label
feedCAM_repres	numeric	0	1	2	6	7	6.033333	0.8798621	<U+2581><U+2581><U+2583><U+2587><U+2585>	NA

feedCAM_technicalprobs

Distribution

Distribution of values for feedCAM_technicalprobs

0 missing values.

Summary statistics

name	data_type	n_missing	complete_rate	min	median	max	mean	sd	hist	label
feedCAM_technicalprobs	numeric	0	1	0	0	1	0.2111111	0.4103833	<U+2587><U+2581><U+2581><U+2581><U+2582>	NA

feedCAM_technicalprobsText

Distribution

Distribution of values for feedCAM_technicalprobsText

0 missing values.

Summary statistics

name	data_type	n_missing	complete_rate	n_unique	empty	min	max	whitespace	label
feedCAM_technicalprobsText	character	0	1	20	71	0	201	0	NA

feedCAM_stopdrawing

Distribution

Distribution of values for feedCAM_stopdrawing

0 missing values.

Summary statistics

name	data_type	n_missing	complete_rate	min	median	max	mean	sd	hist	label
feedCAM_stopdrawing	numeric	0	1	0	0	1	0.0555556	0.2303447	<U+2587><U+2581><U+2581><U+2581><U+2581>	NA

feedCAM_stopdrawingText

Distribution

Distribution of values for feedCAM_stopdrawingText

0 missing values.

Summary statistics

name	data_type	n_missing	complete_rate	n_unique	empty	min	max	whitespace	label
feedCAM_stopdrawingText	character	0	1	6	85	0	92	0	NA

feedCAM_already

Distribution

Distribution of values for feedCAM_already

0 missing values.

Summary statistics

name	data_type	n_missing	complete_rate	min	median	max	mean	sd	hist	label
feedCAM_already	numeric	0	1	0	0	2	0.1666667	0.5246722	<U+2587><U+2581><U+2581><U+2581><U+2581>	NA

feedCAM_alreadyText

Distribution

Distribution of values for feedCAM_alreadyText

0 missing values.

Summary statistics

name	data_type	n_missing	complete_rate	n_unique	empty	min	max	whitespace	label
feedCAM_alreadyText	character	0	1	7	84	0	67	0	NA

feedback_critic

Distribution

Distribution of values for feedback_critic

2 missing values.

Summary statistics

name	data_type	n_missing	complete_rate	n_unique	empty	min	max	whitespace	label
feedback_critic	character	2	0.9777778	60	28	0	581	0	NA

paradefocus

Distribution

Distribution of values for paradefocus

44 missing values.

Summary statistics

name	data_type	n_missing	complete_rate	min	median	max	mean	sd	hist	label
paradefocus	numeric	44	0.5111111	1	2	89	8.956522	17.11784	<U+2587><U+2581><U+2581><U+2581><U+2581>	NA

durationtotal

Distribution

Distribution of values for durationtotal

8 missing values.

Summary statistics

name	data_type	n_missing	complete_rate	min	median	max	mean	sd	hist	label
durationtotal	numeric	8	0.9111111	23	57	198	61.62476	27.40293	<U+2587><U+2586><U+2582><U+2581><U+2581>	NA

sociodemo_studentdummy

Distribution

Distribution of values for sociodemo_studentdummy

0 missing values.

Summary statistics

name	data_type	n_missing	complete_rate	n_unique	empty	min	max	whitespace	label
sociodemo_studentdummy	character	0	1	3	1	0	3	0	NA

sociodemo_employment

Distribution

Distribution of values for sociodemo_employment

0 missing values.

Summary statistics

name	data_type	n_missing	complete_rate	n_unique	empty	min	max	whitespace	label
sociodemo_employment	character	0	1	6	0	5	56	0	NA

duration_06scenariotext

Distribution

Distribution of values for duration_06scenariotext

0 missing values.

Summary statistics

name	data_type	n_missing	complete_rate	min	median	max	mean	sd	hist	label
duration_06scenariotext	numeric	0	1	62	123	498	150.1851	87.55816	<U+2587><U+2582><U+2581><U+2581><U+2581>	NA

duration_10caminstruct1

Distribution

Distribution of values for duration_10caminstruct1

0 missing values.

Summary statistics

name	data_type	n_missing	complete_rate	min	median	max	mean	sd	hist	label
duration_10caminstruct1	numeric	0	1	47	302	2444	354.8176	287.801	<U+2587><U+2581><U+2581><U+2581><U+2581>	NA

duration_07quesTechnologicalImplant

Distribution

Distribution of values for duration_07quesTechnologicalImplant

0 missing values.

Summary statistics

name	data_type	n_missing	complete_rate	min	median	max	mean	sd	hist	label
duration_07quesTechnologicalImplant	numeric	0	1	14	32	153	39.93311	27.92708	<U+2587><U+2582><U+2581><U+2581><U+2581>	NA

countclicks_07quesTechnologicalImplant

Distribution

Distribution of values for countclicks_07quesTechnologicalImplant

0 missing values.

Summary statistics

name	data_type	n_missing	complete_rate	min	median	max	mean	sd	hist	label
countclicks_07quesTechnologicalImplant	numeric	0	1	0	0	9	0.7444444	1.353822	<U+2587><U+2582><U+2581><U+2581><U+2581>	NA

duration_ethicscale_01

Distribution

Distribution of values for duration_ethicscale_01

0 missing values.

Summary statistics

name	data_type	n_missing	complete_rate	min	median	max	mean	sd	hist	label
duration_ethicscale_01	numeric	0	1	8.8	50	234	62.35967	38.36097	<U+2587><U+2586><U+2581><U+2581><U+2581>	NA

countclicks_ethicscale_01

Distribution

Distribution of values for countclicks_ethicscale_01

0 missing values.

Summary statistics

name	data_type	n_missing	complete_rate	min	median	max	mean	sd	hist	label
countclicks_ethicscale_01	numeric	0	1	0	0.5	7	1.155556	1.578729	<U+2587><U+2582><U+2582><U+2581><U+2581>	NA

duration_ethicscale_02

Distribution

Distribution of values for duration_ethicscale_02

0 missing values.

Summary statistics

name	data_type	n_missing	complete_rate	min	median	max	mean	sd	hist	label
duration_ethicscale_02	numeric	0	1	9.3	45	648	63.20378	82.72533	<U+2587><U+2581><U+2581><U+2581><U+2581>	NA

countclicks_ethicscale_02

Distribution

Distribution of values for countclicks_ethicscale_02

0 missing values.

Summary statistics

name	data_type	n_missing	complete_rate	min	median	max	mean	sd	hist	label
countclicks_ethicscale_02	numeric	0	1	0	1	10	1.411111	1.907374	<U+2587><U+2581><U+2581><U+2581><U+2581>	NA

duration_ethicscale_03

Distribution

Distribution of values for duration_ethicscale_03

0 missing values.

Summary statistics

name	data_type	n_missing	complete_rate	min	median	max	mean	sd	hist	label
duration_ethicscale_03	numeric	0	1	8.6	42	164	50.91811	28.73207	<U+2587><U+2586><U+2582><U+2581><U+2581>	NA

countclicks_ethicscale_03

Distribution

Distribution of values for countclicks_ethicscale_03

0 missing values.

Summary statistics

name	data_type	n_missing	complete_rate	min	median	max	mean	sd	hist	label
countclicks_ethicscale_03	numeric	0	1	0	1	7	1.455556	1.67037	<U+2587><U+2582><U+2582><U+2581><U+2581>	NA

duration_ethicscale_04

Distribution

Distribution of values for duration_ethicscale_04

0 missing values.

Summary statistics

name	data_type	n_missing	complete_rate	min	median	max	mean	sd	hist	label
duration_ethicscale_04	numeric	0	1	7.9	42	155	48.98378	28.92376	<U+2587><U+2587><U+2582><U+2581><U+2581>	NA

countclicks_ethicscale_04

Distribution

Distribution of values for countclicks_ethicscale_04

0 missing values.

Summary statistics

name	data_type	n_missing	complete_rate	min	median	max	mean	sd	hist	label
countclicks_ethicscale_04	numeric	0	1	0	1	9	1.4	1.674662	<U+2587><U+2582><U+2581><U+2581><U+2581>	NA

duration_ethicscale_05

Distribution

Distribution of values for duration_ethicscale_05

0 missing values.

Summary statistics

name	data_type	n_missing	complete_rate	min	median	max	mean	sd	hist	label
duration_ethicscale_05	numeric	0	1	7.3	33	147	39.12539	23.27125	<U+2587><U+2585><U+2581><U+2581><U+2581>	NA

countclicks_ethicscale_05

Distribution

Distribution of values for countclicks_ethicscale_05

0 missing values.

Summary statistics

name	data_type	n_missing	complete_rate	min	median	max	mean	sd	hist	label
countclicks_ethicscale_05	numeric	0	1	0	1	8	1.144444	1.597478	<U+2587><U+2582><U+2581><U+2581><U+2581>	NA

duration_XXquesTAM_rel02

Distribution

Distribution of values for duration_XXquesTAM_rel02

0 missing values.

Summary statistics

name	data_type	n_missing	complete_rate	min	median	max	mean	sd	hist	label
duration_XXquesTAM_rel02	numeric	0	1	2.5	16	149	24.23094	25.1229	<U+2587><U+2581><U+2581><U+2581><U+2581>	NA

countclicks_XXquesTAM_rel02

Distribution

Distribution of values for countclicks_XXquesTAM_rel02

0 missing values.

Summary statistics

name	data_type	n_missing	complete_rate	min	median	max	mean	sd	hist	label
countclicks_XXquesTAM_rel02	numeric	0	1	0	0	5	0.4111111	0.8855195	<U+2587><U+2581><U+2581><U+2581><U+2581>	NA

duration_XXquesTAM_vol10

Distribution

Distribution of values for duration_XXquesTAM_vol10

0 missing values.

Summary statistics

name	data_type	n_missing	complete_rate	min	median	max	mean	sd	hist	label
duration_XXquesTAM_vol10	numeric	0	1	2.7	21	154	27.29189	20.91655	<U+2587><U+2582><U+2581><U+2581><U+2581>	NA

countclicks_XXquesTAM_vol10

Distribution

Distribution of values for countclicks_XXquesTAM_vol10

0 missing values.

Summary statistics

name	data_type	n_missing	complete_rate	min	median	max	mean	sd	hist	label
countclicks_XXquesTAM_vol10	numeric	0	1	0	0	4	0.3888889	0.8030062	<U+2587><U+2582><U+2581><U+2581><U+2581>	NA

duration_XXquesTAM_img03

Distribution

Distribution of values for duration_XXquesTAM_img03

0 missing values.

Summary statistics

name	data_type	n_missing	complete_rate	min	median	max	mean	sd	hist	label
duration_XXquesTAM_img03	numeric	0	1	3.2	17	140	23.37356	21.67672	<U+2587><U+2581><U+2581><U+2581><U+2581>	NA

countclicks_XXquesTAM_img03

Distribution

Distribution of values for countclicks_XXquesTAM_img03

0 missing values.

Summary statistics

name	data_type	n_missing	complete_rate	min	median	max	mean	sd	hist	label
countclicks_XXquesTAM_img03	numeric	0	1	0	0	7	0.5	1.220149	<U+2587><U+2581><U+2581><U+2581><U+2581>	NA

duration_XXquesTAM_enj09

Distribution

Distribution of values for duration_XXquesTAM_enj09

0 missing values.

Summary statistics

name	data_type	n_missing	complete_rate	min	median	max	mean	sd	hist	label
duration_XXquesTAM_enj09	numeric	0	1	2.4	13	117	17.54856	17.16578	<U+2587><U+2581><U+2581><U+2581><U+2581>	NA

countclicks_XXquesTAM_enj09

Distribution

Distribution of values for countclicks_XXquesTAM_enj09

0 missing values.

Summary statistics

name	data_type	n_missing	complete_rate	min	median	max	mean	sd	hist	label
countclicks_XXquesTAM_enj09	numeric	0	1	0	0	5	0.3666667	0.9050421	<U+2587><U+2581><U+2581><U+2581><U+2581>	NA

duration_XXquesTAM_canx08

Distribution

Distribution of values for duration_XXquesTAM_canx08

0 missing values.

Summary statistics

name	data_type	n_missing	complete_rate	min	median	max	mean	sd	hist	label
duration_XXquesTAM_canx08	numeric	0	1	4	16	221	22.7185	26.01469	<U+2587><U+2581><U+2581><U+2581><U+2581>	NA

countclicks_XXquesTAM_canx08

Distribution

Distribution of values for countclicks_XXquesTAM_canx08

0 missing values.

Summary statistics

name	data_type	n_missing	complete_rate	min	median	max	mean	sd	hist	label
countclicks_XXquesTAM_canx08	numeric	0	1	0	0	7	0.7111111	1.274155	<U+2587><U+2581><U+2581><U+2581><U+2581>	NA

duration_XXquesTAM_pec07

Distribution

Distribution of values for duration_XXquesTAM_pec07

0 missing values.

Summary statistics

name	data_type	n_missing	complete_rate	min	median	max	mean	sd	hist	label
duration_XXquesTAM_pec07	numeric	0	1	2.6	24	366	31.96933	39.48167	<U+2587><U+2581><U+2581><U+2581><U+2581>	NA

countclicks_XXquesTAM_pec07

Distribution

Distribution of values for countclicks_XXquesTAM_pec07

0 missing values.

Summary statistics

name	data_type	n_missing	complete_rate	min	median	max	mean	sd	hist	label
countclicks_XXquesTAM_pec07	numeric	0	1	0	0	7	0.6	1.149499	<U+2587><U+2581><U+2581><U+2581><U+2581>	NA

duration_XXquesTAM_bi04

Distribution

Distribution of values for duration_XXquesTAM_bi04

0 missing values.

Summary statistics

name	data_type	n_missing	complete_rate	min	median	max	mean	sd	hist	label
duration_XXquesTAM_bi04	numeric	0	1	5.1	26	577	35.34539	59.81958	<U+2587><U+2581><U+2581><U+2581><U+2581>	NA

countclicks_XXquesTAM_bi04

Distribution

Distribution of values for countclicks_XXquesTAM_bi04

0 missing values.

Summary statistics

name	data_type	n_missing	complete_rate	min	median	max	mean	sd	hist	label
countclicks_XXquesTAM_bi04	numeric	0	1	0	0.5	6	0.8777778	1.139956	<U+2587><U+2582><U+2581><U+2581><U+2581>	NA

duration_XXquesTAM_pu05

Distribution

Distribution of values for duration_XXquesTAM_pu05

0 missing values.

Summary statistics

name	data_type	n_missing	complete_rate	min	median	max	mean	sd	hist	label
duration_XXquesTAM_pu05	numeric	0	1	3.6	18	67	19.95939	11.81635	<U+2587><U+2587><U+2581><U+2581><U+2581>	NA

countclicks_XXquesTAM_pu05

Distribution

Distribution of values for countclicks_XXquesTAM_pu05

0 missing values.

Summary statistics

name	data_type	n_missing	complete_rate	min	median	max	mean	sd	hist	label
countclicks_XXquesTAM_pu05	numeric	0	1	0	0	4	0.4666667	0.8637519	<U+2587><U+2582><U+2581><U+2581><U+2581>	NA

duration_XXquesTAM_res01

Distribution

Distribution of values for duration_XXquesTAM_res01

0 missing values.

Summary statistics

name	data_type	n_missing	complete_rate	min	median	max	mean	sd	hist	label
duration_XXquesTAM_res01	numeric	0	1	3.4	23	265	30.81072	30.32102	<U+2587><U+2581><U+2581><U+2581><U+2581>	NA

countclicks_XXquesTAM_res01

Distribution

Distribution of values for countclicks_XXquesTAM_res01

0 missing values.

Summary statistics

name	data_type	n_missing	complete_rate	min	median	max	mean	sd	hist	label
countclicks_XXquesTAM_res01	numeric	0	1	0	0	8	0.7	1.352899	<U+2587><U+2581><U+2581><U+2581><U+2581>	NA

duration_XXquesTAM_sn06

Distribution

Distribution of values for duration_XXquesTAM_sn06

0 missing values.

Summary statistics

name	data_type	n_missing	complete_rate	min	median	max	mean	sd	hist	label
duration_XXquesTAM_sn06	numeric	0	1	4.5	23	158	31.724	22.60284	<U+2587><U+2583><U+2581><U+2581><U+2581>	NA

countclicks_XXquesTAM_sn06

Distribution

Distribution of values for countclicks_XXquesTAM_sn06

0 missing values.

Summary statistics

name	data_type	n_missing	complete_rate	min	median	max	mean	sd	hist	label
countclicks_XXquesTAM_sn06	numeric	0	1	0	0	6	0.7222222	1.161438	<U+2587><U+2581><U+2581><U+2581><U+2581>	NA

duration_quesPANAS01

Distribution

Distribution of values for duration_quesPANAS01

0 missing values.

Summary statistics

name	data_type	n_missing	complete_rate	min	median	max	mean	sd	hist	label
duration_quesPANAS01	numeric	0	1	13	31	195	39.0155	29.65596	<U+2587><U+2581><U+2581><U+2581><U+2581>	NA

duration_quesPANAS02

Distribution

Distribution of values for duration_quesPANAS02

0 missing values.

Summary statistics

name	data_type	n_missing	complete_rate	min	median	max	mean	sd	hist	label
duration_quesPANAS02	numeric	0	1	9.4	24	99	27.77422	14.11098	<U+2587><U+2583><U+2581><U+2581><U+2581>	NA

duration_XXquesConflictMan01

Distribution

Distribution of values for duration_XXquesConflictMan01

0 missing values.

Summary statistics

name	data_type	n_missing	complete_rate	min	median	max	mean	sd	hist	label
duration_XXquesConflictMan01	numeric	0	1	12	68	1071	87.47111	111.4682	<U+2587><U+2581><U+2581><U+2581><U+2581>	NA

countclicks_XXquesConflictMan01

Distribution

Distribution of values for countclicks_XXquesConflictMan01

0 missing values.

Summary statistics

name	data_type	n_missing	complete_rate	min	median	max	mean	sd	hist	label
countclicks_XXquesConflictMan01	numeric	0	1	0	1	8	1.555556	1.932054	<U+2587><U+2583><U+2581><U+2581><U+2581>	NA

duration_XXquesConflictMan02

Distribution

Distribution of values for duration_XXquesConflictMan02

0 missing values.

Summary statistics

name	data_type	n_missing	complete_rate	min	median	max	mean	sd	hist	label
duration_XXquesConflictMan02	numeric	0	1	11	46	317	57.79606	42.87752	<U+2587><U+2582><U+2581><U+2581><U+2581>	NA

countclicks_XXquesConflictMan02

Distribution

Distribution of values for countclicks_XXquesConflictMan02

0 missing values.

Summary statistics

name	data_type	n_missing	complete_rate	min	median	max	mean	sd	hist	label
countclicks_XXquesConflictMan02	numeric	0	1	0	1	9	1.1	1.558233	<U+2587><U+2582><U+2581><U+2581><U+2581>	NA

Scale: relativist

Overview

Reliability: .

Missing: 0.

Likert plot of scale relativist items

Distribution of scale relativist

Reliability details

## No viewer found, probably documenting or testing

---

Scale diagnosis

Reliability (internal consistency) estimates

Scale structure

Information about this scale

Dataframe:	res$dat
Items:	relativist01, relativist02, relativist03, relativist04 & relativist05
Observations:	90
Positive correlations:	10
Number of correlations:	10
Percentage positive correlations:	100

Estimates assuming interval level

Omega (total):	0.90
Omega (hierarchical):	0.78
Revelle’s Omega (total):	0.90
Greatest Lower Bound (GLB):	0.89
Coefficient H:	0.85
Coefficient Alpha:	0.84

(Estimates assuming ordinal level not computed, as the polychoric correlation matrix has missing values.)

Note: the normal point estimate and confidence interval for omega are based on the procedure suggested by Dunn, Baguley & Brunsden (2013) using the MBESS function ci.reliability, whereas the psych package point estimate was suggested in Revelle & Zinbarg (2008). See the help (‘?ufs::scaleStructure’) for more information.

Eigen values

3.086, 0.808, 0.454, 0.383 & 0.269

Factor analysis (reproducing only shared variance)

	ML1
relativist01	0.750
relativist02	0.769
relativist03	0.683
relativist04	0.699
relativist05	0.711

Component analysis (reproducing full covariance matrix)

	PC1
relativist01	0.812
relativist02	0.817
relativist03	0.755
relativist04	0.765
relativist05	0.778

Item descriptives

	mean	median	var	sd	IQR	se	min	q1	q3	max	skew	kurt	dip	n	NA	valid
relativist01	3.5778	4	2.6287	1.6213	3	0.1709	1	2	5	7	0.2295	-0.6884	0.1	90	0	90
relativist02	3.6667	4	2.9663	1.7223	3	0.1815	1	2	5	7	-0.0195	-0.8726	0.0833	90	0	90
relativist03	2.7444	3	1.9452	1.3947	2	0.147	1	2	4	7	0.6236	0.0133	0.1167	90	0	90
relativist04	4.5556	5	2.6542	1.6292	3	0.1717	1	3	6	7	-0.3644	-0.6218	0.1056	90	0	90
relativist05	3.8556	4	2.0351	1.4266	2	0.1504	1	2	5	7	-0.0722	-0.4403	0.0889	90	0	90

Scattermatrix

Scatterplot

---

## No viewer found, probably documenting or testing

Summary statistics

name	data_type	n_missing	complete_rate	min	median	max	mean	sd	hist	label
relativist01	numeric	0	1	1	4	7	3.577778	1.621331	<U+2587><U+2585><U+2586><U+2583><U+2583>	NA
relativist02	numeric	0	1	1	4	7	3.666667	1.722293	<U+2587><U+2585><U+2587><U+2585><U+2585>	NA
relativist03	numeric	0	1	1	3	7	2.744444	1.394702	<U+2587><U+2585><U+2582><U+2582><U+2581>	NA
relativist04	numeric	0	1	1	5	7	4.555556	1.629166	<U+2583><U+2583><U+2585><U+2585><U+2587>	NA
relativist05	numeric	0	1	1	4	7	3.855556	1.426563	<U+2585><U+2585><U+2587><U+2585><U+2583>	NA

Scale: contractualist

Overview

Reliability: .

Missing: 0.

Likert plot of scale contractualist items

Distribution of scale contractualist

Reliability details

## No viewer found, probably documenting or testing

---

Scale diagnosis

Reliability (internal consistency) estimates

Scale structure

Information about this scale

Dataframe:	res$dat
Items:	contractualist01, contractualist02, contractualist03, contractualist04, contractualist05, contractualist06 & contractualist07
Observations:	90
Positive correlations:	21
Number of correlations:	21
Percentage positive correlations:	100

Estimates assuming interval level

Omega (total):	0.93
Omega (hierarchical):	0.83
Revelle’s Omega (total):	0.93
Greatest Lower Bound (GLB):	0.93
Coefficient H:	0.91
Coefficient Alpha:	0.88

(Estimates assuming ordinal level not computed, as the polychoric correlation matrix has missing values.)

Note: the normal point estimate and confidence interval for omega are based on the procedure suggested by Dunn, Baguley & Brunsden (2013) using the MBESS function ci.reliability, whereas the psych package point estimate was suggested in Revelle & Zinbarg (2008). See the help (‘?ufs::scaleStructure’) for more information.

Eigen values

4.144, 0.958, 0.671, 0.466, 0.306, 0.243 & 0.212

Factor analysis (reproducing only shared variance)

	ML1
contractualist01	0.860
contractualist02	0.833
contractualist03	0.698
contractualist04	0.615
contractualist05	0.609
contractualist06	0.855
contractualist07	0.561

Component analysis (reproducing full covariance matrix)

	PC1
contractualist01	0.859
contractualist02	0.846
contractualist03	0.783
contractualist04	0.701
contractualist05	0.653
contractualist06	0.864
contractualist07	0.641

Item descriptives

	mean	median	var	sd	IQR	se	min	q1	q3	max	skew	kurt	dip	n	NA	valid
contractualist01	4.0333	4	1.7629	1.3278	2	0.14	1	3	5	7	-0.2096	-0.019	0.1056	90	0	90
contractualist02	3.9667	4	1.9652	1.4018	2	0.1478	1	2	6	7	-0.0397	-0.4752	0.0722	90	0	90
contractualist03	3.7333	4	2.8944	1.7013	2	0.1793	1	2.5	6	7	0.2189	-0.691	0.1167	90	0	90
contractualist04	4.0556	4	2.8171	1.6784	2	0.1769	1	3	6	7	0.1147	-0.7474	0.1056	90	0	90
contractualist05	3.8556	4	2.507	1.5833	2	0.1669	1	2	6	7	0.0694	-0.4056	0.0778	90	0	90
contractualist06	3.9556	4	2.6946	1.6415	2	0.173	1	3	6	7	0.0727	-0.796	0.1	90	0	90
contractualist07	3.6667	4	1.4382	1.1993	1	0.1264	1	2	5	7	-0.0044	0.7469	0.0833	90	0	90

Scattermatrix

Scatterplot

---

## No viewer found, probably documenting or testing

Summary statistics

name	data_type	n_missing	complete_rate	min	median	max	mean	sd	hist	label
contractualist01	numeric	0	1	1	4	7	4.033333	1.327751	<U+2583><U+2583><U+2587><U+2585><U+2583>	NA
contractualist02	numeric	0	1	1	4	7	3.966667	1.401845	<U+2583><U+2583><U+2587><U+2583><U+2583>	NA
contractualist03	numeric	0	1	1	4	7	3.733333	1.701288	<U+2587><U+2587><U+2587><U+2582><U+2586>	NA
contractualist04	numeric	0	1	1	4	7	4.055556	1.678423	<U+2586><U+2587><U+2587><U+2585><U+2587>	NA
contractualist05	numeric	0	1	1	4	7	3.855556	1.583348	<U+2585><U+2583><U+2587><U+2582><U+2583>	NA
contractualist06	numeric	0	1	1	4	7	3.955556	1.641533	<U+2587><U+2587><U+2587><U+2586><U+2587>	NA
contractualist07	numeric	0	1	1	4	7	3.666667	1.199251	<U+2583><U+2582><U+2587><U+2582><U+2581>	NA

Scale: hedonism

Overview

Reliability: .

Missing: 0.

Likert plot of scale hedonism items

Distribution of scale hedonism

Reliability details

## No viewer found, probably documenting or testing

---

Scale diagnosis

Reliability (internal consistency) estimates

Scale structure

Information about this scale

Dataframe:	res$dat
Items:	hedonism01, hedonism02, hedonism03, hedonism04, hedonism05, hedonism06, hedonism07, hedonism08, hedonism09 & hedonism10
Observations:	90
Positive correlations:	45
Number of correlations:	45
Percentage positive correlations:	100

Estimates assuming interval level

Omega (total):	0.91
Omega (hierarchical):	0.75
Revelle’s Omega (total):	0.91
Greatest Lower Bound (GLB):	0.93
Coefficient H:	0.94
Coefficient Alpha:	0.88

(Estimates assuming ordinal level not computed, as the polychoric correlation matrix has missing values.)

Note: the normal point estimate and confidence interval for omega are based on the procedure suggested by Dunn, Baguley & Brunsden (2013) using the MBESS function ci.reliability, whereas the psych package point estimate was suggested in Revelle & Zinbarg (2008). See the help (‘?ufs::scaleStructure’) for more information.

Eigen values

5.124, 1.184, 0.936, 0.725, 0.603, 0.467, 0.379, 0.258, 0.183 & 0.141

Factor analysis (reproducing only shared variance)

	ML1	ML2
hedonism01	0.150	0.718
hedonism02	-0.191	0.633
hedonism03	0.323	0.124
hedonism04	0.672	0.002
hedonism05	0.591	0.401
hedonism06	0.277	0.324
hedonism07	0.673	0.255
hedonism08	0.987	-0.112
hedonism09	0.450	0.337
hedonism10	0.909	-0.015

Component analysis (reproducing full covariance matrix)

	TC1	TC2
hedonism01	0.449	0.579
hedonism02	-0.081	0.889
hedonism03	0.542	-0.132
hedonism04	0.789	-0.168
hedonism05	0.786	0.239
hedonism06	0.432	0.302
hedonism07	0.801	0.158
hedonism08	0.934	-0.148
hedonism09	0.638	0.236
hedonism10	0.910	-0.072

Item descriptives

	mean	median	var	sd	IQR	se	min	q1	q3	max	skew	kurt	dip	n	NA	valid
hedonism01	4.4444	5	2.789	1.67	3	0.176	1	3	6	7	-0.5597	-0.4528	0.1111	90	0	90
hedonism02	4.6778	5	2.5355	1.5923	2	0.1678	1	4	6	7	-0.7852	0.1755	0.1278	90	0	90
hedonism03	2.1556	2	2.0429	1.4293	2	0.1507	1	1	4	7	1.4671	1.9348	0.1389	90	0	90
hedonism04	3.6778	4	2.6703	1.6341	2	0.1722	1	3	5	7	0.0467	-0.7762	0.1	90	0	90
hedonism05	3.7778	4	2.6242	1.6199	2	0.1708	1	2	5	7	-0.1495	-0.801	0.0944	90	0	90
hedonism06	4.7222	5	1.5961	1.2634	2	0.1332	1	4	6	7	-0.1749	0.1261	0.1389	90	0	90
hedonism07	4.7889	5	2.2134	1.4877	2	0.1568	1	4	6	7	-0.633	0.2402	0.1222	90	0	90
hedonism08	4.4333	5	2.7202	1.6493	3	0.1739	1	3	6	7	-0.3715	-0.6763	0.1056	90	0	90
hedonism09	3.6333	4	2.9315	1.7122	3	0.1805	1	2	5	7	0.1933	-0.7474	0.0889	90	0	90
hedonism10	4.0444	4	2.9418	1.7152	2	0.1808	1	2	6	7	-0.0021	-0.9607	0.0833	90	0	90

Scattermatrix

Scatterplot

---

## No viewer found, probably documenting or testing

Summary statistics

name	data_type	n_missing	complete_rate	min	median	max	mean	sd	hist	label
hedonism01	numeric	0	1	1	5	7	4.444444	1.670034	<U+2583><U+2583><U+2585><U+2585><U+2587>	NA
hedonism02	numeric	0	1	1	5	7	4.677778	1.592311	<U+2582><U+2582><U+2585><U+2586><U+2587>	NA
hedonism03	numeric	0	1	1	2	7	2.155556	1.429317	<U+2587><U+2582><U+2581><U+2581><U+2581>	NA
hedonism04	numeric	0	1	1	4	7	3.677778	1.634101	<U+2587><U+2587><U+2586><U+2586><U+2585>	NA
hedonism05	numeric	0	1	1	4	7	3.777778	1.619944	<U+2587><U+2586><U+2587><U+2586><U+2586>	NA
hedonism06	numeric	0	1	1	5	7	4.722222	1.263380	<U+2581><U+2582><U+2587><U+2587><U+2586>	NA
hedonism07	numeric	0	1	1	5	7	4.788889	1.487736	<U+2582><U+2582><U+2586><U+2585><U+2587>	NA
hedonism08	numeric	0	1	1	5	7	4.433333	1.649310	<U+2583><U+2583><U+2585><U+2586><U+2587>	NA
hedonism09	numeric	0	1	1	4	7	3.633333	1.712151	<U+2587><U+2585><U+2586><U+2585><U+2583>	NA
hedonism10	numeric	0	1	1	4	7	4.044444	1.715174	<U+2587><U+2586><U+2587><U+2585><U+2587>	NA

Scale: utilitarian

Overview

Reliability: .

Missing: 0.

Likert plot of scale utilitarian items

Distribution of scale utilitarian

Reliability details

## No viewer found, probably documenting or testing

---

Scale diagnosis

Reliability (internal consistency) estimates

Scale structure

Information about this scale

Dataframe:	res$dat
Items:	utilitarian01, utilitarian02, utilitarian03, utilitarian04, utilitarian05, utilitarian06, utilitarian07, utilitarian08 & utilitarian09
Observations:	90
Positive correlations:	36
Number of correlations:	36
Percentage positive correlations:	100

Estimates assuming interval level

Omega (total):	0.95
Omega (hierarchical):	0.80
Revelle’s Omega (total):	0.95
Greatest Lower Bound (GLB):	0.95
Coefficient H:	0.94
Coefficient Alpha:	0.93

(Estimates assuming ordinal level not computed, as the polychoric correlation matrix has missing values.)

Note: the normal point estimate and confidence interval for omega are based on the procedure suggested by Dunn, Baguley & Brunsden (2013) using the MBESS function ci.reliability, whereas the psych package point estimate was suggested in Revelle & Zinbarg (2008). See the help (‘?ufs::scaleStructure’) for more information.

Eigen values

5.708, 0.835, 0.594, 0.435, 0.413, 0.331, 0.268, 0.234 & 0.182

Factor analysis (reproducing only shared variance)

	ML1
utilitarian01	0.533
utilitarian02	0.848
utilitarian03	0.879
utilitarian04	0.665
utilitarian05	0.838
utilitarian06	0.840
utilitarian07	0.748
utilitarian08	0.723
utilitarian09	0.786

Component analysis (reproducing full covariance matrix)

	PC1
utilitarian01	0.601
utilitarian02	0.866
utilitarian03	0.881
utilitarian04	0.708
utilitarian05	0.850
utilitarian06	0.845
utilitarian07	0.789
utilitarian08	0.773
utilitarian09	0.815

Item descriptives

	mean	median	var	sd	IQR	se	min	q1	q3	max	skew	kurt	dip	n	NA	valid
utilitarian01	5.0222	5	1.4152	1.1896	2	0.1254	1	4	6	7	-0.6989	0.8733	0.1444	90	0	90
utilitarian02	4.6333	5	1.8528	1.3612	2	0.1435	1	4	6	7	-0.5612	0.1093	0.1278	90	0	90
utilitarian03	4.2778	4	2.54	1.5937	2	0.168	1	2	5	7	-0.2649	-0.571	0.1056	90	0	90
utilitarian04	4.4222	5	2.1793	1.4762	2	0.1556	1	4	6	7	-0.616	-0.2112	0.1278	90	0	90
utilitarian05	4.1889	4	1.8853	1.3731	1	0.1447	1	2.5	5	7	-0.3493	0.232	0.0944	90	0	90
utilitarian06	4.3444	4	1.5991	1.2646	1	0.1333	1	2.5	5	7	-0.4759	0.6085	0.15	90	0	90
utilitarian07	4.2333	4	1.9112	1.3825	1	0.1457	1	2	5	7	-0.2488	-0.3643	0.1167	90	0	90
utilitarian08	5.1	5	2.1584	1.4692	2	0.1549	1	4	6	7	-0.8506	0.8573	0.1222	90	0	90
utilitarian09	4.2667	4	2.6022	1.6131	3	0.17	1	2	6	7	-0.3476	-0.615	0.1056	90	0	90

Scattermatrix

Scatterplot

---

## No viewer found, probably documenting or testing

Summary statistics

name	data_type	n_missing	complete_rate	min	median	max	mean	sd	hist	label
utilitarian01	numeric	0	1	1	5	7	5.022222	1.189635	<U+2581><U+2581><U+2585><U+2587><U+2587>	NA
utilitarian02	numeric	0	1	1	5	7	4.633333	1.361179	<U+2582><U+2582><U+2587><U+2587><U+2587>	NA
utilitarian03	numeric	0	1	1	4	7	4.277778	1.593722	<U+2585><U+2585><U+2586><U+2587><U+2587>	NA
utilitarian04	numeric	0	1	1	5	7	4.422222	1.476237	<U+2585><U+2582><U+2587><U+2587><U+2587>	NA
utilitarian05	numeric	0	1	1	4	7	4.188889	1.373051	<U+2582><U+2582><U+2587><U+2583><U+2583>	NA
utilitarian06	numeric	0	1	1	4	7	4.344444	1.264566	<U+2582><U+2582><U+2587><U+2586><U+2583>	NA
utilitarian07	numeric	0	1	1	4	7	4.233333	1.382475	<U+2583><U+2582><U+2587><U+2586><U+2585>	NA
utilitarian08	numeric	0	1	1	5	7	5.100000	1.469159	<U+2581><U+2581><U+2585><U+2585><U+2587>	NA
utilitarian09	numeric	0	1	1	4	7	4.266667	1.613148	<U+2585><U+2583><U+2587><U+2586><U+2587>	NA

Scale: deontology

Overview

Reliability: .

Missing: 0.

Likert plot of scale deontology items

Distribution of scale deontology

Reliability details

## No viewer found, probably documenting or testing

---

Scale diagnosis

Reliability (internal consistency) estimates

Scale structure

Information about this scale

Dataframe:	res$dat
Items:	deontology01, deontology02, deontology03, deontology04, deontology05, deontology06, deontology07 & deontology08
Observations:	90
Positive correlations:	28
Number of correlations:	28
Percentage positive correlations:	100

Estimates assuming interval level

Omega (total):	0.92
Omega (hierarchical):	0.62
Revelle’s Omega (total):	0.92
Greatest Lower Bound (GLB):	0.93
Coefficient H:	0.90
Coefficient Alpha:	0.86

(Estimates assuming ordinal level not computed, as the polychoric correlation matrix has missing values.)

Note: the normal point estimate and confidence interval for omega are based on the procedure suggested by Dunn, Baguley & Brunsden (2013) using the MBESS function ci.reliability, whereas the psych package point estimate was suggested in Revelle & Zinbarg (2008). See the help (‘?ufs::scaleStructure’) for more information.

Eigen values

4.222, 1.219, 0.608, 0.507, 0.47, 0.406, 0.354 & 0.213

Factor analysis (reproducing only shared variance)

	ML1	ML2
deontology01	-0.044	0.867
deontology02	0.345	0.545
deontology03	0.838	0.031
deontology04	0.742	-0.192
deontology05	0.693	-0.027
deontology06	0.587	0.241
deontology07	0.812	0.004
deontology08	0.709	0.072

Component analysis (reproducing full covariance matrix)

	TC1	TC2
deontology01	-0.088	0.937
deontology02	0.299	0.706
deontology03	0.824	0.090
deontology04	0.837	-0.248
deontology05	0.779	-0.033
deontology06	0.587	0.359
deontology07	0.822	0.038
deontology08	0.745	0.114

Item descriptives

	mean	median	var	sd	IQR	se	min	q1	q3	max	skew	kurt	dip	n	NA	valid
deontology01	3.9222	4	1.7804	1.3343	1	0.1406	1	2	5.5	7	-0.087	0.3682	0.0667	90	0	90
deontology02	3.8111	4	1.3235	1.1504	1	0.1213	1	3	5	7	-0.2539	1.4955	0.0833	90	0	90
deontology03	3.4889	4	2.2527	1.5009	2	0.1582	1	2	5	7	0.1952	-0.3823	0.0944	90	0	90
deontology04	3.7889	4	2.9999	1.732	3	0.1826	1	2	6	7	0.2144	-0.917	0.1	90	0	90
deontology05	4.0111	4	1.5392	1.2406	2	0.1308	1	3	6	7	-0.0576	0.4543	0.0722	90	0	90
deontology06	4.0444	4	1.5486	1.2444	2	0.1312	1	3	5	7	0.0573	0.2176	0.1056	90	0	90
deontology07	2.9333	3	2.3101	1.5199	2	0.1602	1	1	4	7	0.4292	-0.5734	0.1111	90	0	90
deontology08	3.8	4	1.6449	1.2826	1	0.1352	1	2	5	7	-0.0732	0.2365	0.0667	90	0	90

Scattermatrix

Scatterplot

---

## No viewer found, probably documenting or testing

Summary statistics

name	data_type	n_missing	complete_rate	min	median	max	mean	sd	hist	label
deontology01	numeric	0	1	1	4	7	3.922222	1.334316	<U+2582><U+2582><U+2587><U+2582><U+2582>	NA
deontology02	numeric	0	1	1	4	7	3.811111	1.150422	<U+2582><U+2582><U+2587><U+2582><U+2581>	NA
deontology03	numeric	0	1	1	4	7	3.488889	1.500894	<U+2587><U+2585><U+2587><U+2583><U+2582>	NA
deontology04	numeric	0	1	1	4	7	3.788889	1.732015	<U+2587><U+2585><U+2586><U+2585><U+2585>	NA
deontology05	numeric	0	1	1	4	7	4.011111	1.240645	<U+2582><U+2582><U+2587><U+2582><U+2582>	NA
deontology06	numeric	0	1	1	4	7	4.044444	1.244413	<U+2582><U+2585><U+2587><U+2585><U+2582>	NA
deontology07	numeric	0	1	1	3	7	2.933333	1.519905	<U+2587><U+2585><U+2583><U+2582><U+2581>	NA
deontology08	numeric	0	1	1	4	7	3.800000	1.282554	<U+2583><U+2582><U+2587><U+2582><U+2582>	NA

Scale: virtue

Overview

Reliability: .

Missing: 0.

Likert plot of scale virtue items

Distribution of scale virtue

Reliability details

## No viewer found, probably documenting or testing

---

Scale diagnosis

Reliability (internal consistency) estimates

Scale structure

Information about this scale

Dataframe:	res$dat
Items:	virtue01, virtue02, virtue03, virtue04, virtue05, virtue06, virtue07, virtue08 & virtue09
Observations:	90
Positive correlations:	36
Number of correlations:	36
Percentage positive correlations:	100

Estimates assuming interval level

Omega (total):	0.94
Omega (hierarchical):	0.78
Revelle’s Omega (total):	0.94
Greatest Lower Bound (GLB):	0.94
Coefficient H:	0.93
Coefficient Alpha:	0.91

(Estimates assuming ordinal level not computed, as the polychoric correlation matrix has missing values.)

Note: the normal point estimate and confidence interval for omega are based on the procedure suggested by Dunn, Baguley & Brunsden (2013) using the MBESS function ci.reliability, whereas the psych package point estimate was suggested in Revelle & Zinbarg (2008). See the help (‘?ufs::scaleStructure’) for more information.

Eigen values

5.247, 1.057, 0.758, 0.551, 0.453, 0.286, 0.253, 0.23 & 0.164

Factor analysis (reproducing only shared variance)

	ML1	ML2
virtue01	0.844	-0.001
virtue02	0.811	0.080
virtue03	-0.023	0.862
virtue04	0.154	0.505
virtue05	0.074	0.878
virtue06	-0.157	0.664
virtue07	0.745	-0.030
virtue08	0.793	-0.037
virtue09	0.436	0.444

Component analysis (reproducing full covariance matrix)

	TC1	TC2
virtue01	0.821	0.048
virtue02	0.846	0.059
virtue03	0.384	0.631
virtue04	0.601	0.120
virtue05	0.537	0.538
virtue06	-0.126	0.924
virtue07	0.826	-0.107
virtue08	0.907	-0.171
virtue09	0.626	0.359

Item descriptives

	mean	median	var	sd	IQR	se	min	q1	q3	max	skew	kurt	dip	n	NA	valid
virtue01	4	4	2.2921	1.514	2	0.1596	1	2	5	7	-0.1788	-0.4683	0.1278	90	0	90
virtue02	4.0222	4	2.4489	1.5649	2	0.165	1	2	6	7	-0.0376	-0.6939	0.0889	90	0	90
virtue03	4.4444	4	1.5755	1.2552	1	0.1323	1	2	6	7	-0.0631	0.6518	0.0944	90	0	90
virtue04	4.2444	4	1.4227	1.1928	1	0.1257	2	3	5	7	0.2426	0.0508	0.1056	90	0	90
virtue05	4.4333	4	1.8663	1.3661	1	0.144	1	2	6	7	-0.4789	0.3638	0.1111	90	0	90
virtue06	5.3222	6	1.8164	1.3477	2	0.1421	1	4	7	7	-0.8087	0.5371	0.1167	90	0	90
virtue07	2.8333	2	3.0618	1.7498	3	0.1844	1	1	4	7	0.7886	-0.3567	0.1111	90	0	90
virtue08	3.7667	4	1.8663	1.3661	2	0.144	1	2	5	7	-0.1874	-0.4754	0.1056	90	0	90
virtue09	4.6222	5	2.1253	1.4579	2	0.1537	1	4	6	7	-0.5147	-0.0478	0.1278	90	0	90

Scattermatrix

Scatterplot

---

## No viewer found, probably documenting or testing

Summary statistics

name	data_type	n_missing	complete_rate	min	median	max	mean	sd	hist	label
virtue01	numeric	0	1	1	4	7	4.000000	1.513980	<U+2586><U+2585><U+2587><U+2587><U+2585>	NA
virtue02	numeric	0	1	1	4	7	4.022222	1.564909	<U+2586><U+2582><U+2587><U+2585><U+2585>	NA
virtue03	numeric	0	1	1	4	7	4.444444	1.255201	<U+2581><U+2581><U+2587><U+2583><U+2583>	NA
virtue04	numeric	0	1	2	4	7	4.244444	1.192779	<U+2585><U+2587><U+2583><U+2582><U+2581>	NA
virtue05	numeric	0	1	1	4	7	4.433333	1.366123	<U+2582><U+2582><U+2587><U+2585><U+2585>	NA
virtue06	numeric	0	1	1	6	7	5.322222	1.347722	<U+2581><U+2581><U+2583><U+2583><U+2587>	NA
virtue07	numeric	0	1	1	2	7	2.833333	1.749799	<U+2587><U+2583><U+2582><U+2581><U+2582>	NA
virtue08	numeric	0	1	1	4	7	3.766667	1.366123	<U+2585><U+2583><U+2587><U+2585><U+2582>	NA
virtue09	numeric	0	1	1	5	7	4.622222	1.457856	<U+2582><U+2582><U+2587><U+2587><U+2587>	NA

Scale: panas_negative

Overview

Reliability: .

Missing: 0.

Likert plot of scale panas_negative items

Distribution of scale panas_negative

Reliability details

## No viewer found, probably documenting or testing

---

Scale diagnosis

Reliability (internal consistency) estimates

Scale structure

Information about this scale

Dataframe:	res$dat
Items:	panas.01n, panas.02n, panas.03n, panas.04n, panas.05n, panas.06n, panas.07n, panas.08n, panas.09n & panas.10n
Observations:	90
Positive correlations:	45
Number of correlations:	45
Percentage positive correlations:	100

Estimates assuming interval level

Omega (total):	0.95
Omega (hierarchical):	0.77
Revelle’s Omega (total):	0.95
Greatest Lower Bound (GLB):	0.95
Coefficient H:	0.95
Coefficient Alpha:	0.92

(Estimates assuming ordinal level not computed, as the polychoric correlation matrix has missing values.)

Note: the normal point estimate and confidence interval for omega are based on the procedure suggested by Dunn, Baguley & Brunsden (2013) using the MBESS function ci.reliability, whereas the psych package point estimate was suggested in Revelle & Zinbarg (2008). See the help (‘?ufs::scaleStructure’) for more information.

Eigen values

5.86, 0.972, 0.881, 0.692, 0.439, 0.351, 0.31, 0.236, 0.161 & 0.098

Factor analysis (reproducing only shared variance)

	ML1
panas.01n	0.856
panas.02n	0.780
panas.03n	0.450
panas.04n	0.921
panas.05n	0.595
panas.06n	0.714
panas.07n	0.601
panas.08n	0.813
panas.09n	0.565
panas.10n	0.879

Component analysis (reproducing full covariance matrix)

	PC1
panas.01n	0.861
panas.02n	0.844
panas.03n	0.520
panas.04n	0.879
panas.05n	0.696
panas.06n	0.813
panas.07n	0.684
panas.08n	0.786
panas.09n	0.640
panas.10n	0.851

Item descriptives

	mean	median	var	sd	IQR	se	min	q1	q3	max	skew	kurt	dip	n	NA	valid
panas.01n	2.2111	2	1.4718	1.2132	2	0.1279	1	1	3	5	0.7027	-0.4649	0.1222	90	0	90
panas.02n	1.9778	2	1.3928	1.1802	2	0.1244	1	1	3	5	1.0505	0.2731	0.1056	90	0	90
panas.03n	1.3778	1	0.5523	0.7432	0	0.0783	1	NA	3	4	1.776	1.8693	0.0611	90	0	90
panas.04n	2.7	2	1.4483	1.2035	2	0.1269	1	1	4	5	0.4842	-0.7729	0.0889	90	0	90
panas.05n	1.9	2	1.1921	1.0918	1	0.1151	1	1	4	5	1.1028	0.3011	0.1444	90	0	90
panas.06n	1.8111	2	0.9414	0.9703	1	0.1023	1	1	3	4	0.9949	-0.0566	0.15	90	0	90
panas.07n	1.3889	1	0.6448	0.803	1	0.0846	1	NA	2	5	2.5023	6.5362	0.0889	90	0	90
panas.08n	3.0667	3	1.4562	1.2067	2	0.1272	1	2	4	5	0.1835	-1.2046	0.1333	90	0	90
panas.09n	2.1556	2	1.1441	1.0696	2	0.1127	1	1	3	5	0.7526	0.0119	0.1611	90	0	90
panas.10n	2.7667	2	1.327	1.1519	2	0.1214	1	1	4	5	0.4271	-0.7749	0.1	90	0	90

Scattermatrix

Scatterplot

---

## No viewer found, probably documenting or testing

Summary statistics

name	data_type	n_missing	complete_rate	min	median	max	mean	sd	hist	label
panas.01n	numeric	0	1	1	2	5	2.211111	1.2131716	<U+2587><U+2585><U+2585><U+2582><U+2581>	NA
panas.02n	numeric	0	1	1	2	5	1.977778	1.1801521	<U+2587><U+2583><U+2583><U+2581><U+2581>	NA
panas.03n	numeric	0	1	1	1	4	1.377778	0.7431754	<U+2587><U+2581><U+2581><U+2581><U+2581>	NA
panas.04n	numeric	0	1	1	2	5	2.700000	1.2034594	<U+2582><U+2587><U+2583><U+2583><U+2582>	NA
panas.05n	numeric	0	1	1	2	5	1.900000	1.0918493	<U+2587><U+2585><U+2582><U+2582><U+2581>	NA
panas.06n	numeric	0	1	1	2	4	1.811111	0.9702825	<U+2587><U+2585><U+2581><U+2582><U+2582>	NA
panas.07n	numeric	0	1	1	1	5	1.388889	0.8030062	<U+2587><U+2582><U+2581><U+2581><U+2581>	NA
panas.08n	numeric	0	1	1	3	5	3.066667	1.2067227	<U+2581><U+2587><U+2583><U+2586><U+2583>	NA
panas.09n	numeric	0	1	1	2	5	2.155556	1.0696120	<U+2587><U+2587><U+2585><U+2582><U+2581>	NA
panas.10n	numeric	0	1	1	2	5	2.766667	1.1519402	<U+2582><U+2587><U+2583><U+2583><U+2582>	NA

Scale: panas_positive

Overview

Reliability: .

Missing: 0.

Likert plot of scale panas_positive items

Distribution of scale panas_positive

Reliability details

## No viewer found, probably documenting or testing

---

Scale diagnosis

Reliability (internal consistency) estimates

Scale structure

Information about this scale

Dataframe:	res$dat
Items:	panas.01p, panas.02p, panas.03p, panas.04p, panas.05p, panas.06p, panas.07p, panas.08p, panas.09p & panas.10p
Observations:	90
Positive correlations:	45
Number of correlations:	45
Percentage positive correlations:	100

Estimates assuming interval level

Omega (total):	0.95
Omega (hierarchical):	0.78
Revelle’s Omega (total):	0.95
Greatest Lower Bound (GLB):	0.96
Coefficient H:	0.93
Coefficient Alpha:	0.92

(Estimates assuming ordinal level not computed, as the polychoric correlation matrix has missing values.)

Note: the normal point estimate and confidence interval for omega are based on the procedure suggested by Dunn, Baguley & Brunsden (2013) using the MBESS function ci.reliability, whereas the psych package point estimate was suggested in Revelle & Zinbarg (2008). See the help (‘?ufs::scaleStructure’) for more information.

Eigen values

5.887, 1.203, 0.694, 0.456, 0.422, 0.357, 0.3, 0.26, 0.241 & 0.18

Factor analysis (reproducing only shared variance)

	ML1	ML2
panas.01p	0.639	0.183
panas.02p	0.849	-0.018
panas.03p	0.404	0.414
panas.04p	0.826	0.083
panas.05p	0.805	-0.053
panas.06p	-0.130	0.819
panas.07p	0.923	-0.106
panas.08p	0.580	0.282
panas.09p	0.157	0.682
panas.10p	0.368	0.545

Component analysis (reproducing full covariance matrix)

	TC1	TC2
panas.01p	0.686	0.182
panas.02p	0.868	-0.021
panas.03p	0.472	0.432
panas.04p	0.854	0.069
panas.05p	0.888	-0.119
panas.06p	-0.128	0.942
panas.07p	0.929	-0.105
panas.08p	0.673	0.241
panas.09p	0.196	0.740
panas.10p	0.446	0.534

Item descriptives

	mean	median	var	sd	IQR	se	min	q1	q3	max	skew	kurt	dip	n	NA	valid
panas.01p	3.4667	4	1.6	1.2649	3	0.1333	1	2	5	5	-0.3322	-1.0339	0.1333	90	0	90
panas.02p	2.7333	3	1.6584	1.2878	2	0.1357	1	2	4	5	0.2248	-0.9924	0.1222	90	0	90
panas.03p	2.4222	2	1.7748	1.3322	2	0.1404	1	1	4	5	0.4916	-0.9541	0.1056	90	0	90
panas.04p	2.6	3	1.4787	1.216	2	0.1282	1	2	4	5	0.2025	-1.0146	0.1222	90	0	90
panas.05p	1.9333	1	1.6584	1.2878	2	0.1357	1	NA	3	5	0.9983	-0.5274	0.0833	90	0	90
panas.06p	3.1111	3	1.6055	1.2671	2	0.1336	1	2	4	5	-0.2133	-1.0606	0.1056	90	0	90
panas.07p	2.5889	2	1.8403	1.3566	3	0.143	1	1	4	5	0.4845	-0.9623	0.1278	90	0	90
panas.08p	2.4333	2	1.5966	1.2636	2	0.1332	1	1	4	5	0.3927	-1.0282	0.1222	90	0	90
panas.09p	3.2778	3	1.2591	1.1221	1	0.1183	1	2	4	5	-0.2791	-0.4901	0.1444	90	0	90
panas.10p	2.7667	3	1.5517	1.2457	2	0.1313	1	1	4	5	-0.0427	-0.9726	0.1167	90	0	90

Scattermatrix

Scatterplot

---

## No viewer found, probably documenting or testing

Summary statistics

name	data_type	n_missing	complete_rate	min	median	max	mean	sd	hist	label
panas.01p	numeric	0	1	1	4	5	3.466667	1.264911	<U+2582><U+2586><U+2586><U+2587><U+2587>	NA
panas.02p	numeric	0	1	1	3	5	2.733333	1.287799	<U+2586><U+2587><U+2587><U+2586><U+2583>	NA
panas.03p	numeric	0	1	1	2	5	2.422222	1.332209	<U+2587><U+2585><U+2585><U+2583><U+2582>	NA
panas.04p	numeric	0	1	1	3	5	2.600000	1.215998	<U+2587><U+2587><U+2587><U+2586><U+2582>	NA
panas.05p	numeric	0	1	1	1	5	1.933333	1.287799	<U+2587><U+2582><U+2581><U+2582><U+2581>	NA
panas.06p	numeric	0	1	1	3	5	3.111111	1.267081	<U+2583><U+2585><U+2585><U+2587><U+2583>	NA
panas.07p	numeric	0	1	1	2	5	2.588889	1.356586	<U+2587><U+2587><U+2585><U+2583><U+2583>	NA
panas.08p	numeric	0	1	1	2	5	2.433333	1.263578	<U+2587><U+2586><U+2585><U+2585><U+2582>	NA
panas.09p	numeric	0	1	1	3	5	3.277778	1.122075	<U+2582><U+2583><U+2587><U+2587><U+2583>	NA
panas.10p	numeric	0	1	1	3	5	2.766667	1.245667	<U+2586><U+2583><U+2587><U+2585><U+2582>	NA

Scale: conflictman

Overview

Reliability: .

Missing: 0.

Likert plot of scale conflictman items

Distribution of scale conflictman

Reliability details

## No viewer found, probably documenting or testing

---

Scale diagnosis

Reliability (internal consistency) estimates

Scale structure

Information about this scale

Dataframe:	res$dat
Items:	conflictman.01, conflictman.02, conflictman.03, conflictman.04, conflictman.05, conflictman.06, conflictman.07, conflictman.08, conflictman.09, conflictman.10, conflictman.11, conflictman.12, conflictman.13, conflictman.14, conflictman.15, conflictman.16, conflictman.17, conflictman.18 & conflictman.19
Observations:	90
Positive correlations:	143
Number of correlations:	171
Percentage positive correlations:	84

Estimates assuming interval level

Omega (total):	0.78
Omega (hierarchical):	0.28
Revelle’s Omega (total):	0.78
Greatest Lower Bound (GLB):	0.88
Coefficient H:	0.78
Coefficient Alpha:	0.73

(Estimates assuming ordinal level not computed, as the polychoric correlation matrix has missing values.)

Note: the normal point estimate and confidence interval for omega are based on the procedure suggested by Dunn, Baguley & Brunsden (2013) using the MBESS function ci.reliability, whereas the psych package point estimate was suggested in Revelle & Zinbarg (2008). See the help (‘?ufs::scaleStructure’) for more information.

Eigen values

3.481, 1.942, 1.898, 1.402, 1.256, 1.135, 1.026, 1.006, 0.863, 0.761, 0.722, 0.676, 0.587, 0.471, 0.461, 0.398, 0.349, 0.295 & 0.27

Factor analysis (reproducing only shared variance)

	ML7	ML1	ML4	ML6	ML3	ML2	ML5	ML8
conflictman.01	0.377	0.068	0.490	-0.079	0.196	-0.061	0.086	0.017
conflictman.02	-0.007	-0.050	0.205	0.306	-0.017	0.001	0.395	0.079
conflictman.03	-0.008	0.980	0.005	-0.001	-0.010	0.032	0.018	0.056
conflictman.04	0.528	0.102	-0.107	0.047	0.135	-0.099	0.134	-0.190
conflictman.05	0.288	0.277	0.027	0.199	0.036	-0.122	-0.379	-0.116
conflictman.06	0.555	0.053	-0.040	-0.122	-0.123	0.039	-0.131	-0.015
conflictman.07	-0.054	0.205	0.054	0.040	0.109	0.020	-0.047	0.614
conflictman.08	0.059	-0.045	0.191	0.171	0.193	-0.041	0.059	0.253
conflictman.09	-0.134	-0.003	0.094	0.615	0.211	0.029	0.002	0.036
conflictman.10	0.584	-0.083	0.235	0.070	-0.003	0.216	0.041	-0.030
conflictman.11	-0.014	0.003	-0.033	-0.015	0.907	0.061	0.028	0.034
conflictman.12	0.169	-0.157	-0.038	0.308	0.187	-0.133	-0.250	0.041
conflictman.13	0.053	0.064	-0.072	0.046	0.066	-0.028	0.746	-0.036
conflictman.14	0.058	0.059	-0.076	0.677	-0.195	0.070	0.071	0.000
conflictman.15	-0.014	0.420	0.337	0.073	0.123	0.027	0.025	-0.177
conflictman.16	0.016	0.021	-0.004	0.013	0.035	0.985	-0.010	-0.004
conflictman.17	0.457	-0.025	0.027	-0.004	-0.088	-0.048	0.131	0.266
conflictman.18	-0.026	0.075	0.748	0.033	-0.096	0.065	-0.088	0.040
conflictman.19	0.369	0.019	-0.284	-0.006	0.098	0.061	0.102	0.303

Component analysis (reproducing full covariance matrix)

	TC3	TC1	TC2	TC6	TC8	TC7	TC4	TC5
conflictman.01	0.533	0.299	0.232	-0.277	0.131	0.063	-0.213	0.060
conflictman.02	0.093	-0.156	0.524	-0.262	0.158	0.118	0.409	-0.056
conflictman.03	-0.021	0.803	-0.042	0.087	-0.001	0.234	0.103	-0.161
conflictman.04	0.549	0.210	0.342	0.228	-0.123	-0.323	0.042	0.071
conflictman.05	0.123	0.562	-0.429	0.062	0.156	-0.342	0.192	0.109
conflictman.06	0.710	-0.039	-0.240	0.154	-0.075	0.056	-0.039	-0.028
conflictman.07	-0.202	0.177	-0.100	0.211	0.385	0.524	-0.032	0.069
conflictman.08	-0.128	0.001	0.093	-0.147	0.800	-0.047	-0.009	0.134
conflictman.09	-0.178	0.150	0.216	-0.090	0.054	0.138	0.481	0.440
conflictman.10	0.752	-0.063	0.040	-0.135	0.110	0.179	0.071	0.160
conflictman.11	-0.076	0.261	0.475	0.178	0.126	0.214	-0.329	0.374
conflictman.12	0.129	-0.134	-0.142	0.052	-0.009	-0.075	0.059	0.886
conflictman.13	0.022	0.005	0.774	0.197	0.083	-0.085	0.113	-0.160
conflictman.14	-0.007	0.079	0.023	0.049	-0.009	0.041	0.880	0.044
conflictman.15	0.007	0.770	0.127	-0.275	-0.033	-0.025	-0.023	0.001
conflictman.16	0.185	0.082	0.008	-0.010	-0.137	0.811	0.111	-0.054
conflictman.17	0.307	-0.058	-0.014	0.236	0.660	-0.122	0.057	-0.266
conflictman.18	0.199	0.223	-0.186	-0.672	0.213	0.188	0.009	-0.034
conflictman.19	0.188	0.008	0.067	0.688	0.205	0.240	-0.005	0.062

Item descriptives

	mean	median	var	sd	IQR	se	min	q1	q3	max	skew	kurt	dip	n	NA	valid
conflictman.01	3.1667	3	0.5674	0.7533	1	0.0794	1	2	4	4	-0.6094	0.0181	0.1778	90	0	90
conflictman.02	2.5889	3	0.7167	0.8466	1	0.0892	1	2	4	4	-0.115	-0.5358	0.1722	90	0	90
conflictman.03	3.2222	3	0.5119	0.7154	1	0.0754	1	2	4	4	-0.9212	1.4094	0.1778	90	0	90
conflictman.04	3.0889	3	0.5763	0.7591	1	0.08	1	2	4	4	-0.6236	0.2984	0.15	90	0	90
conflictman.05	3.3	3	0.5045	0.7103	1	0.0749	1	2	4	4	-0.7004	0.0241	0.2167	90	0	90
conflictman.06	3.2333	3	0.4281	0.6543	1	0.069	1	2	4	4	-0.5257	0.454	0.1722	90	0	90
conflictman.07	2.9778	3	0.4489	0.67	0	0.0706	1	2	4	4	-0.2038	-0.038	0.1	90	0	90
conflictman.08	3.0444	3	0.4699	0.6855	0	0.0723	1	2	4	4	-0.6986	1.3044	0.1111	90	0	90
conflictman.09	2.3444	2	0.7452	0.8632	1	0.091	1	1	3	4	-0.0931	-0.7727	0.1722	90	0	90
conflictman.10	3.4	3	0.4449	0.667	1	0.0703	1	2	4	4	-0.9014	0.7167	0.2167	90	0	90
conflictman.11	2.2222	2	1.0062	1.0031	2	0.1057	1	1	3	4	0.0832	-1.2431	0.1611	90	0	90
conflictman.12	2.6778	3	0.513	0.7162	1	0.0755	1	2	4	4	0.0045	-0.2822	0.1833	90	0	90
conflictman.13	1.9778	2	0.7635	0.8738	2	0.0921	1	1	3	4	0.457	-0.6678	0.1722	90	0	90
conflictman.14	2.9222	3	0.8141	0.9023	2	0.0951	1	2	4	4	-0.5953	-0.3014	0.1389	90	0	90
conflictman.15	3.0333	3	0.6169	0.7854	1	0.0828	1	2	4	4	-0.7707	0.6541	0.1333	90	0	90
conflictman.16	3.4333	4	0.6079	0.7797	1	0.0822	1	3	NA	4	-1.2282	0.7565	0.1389	90	0	90
conflictman.17	3.2111	3	0.5055	0.711	1	0.0749	1	2	4	4	-0.5224	-0.1597	0.1833	90	0	90
conflictman.18	3.5	4	0.4551	0.6746	1	0.0711	1	3	NA	4	-1.2353	1.2277	0.1667	90	0	90
conflictman.19	2.1444	2	0.934	0.9664	2	0.1019	1	1	3	4	0.391	-0.8328	0.15	90	0	90

Scattermatrix

Scatterplot

---

## No viewer found, probably documenting or testing

Summary statistics

name	data_type	n_missing	complete_rate	min	median	max	mean	sd	hist	label
conflictman.01	numeric	0	1	1	3	4	3.166667	0.7532700	<U+2581><U+2582><U+2581><U+2587><U+2586>	NA
conflictman.02	numeric	0	1	1	3	4	2.588889	0.8465985	<U+2582><U+2586><U+2581><U+2587><U+2582>	NA
conflictman.03	numeric	0	1	1	3	4	3.222222	0.7154440	<U+2581><U+2581><U+2581><U+2587><U+2585>	NA
conflictman.04	numeric	0	1	1	3	4	3.088889	0.7591309	<U+2581><U+2582><U+2581><U+2587><U+2585>	NA
conflictman.05	numeric	0	1	1	3	4	3.300000	0.7102777	<U+2581><U+2582><U+2581><U+2587><U+2587>	NA
conflictman.06	numeric	0	1	1	3	4	3.233333	0.6542858	<U+2581><U+2581><U+2581><U+2587><U+2585>	NA
conflictman.07	numeric	0	1	1	3	4	2.977778	0.6700290	<U+2581><U+2583><U+2581><U+2587><U+2583>	NA
conflictman.08	numeric	0	1	1	3	4	3.044444	0.6855017	<U+2581><U+2582><U+2581><U+2587><U+2583>	NA
conflictman.09	numeric	0	1	1	2	4	2.344444	0.8632459	<U+2583><U+2587><U+2581><U+2587><U+2581>	NA
conflictman.10	numeric	0	1	1	3	4	3.400000	0.6670411	<U+2581><U+2581><U+2581><U+2587><U+2587>	NA
conflictman.11	numeric	0	1	1	2	4	2.222222	1.0031162	<U+2587><U+2585><U+2581><U+2587><U+2582>	NA
conflictman.12	numeric	0	1	1	3	4	2.677778	0.7162289	<U+2581><U+2586><U+2581><U+2587><U+2582>	NA
conflictman.13	numeric	0	1	1	2	4	1.977778	0.8738109	<U+2587><U+2587><U+2581><U+2585><U+2581>	NA
conflictman.14	numeric	0	1	1	3	4	2.922222	0.9022790	<U+2582><U+2583><U+2581><U+2587><U+2585>	NA
conflictman.15	numeric	0	1	1	3	4	3.033333	0.7854005	<U+2581><U+2582><U+2581><U+2587><U+2583>	NA
conflictman.16	numeric	0	1	1	4	4	3.433333	0.7796571	<U+2581><U+2582><U+2581><U+2583><U+2587>	NA
conflictman.17	numeric	0	1	1	3	4	3.211111	0.7109804	<U+2581><U+2582><U+2581><U+2587><U+2586>	NA
conflictman.18	numeric	0	1	1	4	4	3.500000	0.6745785	<U+2581><U+2581><U+2581><U+2585><U+2587>	NA
conflictman.19	numeric	0	1	1	2	4	2.144444	0.9664148	<U+2587><U+2587><U+2581><U+2586><U+2582>	NA

Scale: TAM_bi

Overview

Reliability: .

Missing: 0.

Likert plot of scale TAM_bi items

Distribution of scale TAM_bi

Reliability details

## No viewer found, probably documenting or testing

---

Scale diagnosis

Reliability (internal consistency) estimates

Scale structure

Information about this scale

Dataframe:	res$dat
Items:	tam_bi.01, tam_bi.02, tam_bi.03, tam_bi.04 & tam_bi.05
Observations:	90
Positive correlations:	10
Number of correlations:	10
Percentage positive correlations:	100

Estimates assuming interval level

Omega (total):	0.94
Omega (hierarchical):	0.93
Revelle’s Omega (total):	0.94
Greatest Lower Bound (GLB):	0.95
Coefficient H:	0.97
Coefficient Alpha:	0.92

(Estimates assuming ordinal level not computed, as the polychoric correlation matrix has missing values.)

Note: the normal point estimate and confidence interval for omega are based on the procedure suggested by Dunn, Baguley & Brunsden (2013) using the MBESS function ci.reliability, whereas the psych package point estimate was suggested in Revelle & Zinbarg (2008). See the help (‘?ufs::scaleStructure’) for more information.

Eigen values

3.781, 0.645, 0.306, 0.201 & 0.067

Factor analysis (reproducing only shared variance)

	ML1
tam_bi.01	0.956
tam_bi.02	0.972
tam_bi.03	0.613
tam_bi.04	0.753
tam_bi.05	0.866

Component analysis (reproducing full covariance matrix)

	PC1
tam_bi.01	0.948
tam_bi.02	0.953
tam_bi.03	0.696
tam_bi.04	0.815
tam_bi.05	0.907

Item descriptives

	mean	median	var	sd	IQR	se	min	q1	q3	max	skew	kurt	dip	n	NA	valid
tam_bi.01	3.7778	4	3.7703	1.9417	3	0.2047	1	1	5	7	-0.0366	-1.0917	0.1	90	0	90
tam_bi.02	3.8444	4	3.3913	1.8415	3	0.1941	1	2	5	7	-0.1634	-0.9583	0.1	90	0	90
tam_bi.03	4.2667	5	3.1865	1.7851	2	0.1882	1	3	6	7	-0.4982	-0.7605	0.0833	90	0	90
tam_bi.04	3.3889	3	3.8808	1.97	4	0.2077	1	1	5	7	0.1514	-1.3458	0.0889	90	0	90
tam_bi.05	3.7778	4	3.7928	1.9475	3	0.2053	1	2	5	7	-0.0435	-1.1278	0.1	90	0	90

Scattermatrix

Scatterplot

---

## No viewer found, probably documenting or testing

Summary statistics

name	data_type	n_missing	complete_rate	min	median	max	mean	sd	hist	label
tam_bi.01	numeric	0	1	1	4	7	3.777778	1.941723	<U+2587><U+2582><U+2586><U+2585><U+2585>	NA
tam_bi.02	numeric	0	1	1	4	7	3.844444	1.841538	<U+2587><U+2583><U+2586><U+2587><U+2585>	NA
tam_bi.03	numeric	0	1	1	5	7	4.266667	1.785082	<U+2585><U+2583><U+2582><U+2587><U+2586>	NA
tam_bi.04	numeric	0	1	1	3	7	3.388889	1.969968	<U+2587><U+2582><U+2582><U+2583><U+2583>	NA
tam_bi.05	numeric	0	1	1	4	7	3.777778	1.947501	<U+2587><U+2582><U+2585><U+2586><U+2585>	NA

Scale: TAM_canx

Overview

Reliability: .

Missing: 0.

Likert plot of scale TAM_canx items

Distribution of scale TAM_canx

Reliability details

## No viewer found, probably documenting or testing

---

Scale diagnosis

Reliability (internal consistency) estimates

Scale structure

Information about this scale

Dataframe:	res$dat
Items:	tam_canx.01n, tam_canx.02, tam_canx.03 & tam_canx.04
Observations:	90
Positive correlations:	3
Number of correlations:	6
Percentage positive correlations:	50

Estimates assuming interval level

Omega (total):	0.95
Omega (hierarchical):	0.90
Revelle’s Omega (total):	0.95
Greatest Lower Bound (GLB):	0.88
Coefficient H:	0.97
Coefficient Alpha:	0.46

(Estimates assuming ordinal level not computed, as the polychoric correlation matrix has missing values.)

Note: the normal point estimate and confidence interval for omega are based on the procedure suggested by Dunn, Baguley & Brunsden (2013) using the MBESS function ci.reliability, whereas the psych package point estimate was suggested in Revelle & Zinbarg (2008). See the help (‘?ufs::scaleStructure’) for more information.

Eigen values

3.355, 0.435, 0.139 & 0.071

Factor analysis (reproducing only shared variance)

	ML1
tam_canx.01n	-0.725
tam_canx.02	0.899
tam_canx.03	0.967
tam_canx.04	0.957

Component analysis (reproducing full covariance matrix)

	PC1
tam_canx.01n	-0.816
tam_canx.02	0.918
tam_canx.03	0.958
tam_canx.04	0.963

Item descriptives

	mean	median	var	sd	IQR	se	min	q1	q3	max	skew	kurt	dip	n	NA	valid
tam_canx.01n	2.4556	2	1.7115	1.3082	2	0.1379	1	1	3	7	1.0691	1.2534	0.1278	90	0	90
tam_canx.02	5.4556	6	2.3856	1.5446	2	0.1628	1	5	7	7	-1.0469	0.7197	0.1556	90	0	90
tam_canx.03	5.2444	5.5	2.5463	1.5957	3	0.1682	1	4	7	7	-0.8018	-0.0643	0.1167	90	0	90
tam_canx.04	5.3222	6	2.5355	1.5923	2	0.1678	1	5	7	7	-0.8372	-0.1785	0.1278	90	0	90

Scattermatrix

Scatterplot

---

## No viewer found, probably documenting or testing

Summary statistics

name	data_type	n_missing	complete_rate	min	median	max	mean	sd	hist	label
tam_canx.01n	numeric	0	1	1	2.0	7	2.455556	1.308238	<U+2587><U+2583><U+2581><U+2581><U+2581>	NA
tam_canx.02	numeric	0	1	1	6.0	7	5.455556	1.544553	<U+2581><U+2581><U+2581><U+2585><U+2587>	NA
tam_canx.03	numeric	0	1	1	5.5	7	5.244444	1.595718	<U+2581><U+2581><U+2582><U+2583><U+2587>	NA
tam_canx.04	numeric	0	1	1	6.0	7	5.322222	1.592311	<U+2581><U+2582><U+2581><U+2583><U+2587>	NA

Scale: TAM_enj

Overview

Reliability: .

Missing: 0.

Likert plot of scale TAM_enj items

Distribution of scale TAM_enj

Reliability details

## No viewer found, probably documenting or testing

---

Scale diagnosis

Reliability (internal consistency) estimates

Scale structure

Information about this scale

Dataframe:	res$dat
Items:	tam_enj.01, tam_enj.02 & tam_enj.03
Observations:	90
Positive correlations:	3
Number of correlations:	3
Percentage positive correlations:	100

Estimates assuming interval level

Omega (total):	0.91
Omega (hierarchical):	0.00
Revelle’s Omega (total):	0.91
Greatest Lower Bound (GLB):	0.92
Coefficient H:	0.92
Coefficient Alpha:	0.91

(Estimates assuming ordinal level not computed, as the polychoric correlation matrix has missing values.)

Note: the normal point estimate and confidence interval for omega are based on the procedure suggested by Dunn, Baguley & Brunsden (2013) using the MBESS function ci.reliability, whereas the psych package point estimate was suggested in Revelle & Zinbarg (2008). See the help (‘?ufs::scaleStructure’) for more information.

Eigen values

2.541, 0.277 & 0.182

Factor analysis (reproducing only shared variance)

	ML1
tam_enj.01	0.933
tam_enj.02	0.857
tam_enj.03	0.845

Component analysis (reproducing full covariance matrix)

	PC1
tam_enj.01	0.939
tam_enj.02	0.913
tam_enj.03	0.909

Item descriptives

	mean	median	var	sd	IQR	se	min	q1	q3	max	skew	kurt	dip	n	NA	valid
tam_enj.01	4.0111	4	3.3819	1.839	2	0.1938	1	2	6	7	-0.2273	-0.9282	0.0889	90	0	90
tam_enj.02	4.1	4	2.8775	1.6963	2	0.1788	1	2	5	7	-0.3153	-0.4631	0.1333	90	0	90
tam_enj.03	3.9	4	2.9899	1.7291	2	0.1823	1	2	5	7	-0.1891	-0.7791	0.1167	90	0	90

Scattermatrix

Scatterplot

---

## No viewer found, probably documenting or testing

Summary statistics

name	data_type	n_missing	complete_rate	min	median	max	mean	sd	hist	label
tam_enj.01	numeric	0	1	1	4	7	4.011111	1.838994	<U+2587><U+2585><U+2587><U+2586><U+2587>	NA
tam_enj.02	numeric	0	1	1	4	7	4.100000	1.696328	<U+2586><U+2583><U+2587><U+2587><U+2585>	NA
tam_enj.03	numeric	0	1	1	4	7	3.900000	1.729129	<U+2587><U+2583><U+2587><U+2587><U+2585>	NA

Scale: TAM_img

Overview

Reliability: .

Missing: 0.

Likert plot of scale TAM_img items

Distribution of scale TAM_img

Reliability details

## No viewer found, probably documenting or testing

---

Scale diagnosis

Reliability (internal consistency) estimates

Scale structure

Information about this scale

Dataframe:	res$dat
Items:	tam_img.01, tam_img.02 & tam_img.03
Observations:	90
Positive correlations:	3
Number of correlations:	3
Percentage positive correlations:	100

Estimates assuming interval level

Omega (total):	0.90
Omega (hierarchical):	0.03
Revelle’s Omega (total):	0.90
Greatest Lower Bound (GLB):	0.91
Coefficient H:	0.91
Coefficient Alpha:	0.90

(Estimates assuming ordinal level not computed, as the polychoric correlation matrix has missing values.)

Note: the normal point estimate and confidence interval for omega are based on the procedure suggested by Dunn, Baguley & Brunsden (2013) using the MBESS function ci.reliability, whereas the psych package point estimate was suggested in Revelle & Zinbarg (2008). See the help (‘?ufs::scaleStructure’) for more information.

Eigen values

2.498, 0.309 & 0.193

Factor analysis (reproducing only shared variance)

	ML1
tam_img.01	0.920
tam_img.02	0.805
tam_img.03	0.873

Component analysis (reproducing full covariance matrix)

	PC1
tam_img.01	0.931
tam_img.02	0.890
tam_img.03	0.916

Item descriptives

	mean	median	var	sd	IQR	se	min	q1	q3	max	skew	kurt	dip	n	NA	valid
tam_img.01	3.7778	4	3.1635	1.7786	3	0.1875	1	2	5	7	-0.1211	-1.1082	0.075	90	0	90
tam_img.02	3.9889	4	2.9325	1.7124	2	0.1805	1	2	5	7	-0.257	-0.8677	0.0833	90	0	90
tam_img.03	4.0778	4	3.1512	1.7752	2	0.1871	1	2	6	7	-0.268	-0.9258	0.1	90	0	90

Scattermatrix

Scatterplot

---

## No viewer found, probably documenting or testing

Summary statistics

name	data_type	n_missing	complete_rate	min	median	max	mean	sd	hist	label
tam_img.01	numeric	0	1	1	4	7	3.777778	1.778636	<U+2587><U+2583><U+2583><U+2587><U+2585>	NA
tam_img.02	numeric	0	1	1	4	7	3.988889	1.712443	<U+2586><U+2583><U+2585><U+2587><U+2585>	NA
tam_img.03	numeric	0	1	1	4	7	4.077778	1.775158	<U+2587><U+2582><U+2587><U+2586><U+2587>	NA

Scale: TAM_pec

Overview

Reliability: .

Missing: 0.

Likert plot of scale TAM_pec items

Distribution of scale TAM_pec

Reliability details

## No viewer found, probably documenting or testing

---

Scale diagnosis

Reliability (internal consistency) estimates

Scale structure

Information about this scale

Dataframe:	res$dat
Items:	tam_pec.01, tam_pec.02, tam_pec.03 & tam_pec.04
Observations:	90
Positive correlations:	3
Number of correlations:	6
Percentage positive correlations:	50

Estimates assuming interval level

Omega (total):	0.58
Omega (hierarchical):	0.20
Revelle’s Omega (total):	0.58
Greatest Lower Bound (GLB):	0.69
Coefficient H:	0.87
Coefficient Alpha:	0.44

(Estimates assuming ordinal level not computed, as the polychoric correlation matrix has missing values.)

Note: the normal point estimate and confidence interval for omega are based on the procedure suggested by Dunn, Baguley & Brunsden (2013) using the MBESS function ci.reliability, whereas the psych package point estimate was suggested in Revelle & Zinbarg (2008). See the help (‘?ufs::scaleStructure’) for more information.

Eigen values

2.27, 0.932, 0.499 & 0.298

Factor analysis (reproducing only shared variance)

	ML1
tam_pec.01	0.608
tam_pec.02	0.758
tam_pec.03	0.911
tam_pec.04	-0.323

Component analysis (reproducing full covariance matrix)

	PC1
tam_pec.01	0.739
tam_pec.02	0.854
tam_pec.03	0.893
tam_pec.04	-0.447

Item descriptives

	mean	median	var	sd	IQR	se	min	q1	q3	max	skew	kurt	dip	n	NA	valid
tam_pec.01	4.5111	5	2.5448	1.5952	3	0.1682	1	3	6	7	-0.4622	-0.3519	0.0833	90	0	90
tam_pec.02	4.9667	5	1.8978	1.3776	2	0.1452	1	4	6	7	-0.4928	-0.0704	0.1222	90	0	90
tam_pec.03	4.9778	5	1.9321	1.39	2	0.1465	1	4	6	7	-0.9351	0.786	0.1389	90	0	90
tam_pec.04	3.4556	4	2.3632	1.5373	2	0.162	1	2	6	7	0.3323	0.0209	0.0889	90	0	90

Scattermatrix

Scatterplot

---

## No viewer found, probably documenting or testing

Summary statistics

name	data_type	n_missing	complete_rate	min	median	max	mean	sd	hist	label
tam_pec.01	numeric	0	1	1	5	7	4.511111	1.595249	<U+2583><U+2583><U+2585><U+2587><U+2587>	NA
tam_pec.02	numeric	0	1	1	5	7	4.966667	1.377590	<U+2581><U+2582><U+2585><U+2586><U+2587>	NA
tam_pec.03	numeric	0	1	1	5	7	4.977778	1.389995	<U+2582><U+2581><U+2583><U+2587><U+2587>	NA
tam_pec.04	numeric	0	1	1	4	7	3.455556	1.537261	<U+2586><U+2583><U+2587><U+2581><U+2582>	NA

Scale: TAM_pu

Overview

Reliability: .

Missing: 0.

Likert plot of scale TAM_pu items

Distribution of scale TAM_pu

Reliability details

## No viewer found, probably documenting or testing

---

Scale diagnosis

Reliability (internal consistency) estimates

Scale structure

Information about this scale

Dataframe:	res$dat
Items:	tam_pu.01, tam_pu.02, tam_pu.03 & tam_pu.04
Observations:	90
Positive correlations:	6
Number of correlations:	6
Percentage positive correlations:	100

Estimates assuming interval level

Omega (total):	0.06
Omega (hierarchical):	0.05
Revelle’s Omega (total):	0.06
Greatest Lower Bound (GLB):	0.97
Coefficient H:	0.98
Coefficient Alpha:	0.97

(Estimates assuming ordinal level not computed, as the polychoric correlation matrix has missing values.)

Note: the normal point estimate and confidence interval for omega are based on the procedure suggested by Dunn, Baguley & Brunsden (2013) using the MBESS function ci.reliability, whereas the psych package point estimate was suggested in Revelle & Zinbarg (2008). See the help (‘?ufs::scaleStructure’) for more information.

Eigen values

3.685, 0.146, 0.102 & 0.068

Factor analysis (reproducing only shared variance)

	ML1
tam_pu.01	0.972
tam_pu.02	0.956
tam_pu.03	0.936
tam_pu.04	0.921

Component analysis (reproducing full covariance matrix)

	PC1
tam_pu.01	0.973
tam_pu.02	0.965
tam_pu.03	0.955
tam_pu.04	0.946

Item descriptives

	mean	median	var	sd	IQR	se	min	q1	q3	max	skew	kurt	dip	n	NA	valid
tam_pu.01	5.0333	5	2.6843	1.6384	2	0.1727	1	3	6	7	-1.0423	0.7239	0.1278	90	0	90
tam_pu.02	5.1111	5	2.7291	1.652	1	0.1741	1	3	6	7	-1.0835	0.8386	0.1167	90	0	90
tam_pu.03	4.9667	5	2.9764	1.7252	2	0.1819	1	3	7	7	-0.8739	0.2273	0.1111	90	0	90
tam_pu.04	4.8778	5	2.6478	1.6272	2	0.1715	1	4	6	7	-0.9026	0.3771	0.1167	90	0	90

Scattermatrix

Scatterplot

---

## No viewer found, probably documenting or testing

Summary statistics

name	data_type	n_missing	complete_rate	min	median	max	mean	sd	hist	label
tam_pu.01	numeric	0	1	1	5	7	5.033333	1.638374	<U+2582><U+2581><U+2582><U+2586><U+2587>	NA
tam_pu.02	numeric	0	1	1	5	7	5.111111	1.651995	<U+2582><U+2581><U+2582><U+2586><U+2587>	NA
tam_pu.03	numeric	0	1	1	5	7	4.966667	1.725226	<U+2582><U+2581><U+2582><U+2587><U+2587>	NA
tam_pu.04	numeric	0	1	1	5	7	4.877778	1.627211	<U+2582><U+2581><U+2583><U+2586><U+2587>	NA

Scale: TAM_rel

Overview

Reliability: .

Missing: 0.

Likert plot of scale TAM_rel items

Distribution of scale TAM_rel

Reliability details

## No viewer found, probably documenting or testing

---

Scale diagnosis

Reliability (internal consistency) estimates

Scale structure

Information about this scale

Dataframe:	res$dat
Items:	tam_rel.01, tam_rel.02 & tam_rel.03
Observations:	90
Positive correlations:	3
Number of correlations:	3
Percentage positive correlations:	100

Estimates assuming interval level

Omega (total):	0.95
Omega (hierarchical):	0.02
Revelle’s Omega (total):	0.95
Greatest Lower Bound (GLB):	0.96
Coefficient H:	0.96
Coefficient Alpha:	0.95

(Estimates assuming ordinal level not computed, as the polychoric correlation matrix has missing values.)

Note: the normal point estimate and confidence interval for omega are based on the procedure suggested by Dunn, Baguley & Brunsden (2013) using the MBESS function ci.reliability, whereas the psych package point estimate was suggested in Revelle & Zinbarg (2008). See the help (‘?ufs::scaleStructure’) for more information.

Eigen values

2.73, 0.174 & 0.096

Factor analysis (reproducing only shared variance)

	ML1
tam_rel.01	0.931
tam_rel.02	0.966
tam_rel.03	0.893

Component analysis (reproducing full covariance matrix)

	PC1
tam_rel.01	0.955
tam_rel.02	0.966
tam_rel.03	0.941

Item descriptives

	mean	median	var	sd	IQR	se	min	q1	q3	max	skew	kurt	dip	n	NA	valid
tam_rel.01	4.4556	5	3.307	1.8185	3	0.1917	1	2	6	7	-0.5804	-0.7253	0.1167	90	0	90
tam_rel.02	4.6	5	3.0067	1.734	2	0.1828	1	3	6	7	-0.7871	-0.2594	0.1333	90	0	90
tam_rel.03	4.5	5	2.6573	1.6301	1	0.1718	1	3	6	7	-0.8197	-0.0592	0.0889	90	0	90

Scattermatrix

Scatterplot

---

## No viewer found, probably documenting or testing

Summary statistics

name	data_type	n_missing	complete_rate	min	median	max	mean	sd	hist	label
tam_rel.01	numeric	0	1	1	5	7	4.455556	1.818513	<U+2585><U+2581><U+2583><U+2586><U+2587>	NA
tam_rel.02	numeric	0	1	1	5	7	4.600000	1.733996	<U+2583><U+2582><U+2583><U+2586><U+2587>	NA
tam_rel.03	numeric	0	1	1	5	7	4.500000	1.630124	<U+2583><U+2582><U+2582><U+2587><U+2585>	NA

Scale: TAM_res

Overview

Reliability: .

Missing: 0.

Likert plot of scale TAM_res items

Distribution of scale TAM_res

Reliability details

## No viewer found, probably documenting or testing

---

Scale diagnosis

Reliability (internal consistency) estimates

Scale structure

Information about this scale

Dataframe:	res$dat
Items:	tam_res.01, tam_res.02, tam_res.03 & tam_res.04
Observations:	90
Positive correlations:	3
Number of correlations:	6
Percentage positive correlations:	50

Estimates assuming interval level

Omega (total):	0.80
Omega (hierarchical):	0.57
Revelle’s Omega (total):	0.80
Greatest Lower Bound (GLB):	0.60
Coefficient H:	0.73
Coefficient Alpha:	-0.02

(Estimates assuming ordinal level not computed, as the polychoric correlation matrix has missing values.)

Note: the normal point estimate and confidence interval for omega are based on the procedure suggested by Dunn, Baguley & Brunsden (2013) using the MBESS function ci.reliability, whereas the psych package point estimate was suggested in Revelle & Zinbarg (2008). See the help (‘?ufs::scaleStructure’) for more information.

Eigen values

2.105, 1.043, 0.444 & 0.409

Factor analysis (reproducing only shared variance)

	ML1	ML2
tam_res.01	-0.096	0.768
tam_res.02	0.831	-0.009
tam_res.03	0.143	0.706
tam_res.04	-0.675	-0.034

Component analysis (reproducing full covariance matrix)

	TC1	TC2
tam_res.01	-0.108	0.937
tam_res.02	0.875	0.023
tam_res.03	0.201	0.791
tam_res.04	-0.887	0.014

Item descriptives

	mean	median	var	sd	IQR	se	min	q1	q3	max	skew	kurt	dip	n	NA	valid
tam_res.01	5.1111	5	2.3471	1.532	2	0.1615	1	3	6	7	-1.0347	0.7241	0.1333	90	0	90
tam_res.02	5.4667	5	1.0157	1.0078	1	0.1062	2	3	6	7	-0.7151	1.3527	0.1667	90	0	90
tam_res.03	5.5333	6	1.4427	1.2011	1	0.1266	1	5	7	7	-0.7367	0.8957	0.1278	90	0	90
tam_res.04	2.9	3	2.0236	1.4225	2	0.1499	1	2	5	7	0.7789	0.1256	0.15	90	0	90

Scattermatrix

Scatterplot

---

## No viewer found, probably documenting or testing

Summary statistics

name	data_type	n_missing	complete_rate	min	median	max	mean	sd	hist	label
tam_res.01	numeric	0	1	1	5	7	5.111111	1.532014	<U+2581><U+2581><U+2582><U+2585><U+2587>	NA
tam_res.02	numeric	0	1	2	5	7	5.466667	1.007834	<U+2581><U+2581><U+2587><U+2586><U+2582>	NA
tam_res.03	numeric	0	1	1	6	7	5.533333	1.201123	<U+2581><U+2581><U+2582><U+2583><U+2587>	NA
tam_res.04	numeric	0	1	1	3	7	2.900000	1.422531	<U+2587><U+2586><U+2582><U+2582><U+2581>	NA

Scale: TAM_sn

Overview

Reliability: .

Missing: 0.

Likert plot of scale TAM_sn items

Distribution of scale TAM_sn

Reliability details

## No viewer found, probably documenting or testing

---

Scale diagnosis

Reliability (internal consistency) estimates

Scale structure

Information about this scale

Dataframe:	res$dat
Items:	tam_sn.01, tam_sn.02, tam_sn.03 & tam_sn.04
Observations:	90
Positive correlations:	6
Number of correlations:	6
Percentage positive correlations:	100

Estimates assuming interval level

Omega (total):	0.83
Omega (hierarchical):	0.69
Revelle’s Omega (total):	0.83
Greatest Lower Bound (GLB):	0.83
Coefficient H:	0.86
Coefficient Alpha:	0.76

(Estimates assuming ordinal level not computed, as the polychoric correlation matrix has missing values.)

Note: the normal point estimate and confidence interval for omega are based on the procedure suggested by Dunn, Baguley & Brunsden (2013) using the MBESS function ci.reliability, whereas the psych package point estimate was suggested in Revelle & Zinbarg (2008). See the help (‘?ufs::scaleStructure’) for more information.

Eigen values

2.376, 0.824, 0.52 & 0.28

Factor analysis (reproducing only shared variance)

	ML1
tam_sn.01	0.771
tam_sn.02	0.897
tam_sn.03	0.618
tam_sn.04	0.380

Component analysis (reproducing full covariance matrix)

	PC1
tam_sn.01	0.813
tam_sn.02	0.863
tam_sn.03	0.786
tam_sn.04	0.595

Item descriptives

	mean	median	var	sd	IQR	se	min	q1	q3	max	skew	kurt	dip	n	NA	valid
tam_sn.01	3.3778	4	2.2602	1.5034	2	0.1585	1	2	5	6	-0.1448	-0.9941	0.0889	90	0	90
tam_sn.02	3.1	3	2.1809	1.4768	2	0.1557	1	2	5	7	0.2308	-0.7954	0.1056	90	0	90
tam_sn.03	4.2444	5	2.1643	1.4712	2	0.1551	1	3	6	7	-0.5651	-0.0408	0.1111	90	0	90
tam_sn.04	3.8556	4	2.462	1.5691	2	0.1654	1	3	5	7	-0.1481	-1.0163	0.1222	90	0	90

Scattermatrix

Scatterplot

---

## No viewer found, probably documenting or testing

Summary statistics

name	data_type	n_missing	complete_rate	min	median	max	mean	sd	hist	label
tam_sn.01	numeric	0	1	1	4	6	3.377778	1.503388	<U+2587><U+2583><U+2587><U+2585><U+2582>	NA
tam_sn.02	numeric	0	1	1	3	7	3.100000	1.476787	<U+2587><U+2585><U+2583><U+2583><U+2581>	NA
tam_sn.03	numeric	0	1	1	5	7	4.244444	1.471154	<U+2583><U+2582><U+2585><U+2587><U+2583>	NA
tam_sn.04	numeric	0	1	1	4	7	3.855556	1.569091	<U+2586><U+2587><U+2583><U+2587><U+2585>	NA

Scale: TAM_vol

Overview

Reliability: .

Missing: 0.

## Error in likert::likert(as.data.frame(items)): All items (columns) must have the same number of levels

Distribution of scale TAM_vol

Reliability details

## No viewer found, probably documenting or testing

---

Scale diagnosis

Reliability (internal consistency) estimates

Scale structure

Information about this scale

Dataframe:	res$dat
Items:	tam_vol.01, tam_vol.02 & tam_vol.03
Observations:	90
Positive correlations:	3
Number of correlations:	3
Percentage positive correlations:	100

Estimates assuming interval level

Omega (total):	0.81
Omega (hierarchical):	0.04
Revelle’s Omega (total):	0.81
Greatest Lower Bound (GLB):	0.82
Coefficient H:	0.82
Coefficient Alpha:	0.79

(Estimates assuming ordinal level not computed, as the polychoric correlation matrix has missing values.)

Note: the normal point estimate and confidence interval for omega are based on the procedure suggested by Dunn, Baguley & Brunsden (2013) using the MBESS function ci.reliability, whereas the psych package point estimate was suggested in Revelle & Zinbarg (2008). See the help (‘?ufs::scaleStructure’) for more information.

Eigen values

2.149, 0.491 & 0.36

Factor analysis (reproducing only shared variance)

	ML1
tam_vol.01	0.684
tam_vol.02	0.833
tam_vol.03	0.760

Component analysis (reproducing full covariance matrix)

	PC1
tam_vol.01	0.816
tam_vol.02	0.872
tam_vol.03	0.850

Item descriptives

	mean	median	var	sd	IQR	se	min	q1	q3	max	skew	kurt	dip	n	NA	valid
tam_vol.01	6.6111	7	0.7797	0.883	0	0.0931	2	6	NA	7	-3.0506	10.8505	0.0722	90	0	90
tam_vol.02	6.5889	7	0.7841	0.8855	1	0.0933	2	6	NA	7	-2.9569	10.381	0.0833	90	0	90
tam_vol.03	6.1444	7	1.5632	1.2503	1	0.1318	2	6	NA	7	-1.8672	3.4238	0.1333	90	0	90

Scattermatrix

Scatterplot

---

## No viewer found, probably documenting or testing

Summary statistics

name	data_type	n_missing	complete_rate	min	median	max	mean	sd	hist	label
tam_vol.01	numeric	0	1	2	7	7	6.611111	0.8829782	<U+2581><U+2581><U+2581><U+2582><U+2587>	NA
tam_vol.02	numeric	0	1	2	7	7	6.588889	0.8855195	<U+2581><U+2581><U+2581><U+2582><U+2587>	NA
tam_vol.03	numeric	0	1	2	7	7	6.144444	1.2502684	<U+2581><U+2581><U+2582><U+2583><U+2587>	NA

Missingness report

Codebook table